ህዝቢ ከባቢ ሰርዓ፡ ቀላይብዓቲት፡ ሓድሽ ዓዲ፡ ዓዲ ጎዶ፡ ዓዲ ግሃድ፡ ዑና ዋጦት፡ ተኸላቢ፡ ቀርጸቐምጠ፡ ቅናፍና፡ ገነተሰባ፡ ማይ ዓይንን ኮዓቲትን ምስ ሰራዊት ቅያ ኣብ ጎላጉል ሃዘሞ ዝገበሮ ናይ አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም እንግዶት።
አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
ህዝቢ ከባቢ ሰርዓ፡ ቀላይብዓቲት፡ ሓድሽ ዓዲ፡ ዓዲ ጎዶ፡ ዓዲ ግሃድ፡ ዑና ዋጦት፡ ተኸላቢ፡ ቀርጸቐምጠ፡ ቅናፍና፡ ገነተሰባ፡ ማይ ዓይንን ኮዓቲትን ምስ ሰራዊት ቅያ ኣብ ጎላጉል ሃዘሞ ዝገበሮ ናይ አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም እንግዶት።
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
___________
Eritreans in the UK commemorated the 33anniversary of Fenkil under the theme “Fenkil- Resolute Commitment”, that was highlighted by cultural and artistic programs. Participants on their part, expressed readiness to stand alongside the people and play due part in national affairs. Yared Tesfay
Last edited by Zmeselo on 17 Feb 2023, 14:07, edited 3 times in total.
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
ዶብ ከይተሓንጸጸ ክንድዚ ጓይላ ካብተገብረ፡ ምስተሓንጸጸ ጎላጉል ሃዘሞ ምስ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ብሓፈሻ ከመዪ ዓይነት ጓይላ ከርእየና'ኡ!
https://mereja.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=308857& "ፊዚካል ዲማርኬሽን" ምስተገብረ ዚግበር ጓይላ እቲ ዝበለጸ ጓይላ ኺኸውን'ዩ፤ ቢልና ንግምት ንሕና ኤርትራውያን ደያኑ ማእከልን መስመርን ብኤርትራዊ ጭዉነት ሓበንን ፍናንን!
https://mereja.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=308857& "ፊዚካል ዲማርኬሽን" ምስተገብረ ዚግበር ጓይላ እቲ ዝበለጸ ጓይላ ኺኸውን'ዩ፤ ቢልና ንግምት ንሕና ኤርትራውያን ደያኑ ማእከልን መስመርን ብኤርትራዊ ጭዉነት ሓበንን ፍናንን!
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
The
Rahel Daniel & Eritrea team are ready to conquer the World Athletics Cross Country Championships, Bathurst 2023. Rahel Daniel has dominated the World Athletics Cross Country Tour and currently tops the season standings, thanks to her three victories last month.
__________
#TdRwanda23- Team Arrival.
For the first time since 2011, Daniel Teklehaimanot is back in Rwanda. The winner of the 2nd edition, is back with Eritrea. The Red Sea Camels, have already animated the Tour du Rwanda with 4 yellow jerseys (2010, 2019, 2020, 2022) 𝗧𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗱𝘂 𝗥𝘄𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮: @tour_du_Rwanda
Ema, still looking trim.
ሃገራዊት ጋንታ ኤርትራ (ኣግማል ቀይሕ ባሕሪ) ጠርኒፋ ናብ ርዋንዳ ኣምሪሓ ዘላ ዋዕሮ መንእሰይ፡ ሚርያም ሃብታይ።
_______

Congratulations
Last edited by Zmeselo on 17 Feb 2023, 14:04, edited 1 time in total.
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
Editorial:
The Follies of US “Containment Policy’’
Feb 17, 2023
International news has been dominated of late by a high-pitched acrimony between Washington and Beijing. The purported trigger-point was the rather massive unmanned airship or Balloon from China that floated over US airspace at over 60,000ft. for a number of days.
The Chinese side maintained from the outset that the airship was a “civilian aircraft with limited self-steering capability that entered US airspace unintentionally due to force majeure”.
Beijing further underlined that the Balloon and its payload were exclusively “designed for meteorological data collection and research with no sinister military capability or threat” against the national security of any country.
However, the interpretations and perspectives of Washington – at least in terms of what was officially conveyed to the public – were widely at variance with these assertions. The US rejected China’s diplomatic demarche describing the huge civilian airship as a “Spy Balloon” and its intrusion into US airspace as “an affront to US sovereignty and international law”.
And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
The critical discourse here is not about the almost routine, surreptitious, practices of major powers to deploy sophisticated equipment and/or cyber technology for the purposes of eavesdropping and intelligence gathering. It is not also about the provisions of international law on the sovereignty of States in all its dimensions and manifestations.
The real discourse is on the precedence, and the spiral of chain reaction, that this saga may portend. In a nutshell, whether the encounter is an isolated and anomalous episode; or whether it, in fact, constitutes the tip of the iceberg in a destabilizing climate of rivalry and confrontation that is essentially driven by the US dogged policy of reviving the defunct uni-polar world order.
And that is the crux of the matter.
As explicitly expounded in the latest US National Security Strategic document, the US considers the current decade as the critical inflection point which will determine global dominance. The corollary of this position is the pursuit of its “’ containment policy”, especially against China, with higher and confrontational vigour.
In this context, the “Spy Balloon” saga may be a harbinger of potentially more dangerous incidents with far-reaching consequences to global peace and security. In this sense, it transcends issues of controversy between two powers to draw the attention and moral voice of our global community.
The Follies of US “Containment Policy’’
Feb 17, 2023
International news has been dominated of late by a high-pitched acrimony between Washington and Beijing. The purported trigger-point was the rather massive unmanned airship or Balloon from China that floated over US airspace at over 60,000ft. for a number of days.
The Chinese side maintained from the outset that the airship was a “civilian aircraft with limited self-steering capability that entered US airspace unintentionally due to force majeure”.
Beijing further underlined that the Balloon and its payload were exclusively “designed for meteorological data collection and research with no sinister military capability or threat” against the national security of any country.
However, the interpretations and perspectives of Washington – at least in terms of what was officially conveyed to the public – were widely at variance with these assertions. The US rejected China’s diplomatic demarche describing the huge civilian airship as a “Spy Balloon” and its intrusion into US airspace as “an affront to US sovereignty and international law”.
And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
The critical discourse here is not about the almost routine, surreptitious, practices of major powers to deploy sophisticated equipment and/or cyber technology for the purposes of eavesdropping and intelligence gathering. It is not also about the provisions of international law on the sovereignty of States in all its dimensions and manifestations.
The real discourse is on the precedence, and the spiral of chain reaction, that this saga may portend. In a nutshell, whether the encounter is an isolated and anomalous episode; or whether it, in fact, constitutes the tip of the iceberg in a destabilizing climate of rivalry and confrontation that is essentially driven by the US dogged policy of reviving the defunct uni-polar world order.
And that is the crux of the matter.
As explicitly expounded in the latest US National Security Strategic document, the US considers the current decade as the critical inflection point which will determine global dominance. The corollary of this position is the pursuit of its “’ containment policy”, especially against China, with higher and confrontational vigour.
In this context, the “Spy Balloon” saga may be a harbinger of potentially more dangerous incidents with far-reaching consequences to global peace and security. In this sense, it transcends issues of controversy between two powers to draw the attention and moral voice of our global community.
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
Temt wrote: ↑17 Feb 2023, 11:45Editorial:
The Follies of US “Containment Policy’’
Feb 17, 2023
International news has been dominated of late by a high-pitched acrimony between Washington and Beijing. The purported trigger-point was the rather massive unmanned airship or Balloon from China that floated over US airspace at over 60,000ft. for a number of days.
The Chinese side maintained from the outset that the airship was a “civilian aircraft with limited self-steering capability that entered US airspace unintentionally due to force majeure”.
Beijing further underlined that the Balloon and its payload were exclusively “designed for meteorological data collection and research with no sinister military capability or threat” against the national security of any country.
However, the interpretations and perspectives of Washington – at least in terms of what was officially conveyed to the public – were widely at variance with these assertions. The US rejected China’s diplomatic demarche describing the huge civilian airship as a “Spy Balloon” and its intrusion into US airspace as “an affront to US sovereignty and international law”.
And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
The critical discourse here is not about the almost routine, surreptitious, practices of major powers to deploy sophisticated equipment and/or cyber technology for the purposes of eavesdropping and intelligence gathering. It is not also about the provisions of international law on the sovereignty of States in all its dimensions and manifestations.
The real discourse is on the precedence, and the spiral of chain reaction, that this saga may portend. In a nutshell, whether the encounter is an isolated and anomalous episode; or whether it, in fact, constitutes the tip of the iceberg in a destabilizing climate of rivalry and confrontation that is essentially driven by the US dogged policy of reviving the defunct uni-polar world order.
And that is the crux of the matter.
As explicitly expounded in the latest US National Security Strategic document, the US considers the current decade as the critical inflection point which will determine global dominance. The corollary of this position is the pursuit of its “’ containment policy”, especially against China, with higher and confrontational vigour.
In this context, the “Spy Balloon” saga may be a harbinger of potentially more dangerous incidents with far-reaching consequences to global peace and security. In this sense, it transcends issues of controversy between two powers to draw the attention and moral voice of our global community.
Good read but why do you need F-22 to blowup a balloon? I think the US is going down. F-22?And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
Not only the United Sanctions of Amerikkka is "going down", as you correctly stated, but the EU, as well, is going down the hill with their Russophobic paranoia.ZEMEN wrote: ↑17 Feb 2023, 12:55Temt wrote: ↑17 Feb 2023, 11:45Editorial:
The Follies of US “Containment Policy’’
Feb 17, 2023
International news has been dominated of late by a high-pitched acrimony between Washington and Beijing. The purported trigger-point was the rather massive unmanned airship or Balloon from China that floated over US airspace at over 60,000ft. for a number of days.
The Chinese side maintained from the outset that the airship was a “civilian aircraft with limited self-steering capability that entered US airspace unintentionally due to force majeure”.
Beijing further underlined that the Balloon and its payload were exclusively “designed for meteorological data collection and research with no sinister military capability or threat” against the national security of any country.
However, the interpretations and perspectives of Washington – at least in terms of what was officially conveyed to the public – were widely at variance with these assertions. The US rejected China’s diplomatic demarche describing the huge civilian airship as a “Spy Balloon” and its intrusion into US airspace as “an affront to US sovereignty and international law”.
And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
The critical discourse here is not about the almost routine, surreptitious, practices of major powers to deploy sophisticated equipment and/or cyber technology for the purposes of eavesdropping and intelligence gathering. It is not also about the provisions of international law on the sovereignty of States in all its dimensions and manifestations.
The real discourse is on the precedence, and the spiral of chain reaction, that this saga may portend. In a nutshell, whether the encounter is an isolated and anomalous episode; or whether it, in fact, constitutes the tip of the iceberg in a destabilizing climate of rivalry and confrontation that is essentially driven by the US dogged policy of reviving the defunct uni-polar world order.
And that is the crux of the matter.
As explicitly expounded in the latest US National Security Strategic document, the US considers the current decade as the critical inflection point which will determine global dominance. The corollary of this position is the pursuit of its “’ containment policy”, especially against China, with higher and confrontational vigour.
In this context, the “Spy Balloon” saga may be a harbinger of potentially more dangerous incidents with far-reaching consequences to global peace and security. In this sense, it transcends issues of controversy between two powers to draw the attention and moral voice of our global community.Good read but why do you need F-22 to blowup a balloon? I think the US is going down. F-22?And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
Last edited by Temt on 17 Feb 2023, 13:54, edited 1 time in total.
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
When merit is a criterion.......
Dr Essam Yassin Mohammed has been appointed as director general of WorldFish and CGIAR’s senior director of aquatic foods, after a comprehensive global search.
Dr Mohammed will assume the post immediately, having taken on the interim role since 4 January 2022. Prior to stepping up to the helm at WorldFish, he was the global lead for climate resilience and environmental sustainability. Hailing from Eritrea, Dr Mohammed will be WorldFish’s first director general of African descent.
https://thefishsite.com/articles/dr-ess ... Un6aLcM0Dr
Dr Essam Yassin Mohammed has been appointed as director general of WorldFish and CGIAR’s senior director of aquatic foods, after a comprehensive global search.
Dr Mohammed will assume the post immediately, having taken on the interim role since 4 January 2022. Prior to stepping up to the helm at WorldFish, he was the global lead for climate resilience and environmental sustainability. Hailing from Eritrea, Dr Mohammed will be WorldFish’s first director general of African descent.
https://thefishsite.com/articles/dr-ess ... Un6aLcM0Dr
Re: አንቋዕ ደሓን መጻኹም።
ኣቤት ኣሁን ይህ ርእሰ ኣንቀጽ የተጻፈው፡ ዓለማችን ሚዛኗን ስታ እንዳትወድቅ ነውን?
ጐበዝ የእንግሊዞች ጀልባ ከነ ተሳፋሪዎቿና ማሳሪያቸው የኤርትራን ድንበር ጥሰው ሲገቡ ወንጀል፡ የቻይና ፊኛ ከነዬተራቀቁ የስለላ መሳርያቸው ያሜሪካን ደንበር ጥሰው ሲገቡ ግን "ወንጀል ኣይደለም" ብሎ ለማስተባበል መሞከር ምን ይሉታል። "ዳብል ስታንዳርድ ወይም ድርብ ዕያር" ማለት ይሄ ኣይደለምን? የእርጐ ዝምብነት ኣይደለምን? አሁን ለኤርትራና ለህዝቧ ዬሚበጃት በያማገባት ገብታ፡ በሰው ሃገር ልዑላዊነትና ልዑላዊ ውሳኔ ገብታ መፈትፈት ነው ወይስ፡ ስለ "ፊዚካል ዲማርኬሽን" ትግባሬ መጣር። ጐበዝ ኣካፍማ ኣካፋ መባል ኣለበት ዶማም ዶማ፡ ቢለናል እኛ ኤርትራውያን የመሃልና የመስመር ዳኞች በኤርትራዊ ጭዋነት ኩራትና ትህትና ጭምር።
https://tesfanews.net/britons-held-in-e ... ll-report/
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/20 ... of-africa/


https://tesfanews.net/britons-held-in-e ... ll-report/
https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/20 ... of-africa/


Temt wrote: ↑17 Feb 2023, 11:45Editorial:
The Follies of US “Containment Policy’’
Feb 17, 2023
International news has been dominated of late by a high-pitched acrimony between Washington and Beijing. The purported trigger-point was the rather massive unmanned airship or Balloon from China that floated over US airspace at over 60,000ft. for a number of days.
The Chinese side maintained from the outset that the airship was a “civilian aircraft with limited self-steering capability that entered US airspace unintentionally due to force majeure”.
Beijing further underlined that the Balloon and its payload were exclusively “designed for meteorological data collection and research with no sinister military capability or threat” against the national security of any country.
However, the interpretations and perspectives of Washington – at least in terms of what was officially conveyed to the public – were widely at variance with these assertions. The US rejected China’s diplomatic demarche describing the huge civilian airship as a “Spy Balloon” and its intrusion into US airspace as “an affront to US sovereignty and international law”.
And amid this row, the US upped the ante by shooting down the Balloon as it drifted to, and hovered over, the US Atlantic coast by an F-22 fighter equipped with AIM-six Sidewinder, Missiles. (Its debris fell six nautical miles off the US coast).
The critical discourse here is not about the almost routine, surreptitious, practices of major powers to deploy sophisticated equipment and/or cyber technology for the purposes of eavesdropping and intelligence gathering. It is not also about the provisions of international law on the sovereignty of States in all its dimensions and manifestations.
The real discourse is on the precedence, and the spiral of chain reaction, that this saga may portend. In a nutshell, whether the encounter is an isolated and anomalous episode; or whether it, in fact, constitutes the tip of the iceberg in a destabilizing climate of rivalry and confrontation that is essentially driven by the US dogged policy of reviving the defunct uni-polar world order.
And that is the crux of the matter.
As explicitly expounded in the latest US National Security Strategic document, the US considers the current decade as the critical inflection point which will determine global dominance. The corollary of this position is the pursuit of its “’ containment policy”, especially against China, with higher and confrontational vigour.
In this context, the “Spy Balloon” saga may be a harbinger of potentially more dangerous incidents with far-reaching consequences to global peace and security. In this sense, it transcends issues of controversy between two powers to draw the attention and moral voice of our global community.