Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
Bravo Eritrea! You're leading Africa by example.

-
Hameddibewoyane
- Member
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: 25 Sep 2019, 02:42
Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
This is a must listen to understand the noble thinking and goals of shabia… I luv it in the middle he mentioned about my favorite topic nedadi drill drill drill
Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
Selina Mulugeta EDF // New Eritrean Music 2023
Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
The fertlizer trap
The cost of chemical fertilisers in both the global North and South has skyrocketed over the past two years and is putting severe economic strain on farmers’ and public budgets.
G20 nations paid almost twice as much for key fertiliser imports in 2021 compared to 2020 and are on course to spend three times as much in 2022 — an additional cost of at least US$ 21.8 billion. For example, the UK paid an extra US$ 144 million for fertiliser imports in 2021 and 2022, and Brazil paid an extra US$ 3.5 billion.
Nine developing countries are on course to pay three times more in 2022 than they did in 2020. These countries include Pakistan, which paid an extra US$ 874 million, and Ethiopia, which paid an extra US$ 384 million in 2021 and 2022.
The world’s largest fertiliser companies are making record profits as farmers struggle to cope with increased prices. Nine of the world’s largest fertiliser companies are expected to make US$ 57 billion in profit in 2022, up more than fourfold from two years ago; their profits in 2021 and 2022 are on course to come to a total of US$ 84 billion.
THE EVIDENCE ON FARMING WITHOUT CHEMICALS
Agroecology — which does not involve the use of chemical fertilisers — is often criticised for reducing food production. However, there is a growing body of research showing how agroecology provides “immense economic, social and food security benefits while ensuring climate justice and restoring soils and the environment.”
https://www.iatp.org/the-fertiliser-trap
https://www.iatp.org/the -fertiliser-trap
The cost of chemical fertilisers in both the global North and South has skyrocketed over the past two years and is putting severe economic strain on farmers’ and public budgets.
G20 nations paid almost twice as much for key fertiliser imports in 2021 compared to 2020 and are on course to spend three times as much in 2022 — an additional cost of at least US$ 21.8 billion. For example, the UK paid an extra US$ 144 million for fertiliser imports in 2021 and 2022, and Brazil paid an extra US$ 3.5 billion.
Nine developing countries are on course to pay three times more in 2022 than they did in 2020. These countries include Pakistan, which paid an extra US$ 874 million, and Ethiopia, which paid an extra US$ 384 million in 2021 and 2022.
The world’s largest fertiliser companies are making record profits as farmers struggle to cope with increased prices. Nine of the world’s largest fertiliser companies are expected to make US$ 57 billion in profit in 2022, up more than fourfold from two years ago; their profits in 2021 and 2022 are on course to come to a total of US$ 84 billion.
THE EVIDENCE ON FARMING WITHOUT CHEMICALS
Agroecology — which does not involve the use of chemical fertilisers — is often criticised for reducing food production. However, there is a growing body of research showing how agroecology provides “immense economic, social and food security benefits while ensuring climate justice and restoring soils and the environment.”
https://www.iatp.org/the-fertiliser-trap
https://www.iatp.org/the -fertiliser-trap
Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
Thank you, Tiago, that was informative!Tiago wrote: ↑30 May 2023, 20:51The fertlizer trap
The cost of chemical fertilisers in both the global North and South has skyrocketed over the past two years and is putting severe economic strain on farmers’ and public budgets.
G20 nations paid almost twice as much for key fertiliser imports in 2021 compared to 2020 and are on course to spend three times as much in 2022 — an additional cost of at least US$ 21.8 billion. For example, the UK paid an extra US$ 144 million for fertiliser imports in 2021 and 2022, and Brazil paid an extra US$ 3.5 billion.
Nine developing countries are on course to pay three times more in 2022 than they did in 2020. These countries include Pakistan, which paid an extra US$ 874 million, and Ethiopia, which paid an extra US$ 384 million in 2021 and 2022.
The world’s largest fertiliser companies are making record profits as farmers struggle to cope with increased prices. Nine of the world’s largest fertiliser companies are expected to make US$ 57 billion in profit in 2022, up more than fourfold from two years ago; their profits in 2021 and 2022 are on course to come to a total of US$ 84 billion.
THE EVIDENCE ON FARMING WITHOUT CHEMICALS
Agroecology — which does not involve the use of chemical fertilisers — is often criticised for reducing food production. However, there is a growing body of research showing how agroecology provides “immense economic, social and food security benefits while ensuring climate justice and restoring soils and the environment.”
https://www.iatp.org/the-fertiliser-trap
https://www.iatp.org/the -fertiliser-trap
Re: Produced in Eritrea: Natural fertilizers produced from seaweed and fish byproducts!!!!!!!!
Colluli potash made in Eritrea coming soon for the rescue 2024