![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
How long should be the waiting?
The syrian rebels were riding on the back of tanks. Amazing. It appears, they are armed to teeth. For sure either the Turks or some one has charged them enough. Fano is doing all current damage to julias ወንበር ጠባቂ ቄሮ without drones and tanks and may be artilery. When Fano gets some of this gadgets, the “God chosens” shall be history. That is our intellectual prophesy-not fetched from waqa or the devil
If anything is certain so far, then it is the certain fall of Syria into the club of the likes of Iraq, Libya, Somalia and more. And you are quick in wishing the same for Ethiopia, exposing yourself thereby one more time.
Shut up "ጉሊቻ". Anything is better than youDefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39If anything is certain so far, then it is the certain fall of Syria into the club of the likes of Iraq, Libya, Somalia and more. And you are quick in wishing the same for Ethiopia, exposing yourself thereby one more time.
The time of toppling a established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability is the thing of the past, we can list many examples in the region and around the world.
Those who came by the power of the gun can only go by another power of the gun, case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia, Eritrea's EPLF is still in the waiting room.
The problem is not what you are scribbling under multiple nicks every single day while there are also many who will willingly subscribe to your diatribe, the core problem is rather something different, you can have a look at it here:
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=354457
If TPLF has gone by 'power of the gun' as you stated, then whoever came after them MUST have come by power of the gun. Toppling an established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability wouldn't be a thing of the past. Your capacity to believe in two contradictory propositions to be both true in the same time amazes me.DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
Those who came by the power of the gun can only go by another power of the gun, case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia
DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
The time of toppling a established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability is the thing of the past
sarcasm wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 12:15Mutually exclusive statements cannot be both true
If TPLF has gone by 'power of the gun' as you stated, then whoever came after them MUST have come by power of the gun. Toppling an established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability wouldn't be a thing of the past. Your capacity to believe in two contradictory propositions to be both true in the same time amazes me.DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
Those who came by the power of the gun can only go by another power of the gun, case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia
Also, it would be also be natural for those who came after TPLF to go by power of the gun as per your logic. (Remember you stated TPLF went by by power of the gun).
DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
The time of toppling a established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability is the thing of the past
Hi Defend,DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 14:09sarcasm,
even if we disagree on any of the political views of our country, I think of you as someone that doesn't believe in a blind denial of the facts on the ground.
TPLF came to power by a means of gun violence, toppling the preceding government of the Derg. Then it stayed on for over 3 decades. After it was forced out by means of public revolt, mind you this was not a violent usurpation of power but peaceful, still didn't want to come into terms with it and opened a war of insurrection against the state to topple this one too, in the year 2020. You forgot that? It was defeated by the means its own choice.
Did I add anything?
The clique in Eritrea is still in the waiting to face the same fate to that of TPLF.
Are you telling me means of violence can stabilize a state after grab of state power? In that case you could be the most sought after advisor for many places in the world, like in Libya, Iraq, Yemen, Syria and many more to lend your thoughts on that. You could be paid in millions if you can help them achieve a stable government.
sarcasm wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 12:15Mutually exclusive statements cannot be both true
If TPLF has gone by 'power of the gun' as you stated, then whoever came after them MUST have come by power of the gun. Toppling an established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability wouldn't be a thing of the past. Your capacity to believe in two contradictory propositions to be both true in the same time amazes me.DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
Those who came by the power of the gun can only go by another power of the gun, case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia
Also, it would be also be natural for those who came after TPLF to go by power of the gun as per your logic. (Remember you stated TPLF went by by power of the gun).
DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑08 Dec 2024, 09:39
The time of toppling a established administration by means of violence and hoping for stability is the thing of the past
Hi sarcasm,sarcasm wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 06:02
Hi Defend,
If you are talking about ruling Tigray, then the statement "Those who came by the power of the gun can only go by another power of the gun case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia" is false as TPLF is still ruling Tigray staring from 1980s.
Hi Defend,
sarcasm wrote: ↑09 Dec 2024, 09:21Hi Defend,
Ok. In regards to power in federal government:
Has the TPLF lost power by the power of gun?
If Yes, then whoever came after TPLF "can only go by another power of the gun" per your logic.
If No, then then the statement "case in point in our own vicinity are the likes of TPLF of Ethiopia" is false.