Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
OPFist
Member+
Posts: 7402
Joined: 29 Sep 2013, 09:27

Prerequisites for De-Killilization, De-ethnization and Democratization of Oropia (Oromumma led Ethiopia)?

Post by OPFist » 07 Mar 2025, 14:38

Prerequisites for De-Killilization, De-ethnization and Democratization of Oropia (Oromumma led Ethiopia)?

It is an over due that Ethiopia in form of Amapia (Amaranet dominated country) is dying slowly, but surely, whereas Ethiopia in a sense of Oropia (Oromumma led country) is growing. Now, at this transitional phase, it is not bad to defend and maintain the existing Killil-federation. But, in a long run, Oromo forces need to keep the very integration and unity of our bigger home – Oropia. For that purpose, de-Killilization, de-ethnization and democratization of the country is mandatory. The best prerequisites to do this are consolidation of Oromo power in Finfinné palace, promotion of Afàn Oromo to primary working language of the federation and creation of common citizen identity of Ethiopiawinet in Oromo terms, i.e de facto Oropiawinet by undermining the currently emphasized ethnic identity. Then, I think it is possible to devide Amara Killil to Wolqayit, Agaw, Gondar, Gojjam, and Shoa as well as Oromia Killil to Macca, Tullama, Wallo, Arsi, Barentu and Borana. These regions as parts of Oropia can have their own parlament and government.
Read more: https://orompia.wordpress.com/2023/05/1 ... -ethiopia/

OPFist
Member+
Posts: 7402
Joined: 29 Sep 2013, 09:27

Re: Prerequisites for De-Killilization, De-ethnization and Democratization of Oropia (Oromumma led Ethiopia)?

Post by OPFist » 07 Mar 2025, 15:12

The current song of both Amara elites and Prosperitans led by Dr. Abiy Ahmed is about changing Ethiopian constitution and dismantling ethnic federation. Amara elites know very well why it is so important for them. As long as domination of Amaranet and Amarigna is continuing camouflaged as keeping Ethiopiawinet, these two steps help further consolidation of their domination and enhance the process of Amarization. The Oromo and other nations are against this maintenance of Amarization with pretext of supporting Ethiopiawinet. If it is really good to change the constitution and dismantle the federation, lets do it after replacing Amarigna with Afàn Oromo as a primary working language of all institutions in Ethiopia (the palace, parlament, government, justice, military, security… etc). Then, we will see if Amara elites and their other pro-Amaranet allies will continue to cry for Ethiopia and Ethiopiawinet. That is why Oromo republicans should concentrate in taking power in Finfinne palace and make Afàn Oromo the primary working language replacing Amarigna instead of trying to protect the constitution and save the federation.

The million dollar question yet to be answered ist wether Dr. Abiy is commited to maintain the ongoing domination of Amarigna,which is equivalent to making Ethiopia as Amapia, or he is dedicated to promote Afàn Oromo to primary language of the federation so that Ethiopia will be transformed to Oropia. In case he is the agent of the second, he will be celebrated by the Oromo as a high confident Oropianist, who is implementing the very original vision of Dr. Haile Fida. As I repeatedly put it, Oromo nationalists chose an independent Oromia as we had low confidence, opted for federal union in this transitional time as we got intermediate confidence to influence Ethiopia and now it seems that we are developing high confidence to foster Oropia. If Dr. Abiy is serious about fostering Oropia on the grave of Amapia, there is no problem in getting rid of ethnic federation to form geo-federation. Oropia with geo-federation is in the best interest of the Oromo. Is this the reason for Dr. Abiy’s speech in the Parlament, where he said “we, the Oromo, will never dismantle Ethiopia, because we need it = Itiyophiyan inifeligatalen”?

Otherwise, it is clear that most of the Abyssinians are either from Agaw origin or Oromo origin. King Theodros was from Agaw origin, who committed the worst crime first in Gondar and then in other regions. King Menilik was from Oromo origin, who also committed atrocity first on Tülama and then on other peoples. But surprisingly, the Agaw, who were victims of Theodros are now lionizing him and they are proud of his performance; whereas the Oromo are in general criminalizing and rejecting king Menelik and his performances. Why is such different appraisals and interpretations of almost a similar history by these two nations happening? May be because of the fact that Theodros killed Amaranized Agaws being supported by the non-Amaranized ones, whereas Minilik killed the non-Amaranized Oromos being supported by the Amaranized ones?

Post Reply