Time for the Oromo to Support Dr. Abiy Ahmed Against Amara Extremists Hiding Behind Ethiopiawinet and Orthodoxy!
According to Dr. Leenco Lataa’s principle, any Oromo politician supported by Amara elites ist doing bad job and vice versa. Thus, Dr. Abiy now being cursed by these elites seems to be on the right track, just because he is opposed by the Amara extremists. As long as they are against Abiy and his regime, Oromo nationalists should support the prime minister. We need to be vigilant and check the anti-Oromummà elites never to give them any chance of coming back to Finfinne palace. It is really interesting to observe them wearing black clothes just opposing the Oromo Orthodox Christians using Afaan Oromo to worship God. With this action they put themselves in black list of Oromia. The Oromo now know, who is in this black list and surely will pay them accordingly in the future.
Read more:https://orompia.wordpress.com/2023/02/0 ... orthodoxy/
Re: Time for the Oromo to Support Dr. Abiy Ahmed Against Amara Extremists Hiding Behind Ethiopiawinet and Orthodoxy!
Amara nationalists, who had strong fear, even to [deleted], under the rule of Tegaru dictators for about 27 years, are now making loud noises since the Oromo dictators came to power three years ago. Why did Oromo dictators allow these toothless but vocal Amara nationalists to be as such free in Oropia (Oromummà led Ethiopia)? It is because of the fact that the Oromo dictators know very well the advantage of such disturbing but harmless noises for the Oromo struggle. Such noises are mandatory to empower and unify Oromo nationalists in particular and the whole Oromo people in general. Oromo dictators just need to check that these toothless forces never grow any tooth to bite. Every single tooth need to be brocken as early as possible. They have to be allowed only to bark, but to never be in a position to bite. Amara dictators supporting Mengistu and Tegaru dictators led by Meles tried to do the same against their opponents from the Oromo camp. That is why the Oromo dictators under the leadership of Dr. Abiy should not be as such fool to allow both Habesha blocs to come to power with pretext of democracy (election) or any religion in general and orthodoxy in particular.
Nowaďays, some Amhara elites in particular and pro-Amharanet elites in general are fighting against Oromummà (Oromo nationalism). As far as they are concerned, only the hitherto Ethiopiawinet with content of only Amaranet (Ethiopiawinet as Amaranet) is safe and deserves to exist. Rainbow Ethiopiawinet with the legitimate leading element of Oromummà is considered as evil and it is unacceptable to them. Thus, they seem to be determined to hinder such justifiable transformation of Ethiopia from Amaranet domination to Oromummà leadership. But, fact on the ground is that if Ethiopia has to exist in the future, it can only prevail as rainbow multicultural und multilanguage federation with about 40% Oromummà, 20% Agawnet, 10% Amaranet, 6% Somalummà, 5% Tegarunet, 4% Sidamummà, etc. Such genuine multinational federal Ethiopia is the future. Pro-Amaranet elites waging war against Oromummà will cost them a lot. Oromo nationalism is now at the stage of no return and can fight back effectively. That is why it is really a deadly mistake of some Amara elites in particular and pro-Amaranet elites in general. Such fight against Oromummà surely will cost them a lot.
Some [ deleted ] Habesha elites try to tell us that ethnic politics is a new trend promoted by the OLF and TPLF. But, fact is that politics in Ethiopia has always been ethnic based. The only difference is that Amaranet used to dominate und rule being masked by Ethiopiawinet. Still there are some Amara elites and Amaranized others trying to play the same game. On the other hand, Oromummà is growing without using the mask and trade mark called Ethiopiawinet. No Oromo elite tries to instrumentalize this mask. I thought Dr. Abiy is smart enough to promote Oromummà in a trade package of Ethiopiawinet. Unforunately, he is still revering Amaranet, instead of respecting Oromummà. Thus, he kept the existing dominance of Amarigna/Amaranet at the cost of Oromiffà/Oromummà. He is considering Oromiffà to play only secondary role, instead of promoting it to primary position as language of the majotity in the country. He is simply pro-Amaranet elite just like the previously ruling Oromo elites.
The currently existing political spectrum in Ethiopia is not classically economic (left socialist vs right capitalist) or not surely based on type of administration (centeralist vs federalist). It is simply the result of competition between two major elements of the rainbow multinational identities: Amharanet vs Oromummà. Accordingly, there are five positions in the spektrum:
- the far left Amaranet dominated geo-federation of Ezema and the likes.
- the near left Amaranet dominated ethnic federation of Biltsigina.
- the middle position propagated by independent republic of nations as planed by the OLF and other liberation fronts.
- the near right Oromummà led ethnic federation of OFC and other democratic ethno-federalists
- the far right Oromummà led geo-federation of Meison as envisioned by Haile Fida and now promoted by Fayyis Oromia.
Which of the five positions shall prevail? Time will show aus! As written repeatedly, the possible two outcomes of the Abyssinian empire were either its democratization leading to Ethiopia – de facto integrative Oropia or its disintegration resulting to birth of an independent republic of Oromia. Interestingly the two Oromo brothers (Càlà Latà & Léncô Latà) were following one of the two respectively (Càlà to realize Gadà Oromia using OLF as instrument and Léncô to foster Oropia through the ODP). Both goals are not bad as long as the Oromo agree to accept one of the two per public verdict in the future. That is why it was futile for the Oromo to quarrel on this pseudo-conflict: democratization of Oropia vs liberation of Oromia. Look at the flags, musics and maps of the two versions of Oromia here:
Oropia) :
the flag and music –
the map – http://www.vidiani.com/maps/maps_of_afr ... hiopia.jpg
Oromia:
the flag and music –
the map – http://nikolasschiller.com/images/oromiya.jpg
It is a known fact that the Oromo are the only people with dual history in the state formation of our country and because of that having dual visions for its transformation. The Oromo were both in conquered and conqueror sides of the war in nation building. Now, among the Oromo community, some identify themselves with the conquered side and fight for liberation of Oromia; the others see themselves as parts of the conqueror and struggle for the transformation of Ethiopia to democratic country; which means de facto Oropia. The first group are pro-Oromia, while the second are pro-Ethiopia. The two blocs had a sort of conflict and sometimes they even saw each other as enemies with irreconcilable conflict. I always thought that we can have a synthetic common vision as compromise solution for the conflict; i.e use of two names (Ethiopia and Oropia) interchangeably for the same country, just as we are calling our capital Addisaba and Finfinne simultaneously.
Thus, future democratic Ethiopia is de facto Oropia, in which Oropia can have self-rule . We can choose one of the possible three sovereignty: ‘self rule of Oromia without shared rule of Ethiopia’ or ‘self rule of Oromia within shared rule of Ethiopia’ or ‘shared rule of Ethiopia without self rule of Oromia. I think, for the Oromo as a majority over all the multi-national country, the first goal setting was good to liberate us, the second option is nice at the present transitional phase and the third vision will be beneficial than the other two in the future. Fayyis Oromia is focusing on this third and optimal cause. Now, Oromianists vehmently opposing the nice approach of Oropianists is good only for the power mongering Abyssinian elites. Amarianists like those in Ezema and Biltsigina will surely lose and the future favores Oromianists like OFC and OLF. May Waaqa help us choose the best position envisioned by Haile Fida and now entertained by Fayyis Oromia!
Nowaďays, some Amhara elites in particular and pro-Amharanet elites in general are fighting against Oromummà (Oromo nationalism). As far as they are concerned, only the hitherto Ethiopiawinet with content of only Amaranet (Ethiopiawinet as Amaranet) is safe and deserves to exist. Rainbow Ethiopiawinet with the legitimate leading element of Oromummà is considered as evil and it is unacceptable to them. Thus, they seem to be determined to hinder such justifiable transformation of Ethiopia from Amaranet domination to Oromummà leadership. But, fact on the ground is that if Ethiopia has to exist in the future, it can only prevail as rainbow multicultural und multilanguage federation with about 40% Oromummà, 20% Agawnet, 10% Amaranet, 6% Somalummà, 5% Tegarunet, 4% Sidamummà, etc. Such genuine multinational federal Ethiopia is the future. Pro-Amaranet elites waging war against Oromummà will cost them a lot. Oromo nationalism is now at the stage of no return and can fight back effectively. That is why it is really a deadly mistake of some Amara elites in particular and pro-Amaranet elites in general. Such fight against Oromummà surely will cost them a lot.
Some [ deleted ] Habesha elites try to tell us that ethnic politics is a new trend promoted by the OLF and TPLF. But, fact is that politics in Ethiopia has always been ethnic based. The only difference is that Amaranet used to dominate und rule being masked by Ethiopiawinet. Still there are some Amara elites and Amaranized others trying to play the same game. On the other hand, Oromummà is growing without using the mask and trade mark called Ethiopiawinet. No Oromo elite tries to instrumentalize this mask. I thought Dr. Abiy is smart enough to promote Oromummà in a trade package of Ethiopiawinet. Unforunately, he is still revering Amaranet, instead of respecting Oromummà. Thus, he kept the existing dominance of Amarigna/Amaranet at the cost of Oromiffà/Oromummà. He is considering Oromiffà to play only secondary role, instead of promoting it to primary position as language of the majotity in the country. He is simply pro-Amaranet elite just like the previously ruling Oromo elites.
The currently existing political spectrum in Ethiopia is not classically economic (left socialist vs right capitalist) or not surely based on type of administration (centeralist vs federalist). It is simply the result of competition between two major elements of the rainbow multinational identities: Amharanet vs Oromummà. Accordingly, there are five positions in the spektrum:
- the far left Amaranet dominated geo-federation of Ezema and the likes.
- the near left Amaranet dominated ethnic federation of Biltsigina.
- the middle position propagated by independent republic of nations as planed by the OLF and other liberation fronts.
- the near right Oromummà led ethnic federation of OFC and other democratic ethno-federalists
- the far right Oromummà led geo-federation of Meison as envisioned by Haile Fida and now promoted by Fayyis Oromia.
Which of the five positions shall prevail? Time will show aus! As written repeatedly, the possible two outcomes of the Abyssinian empire were either its democratization leading to Ethiopia – de facto integrative Oropia or its disintegration resulting to birth of an independent republic of Oromia. Interestingly the two Oromo brothers (Càlà Latà & Léncô Latà) were following one of the two respectively (Càlà to realize Gadà Oromia using OLF as instrument and Léncô to foster Oropia through the ODP). Both goals are not bad as long as the Oromo agree to accept one of the two per public verdict in the future. That is why it was futile for the Oromo to quarrel on this pseudo-conflict: democratization of Oropia vs liberation of Oromia. Look at the flags, musics and maps of the two versions of Oromia here:
Oropia) :
the flag and music –
the map – http://www.vidiani.com/maps/maps_of_afr ... hiopia.jpg
Oromia:
the flag and music –
the map – http://nikolasschiller.com/images/oromiya.jpg
It is a known fact that the Oromo are the only people with dual history in the state formation of our country and because of that having dual visions for its transformation. The Oromo were both in conquered and conqueror sides of the war in nation building. Now, among the Oromo community, some identify themselves with the conquered side and fight for liberation of Oromia; the others see themselves as parts of the conqueror and struggle for the transformation of Ethiopia to democratic country; which means de facto Oropia. The first group are pro-Oromia, while the second are pro-Ethiopia. The two blocs had a sort of conflict and sometimes they even saw each other as enemies with irreconcilable conflict. I always thought that we can have a synthetic common vision as compromise solution for the conflict; i.e use of two names (Ethiopia and Oropia) interchangeably for the same country, just as we are calling our capital Addisaba and Finfinne simultaneously.
Thus, future democratic Ethiopia is de facto Oropia, in which Oropia can have self-rule . We can choose one of the possible three sovereignty: ‘self rule of Oromia without shared rule of Ethiopia’ or ‘self rule of Oromia within shared rule of Ethiopia’ or ‘shared rule of Ethiopia without self rule of Oromia. I think, for the Oromo as a majority over all the multi-national country, the first goal setting was good to liberate us, the second option is nice at the present transitional phase and the third vision will be beneficial than the other two in the future. Fayyis Oromia is focusing on this third and optimal cause. Now, Oromianists vehmently opposing the nice approach of Oropianists is good only for the power mongering Abyssinian elites. Amarianists like those in Ezema and Biltsigina will surely lose and the future favores Oromianists like OFC and OLF. May Waaqa help us choose the best position envisioned by Haile Fida and now entertained by Fayyis Oromia!