Mereja.Forum

[Naga Tuma]

You preferred to answer a question that was asked back in 2025 instead of those asked yesterday and you would have allot of your readers to believe you.

The question here is for a participant by the name eritrea to explain his own terms, such as “sacred truths” in the Old and New Testaments, divine connection, divine revelation, and a singular act while attempting to belittle local Ethiopian traditions that predate the Old and New Testaments and go all the way back to the time of the Pharaohs before The Exodus.

Evidently, this is beyond your comprehension to lecture.

If you are eritrea’s liaison, do you mind asking him to answer the question in light of new divine realizations after his claim?

There is nothing to qeustion eritrea is a sovreign nation really recognised by the AU and the UN Arab league IGAD
Ethiopia it self recognised Eritrea independence in 1993 after the referendum

Dr Zackovich

Without being a proponent of war but for the sake of argument without any expertise in international law, if it is established through a discovery process under the law that Meles Zenawi as a leader of Ethiopia was biased in favor of Eritrea and Eritrea was aware at the highest level of its leadership that Meles Zenawi wasn’t a neutral arbiter, can you cite any international law that doesn’t implicate both parties about the referendum process?

Even if one argues that the EPRDF was not democratically legitimate when it came to power in 1991, it was the effective governing authority of Ethiopia at the time it exercised control over the state apparatus, administered the territory, and conducted foreign relations.

In international law, effective control and recognition generally outweigh questions of internal legitimacy. The United Nations, the Organisation of African Unity (OAU, now AU), and the international community all recognised the EPRDF as the lawful government of Ethiopia. Once a government is recognised and acts on behalf of the state, its acts are considered legally attributable to the state itself, not to the ruling party.

Even if one later challenges the legitimacy of a former government, its international acts remain binding upon the state. Otherwise, international relations would become chaotic, with every new regime repudiating its predecessors’ treaties, recognitions, or borders. This principle ex factis jus oritur law arises from facts ensures continuity and stability in the international order indeed.


Dr Zackovich

There is no principle of international law requiring a head of government or state to act as a neutral arbiter in matters concerning self determination or constitutional settlement. Any alleged bias on the part of a political leader is, in itself, a matter of political judgement rather than legal consequence. Absent evidence of coercion, fraud, corruption, or another recognised defect in the legal process, bias alone does not invalidate a referendum or give rise to international legal responsibility.

Meles Zenawi brought the armed conflict over Eritrean independence to an end and recognised the right of the Eritrean people to determine their own political future. That right was exercised through a referendum conducted under the supervision of the United Nations, in accordance with the applicable legal framework and accepted democratic standards. The referendum was carried out lawfully, peacefully, and transparently, and its outcome received broad international recognition.

Dr Zackovich

I merely answered the question regarding Eritrea and its diplomatic recogntion political independence and how it came to be
I dont care for ur bible dont believe in it its a fabricated book with allot of contradictions nor am i a christian to care for it


Dr Zackovich

[Zack]

i talked about the topic at hand mentioned above not some book we dont know who the authors are

[Naga Tuma]

Yet, you chose to be an imposter for the character in it.

i talked about the topic at hand mentioned above not some book we dont know who the authors are

[Zack]

Yet, you chose to be an imposter for the character in it.

i talked about the topic at hand mentioned above not some book we dont know who the authors are

Which character what imposter why do u always speak in riddles why don’t u just say what u mean. And mean what u say

Can’t be that hard
This topic is about some one wants. To nulify the Eritrean statehood from a legal point of view and I came with facts
And ur talking about the bible and what not and ancient Egyptian dear lad ur all over the place. Mayaasir as the Arabs would say

Dr Zackovich

[Naga Tuma]

You write allot. You can read ደብዳቤ ሉበ አብተዉ ከበደ ፉፋ።

Yet, you chose to be an imposter for the character in it.

i talked about the topic at hand mentioned above not some book we dont know who the authors are

Which character what imposter why do u always speak in riddles why don’t u just say what u mean. And mean what u say

Can’t be that hard
This topic is about some one wants. To nulify the Eritrean statehood from a legal point of view and I came with facts
And ur talking about the bible and what not and ancient Egyptian dear lad ur all over the place. Mayaasir as the Arabs would say

Dr Zackovich