Mereja.Forum

[Cigar]

…….that there are no domestic tigrigna or amharic words which have the letter (phonetic) P?
Prove me wrong.

[Yimer]

This is P in Amharic, dummy.

ፒ
ፒ
ፐ
ፑ
ፒ
ፓ
ፔ
ፖ
ፗ

Poland… ፖላንድ
Pakistan… ፓኪስታን

[Cigar]

Yimer the low IQed, illiterate, funfun, member of the 120 million rats Ethiopians, I said domestic WORDS.
Poland, Police, Pakistan are not Amharic words.
Try again.

[Yimer]

Yimer the low IQed, illiterate, funfun, member of the 120 million rats Ethiopians, I said domestic WORDS.
Poland, Police, Pakistan are not Amharic words.
Try again.

We have ጰ instead of P. We don’t have to have “P”.

Ethiopia = ኢትዮጵያ
Peter = ጴጥሮስ

Amharic is also unique in that it has “ጠ”, "ጨ", "ፀ", "ቀ", "ዥ" etc. This makes Amharic one of the richest languages, and the only native African language with its own alphabets. Why don’t you see our strengths? You just found the lack of P, but ignored ጰ.

[Abere]

Cigar, Nigerain boys ፓፓ. Girl, Nigerians are taking dumps in your skinny arse Hope answering this question helps you answers your Ascari arse. Why did Amharic/Ethiopic/ alphabet have <ፐ> is as old as Ethiopic alphabets itself?

…….that there are no domestic tigrigna or amharic words which have the letter (phonetic) P?
Prove me wrong.

[Cigar]

Yimer the idiot stick to the subject. ethioPia is not Amharic either.
As far as Amharic kid rich language tell that to your shermu’tta mom.
You call both the brothers of your mom and dad UNCLE, the sisters of your mom and father AUNTIES is as weak and as stupid as English.
Your alphabets are copy pasted from Eritrean tigrigna (stolen that is). You still have like 5 alphabets in your list of alphabets which are stolen from our tigrigna which you can’t pronounce and don’t use in your daily Amharic conversation. Eritrean tigrigna is the richest language in the world.
You don’t have distinctive pronouns which can identify a collective of males, females, mixed genders. Unlike in Eritrean tigrigna no freaking person will understand if you are talking about young men, young women, mixed genders young men and women….the same with elderly men or women in singular or plural forms. Enesu, Enante, ebakacu in Amharic doesn’t pin point whether you are talking about males, females, mixed genders or adults of different genders. In tigrigna we have distinct pronounces for all.
The thing is since you don’t freaking know Tigrigna language you assume that Amharic is rich language. Well it is not. Again Amharic is as fu’cked language as English.
And finally stay focus on the topic of the thread instead of digressing and make your self prove that you and your 120 million rat Ethiopians are stupid who brag while they walk with their bu’tt naked selves.

[Cigar]

Amharic, ebakachu for all genders.
Tigrigna, bejakhum for young men, bejakhin for young women, bejakhatkum for plural.

Amharic, agot, akist both..father and mother side.
Tigrigna, uncle akoy mother side, uncle hawoboy father side.
Amoy auntie, father side and hatiney auntie, mother side.


Amharic, endemi alachu for every freaking body.
Tigrigna, kemey alkhum for men, kemey alkhin for females, kemey alekhatkum for plural which includes both genders.

I can list millions of such examples. If you a’ss wipes are smart you should have wondered how is this possible instead of trying to tell us that you have a language.
Again, your stupid assumption is because you don’t understand tigrigna.
So shut the fu’ck up.
Amharic and agamigna are stolen from Eritrean tigrigna and didn’t go to fully developed stage.
That is just the fact you idiots.

[Abere]

You are talking sh!t Naturally, Eritrea is Tigre. I mean less of Afar, Kunama, Baria, etc tribes is Tigre. I do not know what sh!t it is, you call also yourself Tigrawi - but we all know you by Tigre. In Amharic, Tigre literally means in my feet,ተ'ግሬ. The name of the land is Bahir Negash. So, do not fool yourself. No, sh!t knows what Eritrea means, other than old Italians.

Amharic and agamigna are stolen from Eritrean tigrigna and didn’t go to fully developed stage.
That is just the fact you idiots.

[Cigar]

Abere you can call us what pleases you, but we are not tigre. We are Eritreans who have 9 different ethnic groups.
Calling us tigre is admitting that you are RATS as I call you.
Are you rats ? Of course not. But I call you to degrade you. And the same principle goes when you call us tigres. Because you as agame don’t like your tigreism (it is an insult to your tribe) and are using to insult us.
We are Eritreans .
I can call your filthy mom a shermu’tta. Is she? You tell me.

[Abere]

Cigar

You are fearking Tigre,ተ'ግሬ. The here and there , few provincial differences in accent and slight modifics in words is dialect. The English of Northern States of America slightly varies in accent and even in some words from Southern States of America, yet they are Americans. Just like the Amharic accent of Gondar differs from Gojjam or Wolo or Shewa, yet they all are Amhara. Bahir Midir ( less other tribes) speaks Tigrigna. There is nothing shame to be proud of who you are, either you came from Yemeni Al Akadam (Al-Muhamashīn) tribe or hybrid of Amhara + Agew or other Cushite's. The first essence of "independence" is self-esteem and confidence, not run away with stolen land and people, fraudulently - you are still living with the victim mentality of colonization of low-esteem and inferiority complex. You are Habesha, Tigre. Period.

[Cigar]

Abere the idiot, you are making my point you dumb a’ss. Patwa is a bastaralised version of English, American English is [deleted] version of the British English as is Aussies English or the English speaking Africans just like Criol is [deleted] version of French and so agamigna and Amharic are [deleted] version of Eritrean tigrigna.
There is a fact of originality and emulation or coping.
I explained to you the difference of richness between tigrigna, agamigna and Amharic already.
You can’t bring me any evidence like I brought you to convince me or any Eritrean that your two [deleted] languages’s superiority over Eritrean tigrigna.
I did and you still are telling me 2+2=5 or as we say in the pure, very developed Eritrean tigrigna:
“Ezias walla tinfer ember tiel iya”
Translation:
You are saying “ even if I see it flying, I still say that is a goat “ you goat face.

[Somaliman]

No wonder Cigar calls you rats, though he should apologise to the poor rats for making them synonymous with Ethiopians!

You don't fuc'king understand sh.it. Neither do you know sh.it about what you're talking about, you little fuc'kers!

Cigar has made a clear statement, and has also asked you a straightforward question, which is easy to understand without requiring too much thought, yet one is talking out of his ar.se, and the baboon who calls himself Abere, not only is he a semi-illiterate, but also an idiot of the highest order.

This is P in Amharic, dummy.

What's the point of having letter "P" in a language in which there's no a single fuc'king word with a "P" sound!

Claiming that Amharic is "one of the richest languages" proves only your low level of education and nothing else. I hope you at least know that the fuc'king Amharic is full of Arabic words.


BTW, is it the fuc'king raw meat that you eat that makes you such muppets!

[Sadacha Macca]

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language? If so, let's find it, bring it forth and then see which is indeed the ''superior language.'' Mind you, I am not taking sides here, since I do not know enough Amharic and Kebessa Tigrinya to make the comparison or etc.
Here, you're just showing your biased against one language and for another, which is natural, but isn't sufficient as proof for establishing the superiority of one language over another.
Kebessa Tigrinya is of course superior to you, because it's your mother tongue. EVEN IF somehow, Amharic, or some other language, were 'superior,' a biased person would not admit that, no?
There is no 'P' in Arabic either, and since betting is forbidden in my religion, I won't bet; but I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

[Somaliman]

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language? If so, let's find it, bring it forth and then see which is indeed the ''superior language.'' Mind you, I am not taking sides here, since I do not know enough Amharic and Kebessa Tigrinya to make the comparison or etc.
Here, you're just showing your biased against one language and for another, which is natural, but isn't sufficient as proof for establishing the superiority of one language over another.
Kebessa Tigrinya is of course superior to you, because it's your mother tongue. EVEN IF somehow, Amharic, or some other language, were 'superior,' a biased person would not admit that, no?
There is no 'P' in Arabic either, and since betting is forbidden in my religion, I won't bet; but I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language?

I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

You must be suffering from what's called "Cognitive dissonance", or an internal conflict, which is when someone’s actions do not align with their beliefs.

You're asking whether "an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language" is out there, yet you're telling us that Arabic is richer than Tigrinya, without even trying to find an answer to your question in order to sort of validate your conclusion!

[Sadacha Macca]

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language? If so, let's find it, bring it forth and then see which is indeed the ''superior language.'' Mind you, I am not taking sides here, since I do not know enough Amharic and Kebessa Tigrinya to make the comparison or etc.
Here, you're just showing your biased against one language and for another, which is natural, but isn't sufficient as proof for establishing the superiority of one language over another.
Kebessa Tigrinya is of course superior to you, because it's your mother tongue. EVEN IF somehow, Amharic, or some other language, were 'superior,' a biased person would not admit that, no?
There is no 'P' in Arabic either, and since betting is forbidden in my religion, I won't bet; but I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language?

I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

You must be suffering from what's called "Cognitive dissonance", or an internal conflict, which is when someone’s actions do not align with their beliefs.

You're asking whether "an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language" is out there, yet you're telling us that Arabic is richer than Tigrinya, without even trying to find an answer to your question in order to sort of validate your conclusion!

Abyssinia Lady aka Eden aka Zack aka Somaliman,


Beloved Tegaru bro-sis, no, it's because I love Arabic more than any other language, since it's the language of my religion.
So, yes, I am biased and admit it; hence the reason why I said that cigar being biased is natural and understandable.
BUT, I did question if such a metric existed and if so, present it; otherwise, what do we base superiority of one language over another, on?
The absence or presence of words with a 'P'? Or? Do you have a clue, other than insults, and ''galla go to madagascar'' and other immature, child-like insults, despite the fact that you're at least 60 years old and along with cigar, should be more mature than all of us and be able to impart knowledge/wisdom upon us all?

[Cigar]

Sadacha I give you the metric that Eritrean tigrigna is superior to agamigna and Amharic. I didn’t say that the letter (Phonetic) P is also in our domestic words.
So why are you saying that is my comparison when I judged your language inferiority to my language.
Now tell me what you call the brother of your father and mother as well as the sisters of your father and mother. This is a tiny if examples I provided you earlier. Go check them out. Now, to all your answers to the questions I asked you above in Eritrean tigrigna, they all have names or pronouns to identify exactly who they are. In your [deleted]’ized Amharic or agamigna if on of them died run over by a train, and tell your family member that he got run over by a train they all will ask you which one. Right.
In Eritrean tigrigna, they will know who you are talking about just by the pronoun. Are you getting it. And again, I can tell you millions of such examples.
Now why are you a’ss holes change the subject. Why are you saying that there is no P in Somali language. I was comparing Eritrean tigrigna and your basta’rd languages. I don’t know if Somali has P or not. But your Ethiopian lame excuses are always…. Why the bad things be associated with Ethiopia only….let’s bring others too.

[Zack]

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language? If so, let's find it, bring it forth and then see which is indeed the ''superior language.'' Mind you, I am not taking sides here, since I do not know enough Amharic and Kebessa Tigrinya to make the comparison or etc.
Here, you're just showing your biased against one language and for another, which is natural, but isn't sufficient as proof for establishing the superiority of one language over another.
Kebessa Tigrinya is of course superior to you, because it's your mother tongue. EVEN IF somehow, Amharic, or some other language, were 'superior,' a biased person would not admit that, no?
There is no 'P' in Arabic either, and since betting is forbidden in my religion, I won't bet; but I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language?

I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

You must be suffering from what's called "Cognitive dissonance", or an internal conflict, which is when someone’s actions do not align with their beliefs.

You're asking whether "an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language" is out there, yet you're telling us that Arabic is richer than Tigrinya, without even trying to find an answer to your question in order to sort of validate your conclusion!

Abyssinia Lady aka Eden aka Zack aka Somaliman,


Beloved Tegaru bro-sis, no, it's because I love Arabic more than any other language, since it's the language of my religion.
So, yes, I am biased and admit it; hence the reason why I said that cigar being biased is natural and understandable.
BUT, I did question if such a metric existed and if so, present it; otherwise, what do we base superiority of one language over another, on?
The absence or presence of words with a 'P'? Or? Do you have a clue, other than insults, and ''galla go to madagascar'' and other immature, child-like insults, despite the fact that you're at least 60 years old and along with cigar, should be more mature than all of us and be able to impart knowledge/wisdom upon us all?

Dear Galla,

Your affinity for the Arabic language, rooted in its significance to your religion, is entirely understandable and respected. Bias towards a beloved language is a natural human tendency. However, when we engage in discussions about the superiority of one language over another, it is crucial to ground our arguments in objective criteria rather than subjective preferences. In this context, it becomes evident that Tigrinya, Arabic, and Hebrew share the same linguistic roots, and none can be considered superior to the others from a linguistic perspective.

Language superiority is a complex and multifaceted topic that cannot be adequately assessed based on isolated features, such as the presence or absence of certain phonemes. Instead, linguistic richness, historical impact, cultural significance, and practical utility are among the factors that might be considered when evaluating the merits of different languages.

It is essential to approach such discussions with respect and intellectual rigor, avoiding derogatory remarks and personal insults. Mature and constructive dialogue fosters a deeper understanding and appreciation of our linguistic and cultural diversity.


Dr Zackovich

[Sadacha Macca]

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language? If so, let's find it, bring it forth and then see which is indeed the ''superior language.'' Mind you, I am not taking sides here, since I do not know enough Amharic and Kebessa Tigrinya to make the comparison or etc.
Here, you're just showing your biased against one language and for another, which is natural, but isn't sufficient as proof for establishing the superiority of one language over another.
Kebessa Tigrinya is of course superior to you, because it's your mother tongue. EVEN IF somehow, Amharic, or some other language, were 'superior,' a biased person would not admit that, no?
There is no 'P' in Arabic either, and since betting is forbidden in my religion, I won't bet; but I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

Is there an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language?

I'd say that Arabic is richer than Kebessa Tigrinya.

You must be suffering from what's called "Cognitive dissonance", or an internal conflict, which is when someone’s actions do not align with their beliefs.

You're asking whether "an impartial, fair, unbiased metric for what makes one language ''richer'' than another language" is out there, yet you're telling us that Arabic is richer than Tigrinya, without even trying to find an answer to your question in order to sort of validate your conclusion!

Abyssinia Lady aka Eden aka Zack aka Somaliman,


Beloved Tegaru bro-sis, no, it's because I love Arabic more than any other language, since it's the language of my religion.
So, yes, I am biased and admit it; hence the reason why I said that cigar being biased is natural and understandable.
BUT, I did question if such a metric existed and if so, present it; otherwise, what do we base superiority of one language over another, on?
The absence or presence of words with a 'P'? Or? Do you have a clue, other than insults, and ''galla go to madagascar'' and other immature, child-like insults, despite the fact that you're at least 60 years old and along with cigar, should be more mature than all of us and be able to impart knowledge/wisdom upon us all?

Dear Galla,

Your affinity for the Arabic language, rooted in its significance to your religion, is entirely understandable and respected. Bias towards a beloved language is a natural human tendency. However, when we engage in discussions about the superiority of one language over another, it is crucial to ground our arguments in objective criteria rather than subjective preferences. In this context, it becomes evident that Tigrinya, Arabic, and Hebrew share the same linguistic roots, and none can be considered superior to the others from a linguistic perspective.

Language superiority is a complex and multifaceted topic that cannot be adequately assessed based on isolated features, such as the presence or absence of certain phonemes. Instead, linguistic richness, historical impact, cultural significance, and practical utility are among the factors that might be considered when evaluating the merits of different languages.

It is essential to approach such discussions with respect and intellectual rigor, avoiding derogatory remarks and personal insults. Mature and constructive dialogue fosters a deeper understanding and appreciation of our linguistic and cultural diversity.


Dr Zackovich

Dear Agame brother-sister eden aka abyssinialady aka sarcasm aka somaliman
Okay, then what are your ''objective criteria's'', in which one can say 1 language is superior in comparison to another one? You, cigar, and your other account(s) have yet to post anything to substantiate such claims. The lack of 'P' isn't sufficient, either. Just because those languages are related, doesn't mean that one cannot be superior in comparison to another; unless you have irrefutable proof from actual linguistic experts/professors/etc, and if you do: feel free to share their studies and findings, as opposed to just saying stuff like everyone else here.
Thank you in advance my tigrayan brother/sister/we/they/him/her, zack aka somaliman aka eden aka abyssinialady aka sarcasm.


The Oromo who loves to learn,
Mr. Sadachaovich

[Somaliman]

Zack,

I've long stopped discussing with this guy, as it's an exercise in futility. I just drop my comments with regard to his comments/posts.

How can you discuss with someone who's calling you five names and is referring to you as he/she/they, in the first place?

Besides, he's blabbering on about Arabic, but I'm quite sure his Arabic is rudimentary and, trust me, I'm generous when I say his Arabic, as I don't really believe that he speaks Arabic. Speaking rudimentary Arabic and roughly understanding Koranic verses does not necessarily mean speaking Arabic.

[Zack]

Engaging in meaningful discussion requires mutual respect and a willingness to engage with differing viewpoints, all he does is call u names and call u different personalities . It’s understandable to disengage from conversations that are meaningless and Childish.

Galla madowdu maskaxda caruur bay ka yihin , how can i be eden and u at the same time.

Dr Zackovich