In reaction to your assertions under a different thread, I have written that the suggestion that ቃልቻ colonized ቃሉ is a colossal fallacy.
Can you please say true or false or address the suggestion anyway you prefer and show that you are not phony?
Re: Eden, can you answer this simple question and show that you are not phony?
Eden,
It is not my desire to nag you about this simple question. I have no idea who you are as a person. I have respected your logical reasoning on this forum.
However, I read your statements here as something you have convinced your mind to be true. To be convinced by a fallacy is likely to lead one to have a conviction based on fallacy, which can lead to a wrong path. So, it is the fallacy that I wish to hammer out of you if I can or that you convince me that it is not a fallacy. So, which one is it? That you asserting that ቃልቻ colonized ቃሉ and the assimilation of the two is incomplete or that ቃልቻ colonized ቃሉ is a colossal fallacy? Moreover, do you read any assimilation when you read the following words: አባ፣ አቦተ፤ አብ፣ አቦታት፤ አባት፣ አባቶች?
While at it, have you read the late Professor Donald N. Levine's book in which he wrote about a protracted identity struggle for nearly two millennia? If it happened that people who lived when it started compiled a different Good Book based on the words of the ቃልቻ and ቃሉ who lived then, would it have been any less of a Good Book on its own accord?
It is not my desire to nag you about this simple question. I have no idea who you are as a person. I have respected your logical reasoning on this forum.
However, I read your statements here as something you have convinced your mind to be true. To be convinced by a fallacy is likely to lead one to have a conviction based on fallacy, which can lead to a wrong path. So, it is the fallacy that I wish to hammer out of you if I can or that you convince me that it is not a fallacy. So, which one is it? That you asserting that ቃልቻ colonized ቃሉ and the assimilation of the two is incomplete or that ቃልቻ colonized ቃሉ is a colossal fallacy? Moreover, do you read any assimilation when you read the following words: አባ፣ አቦተ፤ አብ፣ አቦታት፤ አባት፣ አባቶች?
While at it, have you read the late Professor Donald N. Levine's book in which he wrote about a protracted identity struggle for nearly two millennia? If it happened that people who lived when it started compiled a different Good Book based on the words of the ቃልቻ and ቃሉ who lived then, would it have been any less of a Good Book on its own accord?
Re: Eden, can you answer this simple question and show that you are not phony?
Nagging you again, Eden. I recently read some forum participant claiming that AbyssinianLady belongs to you. That is none of my business since you are entitled to use any name or screen name that befits you, whether it is AbyssinianLady or Abyssinian Queen or Martian or something else. I still remember the first time I saw it and thought that it was shortsighted to choose it for a screen name. If it was shortsighted then, it must have been confounding since then. So, is it true that AbyssinianLady belongs to you? Not expecting an answer, just asking.