Brother DefendTheTruth has been posting a lot lately about Eritrea's borders and the 'birth defect' of Eritrea.
When was Eritrea born?
Eritrea was found in 1889 as Colonia Eritrea. Eritrea's borders with neighboring countries are largely defined by a series of colonial treaties. Key treaties shaping the Eritrean-Ethiopian border include the 1900, 1902, and 1908 treaties, each delineating specific sections of the border. The 1900 treaty set the "Mareb-Belesa-Muna" line as the border, while the 1902 treaty covered the western sector, and the 1908 treaty addressed the eastern sector.
Ethiopian borders are also results of colonial treaties. The key treaties include: the 1900, 1902, and 1908 treaties with Italy; The Tripartite Treaty of 1906 signed by Britain, France and Italy; the Rodd Treaty of 1897 with Britain. Every inch of Ethiopian border is a result of colonial treaty and Ethiopia does not have border treaties with the peoples of Kenya, Somalia, Sudan and Djibouti.
Colonial treaties based borders [the birth defect] is not unique to Eritrea and Ethiopia. Every country in Africa has borders based on colonial treaties. "The African continent today has some 83,500 km of political land borders, drawn up in a short quarter of a century (1885-1909). These chancellorial borders were established by Europe on unrecognizable maps and, above all, without prior field survey. The states that participated in drawing these borders were, in order of influence, France (32%) and the United Kingdom (26.8%), that is, almost 60% between them. Next are Germany (8.7%), Belgium (7.6%: the mention of Belgium includes those companies ruled by Leopold II) and Portugal (6.9%), that is, nearly 82% for these 5 states named. Ottoman Turkey (4%) Italy (1.7%) and Spain (1.5%) complete the African border map. The Europeans made maps of the African geographical contours and began to draw lines and write names on them which they called countries."
Pre 'birth-defect' borders of African borders and Post 'birth-defect' African borders

Therefore, what Defend calls Eritrea's ' birth defect' is every African country's birth defect as every centimeter of African border is a result of agreement with or among colonialists. The OAU (Organization of African Unity), and later the AU (African Union), formally adopted the principle of respecting colonial borders, a concept known as uti possidetis juris. This principle essentially means that the existing colonial boundaries should be respected and considered inviolable upon the achievement of independence. This was intended to prevent conflict and instability in the newly independent African states.
The essence of sovereignty and statehood fundamental concept of post 20th century world politics. America is the worlds most powerful country but it could not erase Cuba's sovereignty and statehood regardless how close it is to American border.
Matthew 7:3-5 says:
"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite!

Having colonial borders and being a colonial founded country is not a birth defect as many countries in the world have have shown that these countries can be peaceful, successful and effective.DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑17 Oct 2024, 08:04
Eritrea is an entity with a birth defect, it can never attain a normalcy hence after. The last over 35 years is only a testimony to this very fact. The old man can spend all he has but will never be able to straighten what was deformed at birth. The birth of Eritrea has to be revisited, reanalyzed and a meaningful solution should be sought.
Only because the time has elapsed over a long period of time can not legitimize the entity that was born with incurable defect.