Mereja.Forum

[Naga Tuma]

Meet Queen Tiye as well, the mother of Pharaoh Akhenaten, which means the mother of Moses, if Sigmund Freud and Ahmed Osman aren’t wrong.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=50570 ... bVwvIn0%3D

[Naga Tuma]

Renaissance men have multiple sources.

The old Bible is not the best of them. It may be for the uninitiated.

I didn’t want to waste my time, either. Your writing forced me to respond.

You can act more Catholic than the Pope.

Freud, an Israelite?

He was an Ashkenazi Jew. A khazar. Probably, originally from Ukraine or Poland. And he had syfilis and took cocaine. People with syfilis get deranged and talk a bunch of nonsense.

And you put his words over the Bible?

Man, please shut up. Don't waste my time.

Meet the Israelite Sigmund Freud who was living in Germany. I don’t think you are more Israelite than him unless it becomes more Catholic than the Pope.

He published a book titled Moses and Monotheism in Germany in 1939, which must have been during the propaganda of the Nazis.

His book was a forensic analysis to prove that Moses was not an Israelite, that he was an Egyptian Pharaoh, that it was that Pharaoh, not the Israelites, that said the chosen people. That means the idea of the chosen people was imposed upon them from without and he implicated Moses for that.

Now, imagine why anyone would publish such a forensic study of ancient history to disown the idea of the chosen people at a time when the people who called themselves Arians started to propagate the superior race for a similar kind of status.

You be the judge after meeting Sigmund Freud.

Then meet Ahmed Osman who concurred with Sigmund Freud and identified Pharaoh Akhenaton to be the Egyptian Pharaoh that Sigmund Freud wrote about circa 1939 in Germany.

Pharaoh Akhenaten is known to be the first documented Monotheist on planet Earth, which makes him the Pharaoh par excellence, at least in my view.

Then meet Horus of this forum who was called upon to correct and complete this history that was thrown at all of us to the south of thee and failed to do so, so far.

It is truly sad if you did not know about this history of generations past and generations to come and thought that you fully understood about the Second World War.

What is your source then, if not the Bible? At least if you tell me that, I can check it and then respond.

As of now though, I completely disagree. He grew up in the royal household and was surely given some title and responsibility, but he was never the Pharaoh. Long before him Joseph was made the ruler of Egypt, because he helped the Pharaoh of his time in interpreting the disturbing dream he had.

Both Joseph and Moses, were Israelites.

My source IS NOT the old Bible.

A very simple question for you.

Moses was the Pharaoh par excellence.

Use whatever source you may, do you agree or disagree?

My source is the Bible, pagan. What's yours? The demons inside you?

Zmeselo:

It wasn’t without a reason that a while back on this forum, I called you uninitiated.

You have come here as a solid proof for my allegation.

Moses was the Pharaoh par excellence, according to at least two scholars.

We will come to that.

For the time being, can you logically say the Pharaoh par excellence was a child in another Pharaoh’s household and rose to challenge the latter?

Put simply, you have become the latest causality of the paradox of the almighty.

Now, you have some logical thing to wonder about for the rest of your life. We are discussing here about world history of generations past as well as generations to come.

What a tragedy? What a revelation?

Henceforth, you have become a student of both the first Renaissance as well as the second Renaissance.

Please let us know when you feel you have been initiated.

Thank you Elias Kifle University. With this thank you, I demand that I be recognized as its Professor because I have been teaching at this University for more than 18 years now.

Of course, I am joking about my demand.

[Selam/]

Shabo also acts more Ethiopian than ፋንታሁን ሸዋንቆጨው!

[Naga Tuma]

The question to agree or disagree whether Moses was the Pharaoh par excellence stands.

So far, Zmeselo stated that he completely disagreed but for a source for the question.

He discredited the first source he was provided.

So, I assume that he stands behind his initial statement that he completely disagrees that Moses was the Pharaoh par excellence.

Fed_Up has avoided answering the question, so far.

sesame, the question concerns you as well.

Do you agree or disagree that Moses was the Pharaoh par excellence?

[Selam/]

[Zmeselo]

Ok, if relying on AI helps you sleep at night.

[Selam/]

[Zmeselo]

[Selam/]

[Selam/]

[Naga Tuma]

And you put his words over the Bible?

I can’t get over this statement.

Enter the first century BC and you find De rerum natura, which means On the nature of things.

Enter 325 AD and you find the First Council of Nicaea.

Enter the early 15th century and you find a rediscovery of De rerum natura by Poggio Bracciolini, which would be after some 16 long centuries.

The rediscovery of De rerum natura essentially became the source of the first Renaissance and put the old Bible in the backseat.

Enter 1776 and you find the writing of the U.S. Constitution, which led to the separation of Church and State.

Enter circa 1885 and you find the Red Sea coastline fall under the influence of Italy. This would be more than 400 years after the rediscovery of De rerum natura.

Enter 1939 and you find Sigmund Freud’s Moses and Monotheism book published in Germany. He established in his book that Moses was an Egyptian Pharaoh.

Enter 1964 E.C. and you find the late Ethiopian Laureate Tsegaye Ghebremedhin’s six words: ቃሉ የማይቀለበስ ቃሉ … ለካ ኣንተ ነህ!

Enter October 2025 and you find an Eritrean ideologue ask if I put Sigmund Freud’s words over the old Bible.

It feels he didn’t get a memo from Florence in Italy about the source of the first Renaissance that put the old Bible in the backseat or from the writing of the U.S. Constitution in Philadelphia in 1776.

[Right]

Rotten and rat infested buildings built 100 years ago by Italians are a pride of today’s shameful lazy Eritreans.

[Selam/]