DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑03 Jan 2020, 15:11
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑03 Jan 2020, 13:14
One would have to be in denial, or engaged in self deception, to assume that this belief of the minister was his alone.
Had haile selassie not also been of that belief, logic says, he would not have opposed so vehemently, the formation of the macha tulama self help association whose goals were developing oromo lands, building schools, roads, hospitals, clinics, spreading literacy, minamen, etc.
he would not have ordered haile mariam gamada, an intellectual and not a rebel or ''shifta,'' to be tortured to death for writing on oromo history and their struggle, same thing he did to frame mamo mazemir, the list goes on.
i think your internal bias and love for haile selassie the coward, makes you incapable of being impartial.
Self deception is when you had something that could nearly shows what you claim is official. When you don't have that sort of evidence it remains your wild assumption. The minister could have well entertained that sort of view, but to extrapolate that to be a policy issue is pure and wishful propaganda.
The banning of Mecha-Tulema Association could have been percipitated simply out a fear that today's EPP is having: self-assertion and autonomy could be in order, but taking that out of proportion and abuse your right to create a sort of competing entities in the name of authonomy may endanger the well-being of the nation as a whole. In today's Ethiopia our younth can't go out to visit a university in the so called autonomous regions outside of theirs and come back safely, any more. At least no more guaranteed. Some of those who are instigating such havoc have ironically went abroad to gain education in a foreign country without any kind of concern for their safety. After coming back or from the base they built abroad they are making the lives of those young men and women unbearble in their own country. Do you think that behaviour should be encouraged?
I am not condoning the banning itself, but still the banning could have been not only by the hands of those who you are trying to incriminate as a purely external imposition. Oromos were part and parcel of the whole system and the whole time. Do you think the Amharas,as an example, didn't face any injustice the whole time of the existence of the Ethiopian state?
In every democratic system today there is, unfortunately, a form of torture, it suffice to mention Guantanamo detention center, which is mostly reported in the media as a torturing center. Does that mean America is discriminating against a given group of people? Not that I know of.
Ha! You think that is his belief only, as if he would have a policy that would somehow, perhaps, contradict or be opposed to that of the hegemonic emperor, haile selassie. As if haile selassie would tolerate that, LOL. It's as if you are insulting the intelligence of us all, while showing your intenral biases that would never allow you to be impartial in this case.
One would be foolish to assume that, the Amhara elites did not see Oromo nationalism/Oromo Nationalists, as a threat to their grip on power.
Actions speak louder than words, as the age old adage goes; so we ignore the words and look at the actions:
1] the targeting of peaceful and civic Oromo organizations.
2] the framing of oromo nationalists for crimes, to ''justify'' killing them, torturing them, and other actions to neutralize them.
3] banning an oromo org. dedicated to educating their people, and uplifting them, and teaching them to be self sufficient; is an act that speaks volumes. It shows that someone powerful then, did not want oromos to do so. It's easier to suppress and subjugate a poor, backwards, and under-educated nation; than it is to oppress and subjugate an educated, conscious, and aware nation- adelem ende?
To even bring up America, in comparison to Ethiopia, is a sick joke my brother. I need not elaborate on that.
I did not blame Amaras in general, at all, I acknowledge they were just as poor as the rest of ethiopia, if not poorer in some cases; but they were not made into landless tenants forced to be extorted for most of their crops produce, as oromos in the south were.
and if we compare the number of oromos who worked from within the oppressive systems of the past, to the ones who suffered as a result of it; it's staggering. So yes, some oromos were ''part and parcel'' of the systems of the past; but the vast majority derived NO benefits from it, kind sir.