Sovereignty: Abesha’s Dictatorial Style vs Oromo’s Democratic Way!
Abesha’s style of sovereignty is dictatorial (Amara’s dictatorial centralism, Tegau’s dictatorial federalism and Eritrea’s dictatorial separatism), whereas Oromo’s way is a democratic choice between the three types of sovereignty (centralism, federalism and separatism). According to the ongoing discussion in Oromo nationalists’ circle, the three types of sovereignty, in forms of Amhara’s model (assimilative), Tegaru style (imperial) and Eritrean type (exclusive) are not as such bad for the Oromo people in the future if chosen democratically, but preferable is the Oromo's best way (Oromummà led rainbow union). Amhara’s model in Oromo term is an assimilative like having democratically free development and use of Afàn Oromo at the federal level, which will assimilate the other neighboring language groups into being Oromo, thus practically Ethiopia = Oropia (Oromummà led state). The dictatorial assimilative approach must be distinguished from the democratic accomodative and integrative option of the Oromo’s way in the suggested rainbow union. Tegaru’s style is an imperial, where the Oromo people having free Oromo state, and at the same time, ruling over other nations. Such imperial rule is also not the same to democratic autonomy for all nations and nationalities in the Oromo’s option. Eritrean type is an ‘independent Oromo state’ as separate nation-state, free from other nations; this Eritrean way in a democratic term can be a rule-out result, in case all other nations refuse to live with us and leave the Oromo way of rainbow union.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2017 ... mos-way-2/
Re: Sovereignty: Abesha’s Dictatorial Style vs Oromo’s Democratic Way!
Why do you racialize political science?