Pro-Amharanet Mononational Federalists vs Pro-Oromumma Multinational Federalists!
Now, it seems that the political struggle in Ethiopia (Great Oromia) is cristalizing in to freedom fighting between the incumbent (pro-Amharanet mononational federalists of EPP) and the opposition (pro-Oromummaa multinational federalists like OFC). The nostalgic pro-Amharanet unitarists like Ezema have little chance to reverse the process, that is why they opted to support the status quo maintained by EPP in order to inhibit possible forward move of democratization process. Keeping the hitherto dictatorial system of Naftagnas is the only means for domination by Amharanet to persist. That is why all the Neo-Naftagnas in EPP and Ezema are doing their best to hinder democratization. Any movement towards freedom and democracy supports possible transformation of the country towards Oromiffaa- and Oromummaa led Ethiopia, because of demographic advantage the Oromo have. Both pro-independence forces like the OLF and pro-integration Oromo elites in OFC now support Oromo multinational federalists for pragmatic reason. The mononationalists tell us that there is only one Ethiopian nationalism with content of course Amharanet. The multinationalists know very well that Ethiopia is multinational country to be led by Oromummaa.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2017 ... thiopia-2/
Re: Pro-Amharanet Mononational Federalists vs Pro-Oromumma Multinational Federalists!
What was the implication of the handshake on the Oromo liberation movement? It depends on the definition we give for the word liberation. If it is “liberation” in a sense of the status quo as EPP people try to convince us, then the handshake was good to keep it. If “liberation” means self-determination in the form of Oromia’s autonomy in Ethiopian context, like what Oromo federalists in Medrek want to realize, then the handshake was against it. If we mean “liberation” is self-determination leading to Oromia’s independence without union of nations in the empire, the handshake was almost similar to that of Hitler with Mussolini to subjugate the free world. Simply put, such handshake is anti-thesis of the alliances like Medrek, and it helpes the EPP to secure its power further based on its method of divide-and-rule. The only question to be answered was: did Ato Hailu do this intentionally being the “smart TPLF supporter” or did he do the job unintentionally being the “stu*pid anti-TPLF”, who was just naively instrumentalized by the canning fox? But now, the struggle is between pro-Amharanet dictatorial federalist EPP and pro-Oromummaa democratic federalists like the OFC. Surely, the pro-Oromummas shall prevail over the grave of pro-Amharanet dictatorial federalists, who are now camouflaged as pro-Ethiopiawinet.
Re: Pro-Amharanet Mononational Federalists vs Pro-Oromumma Multinational Federalists!
Otherwise, no question that the Derg style Ethiofascist Amhara elites and the Woyane type Ethnofascist Tegaru elites have already lost power in Finfinne palace, never to come back again. Simply put, these two authoritarian groups of Abyssinian elites belong to the past. From now on, political competitors are democratic Ethiofederalists and Ethnofederalists led by Oromo elites being influenced by egaliterian Gadaa principle. The known mindset of the Oromo (the OLF) is now leading both federalist groups. Some elites in the ruling party (EPP) of Dr. Abiy are democrat wing of the OLF, whereas the opposition groups are republican wing. The democrat wing is open for Ethiofederation (geography based federation), while for the republican wing, Ethnofederation (language based) is a compromise solution to be accepted as a prelude towards independent Oromia. The two dead groups of fascist Abyssinian elites may try to bring back their dying Ethiopian (Abyssinian) empire, whereas the two federalist camps of Oromians are pushing forward to foster democratic Ethiopian (Oromian) union.