
At 3,333 kilometers, Somalia has the second longest coastline in Africa after Madagascar (1,200 km along the Gulf of Aden and 2,133 km along the Indian Ocean). The country’s declared 200 nautical mile (nm) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) covers 1,165,500 Km2 . As per the provisions of the Law of the Sea, Somalia is responsible for managing fisheries within this zone.
the vastness of Somalia’s maritime zone makes patrolling and surveillance for fisheries enforcement difficult and the EEZ is much larger than Somalia’s land area of 637,540 km2. As a result, Somalia has enormous potential to harness its marine resources to develop fisheries. If fully utilized, and with political stability, these resources could have a positive economic impact on the country.
Marine resources in Somalia have the potential to increase local seafood consumption, create products for export substitution and redouble efforts to transform the means of production for exports.
These opportunities provide new possibilities to create jobs, improve people’s nutrition and increase Somalia’s foreign exchange.The region is rich in maritime resources thanks mainly to the upwelling of deep nutrient rich waters to the surface. This explains the irony of food insecurity in a region of plenty.
Foreign vessels fishing illegally in Somali waters can be divided into two types: regional and international. Regional vessels come from (Seychelles, Tanzania, Kenya owned and operated by European companies), Kuwait, Egypt, Iran, Bahrain, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Oman, United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Yemen (Schelbey and Rosenau, 2013). They usually operate within Somalia’s 12 nm territorial seas and are often visible from Somali coastal villages. They may interact with Somali fishermen, and some apparently buy fish from artisanal fishermen, who transship their catch at sea.
These vessels fish so close to the shore that they compete with local artisanal fishermen for resources and destroy nets of local fishermen. They often engage in bottom trawling thereby destroying vital habitats and depleting fish stocks.
International vessels come from China, Philippines, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, Thailand, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India, France, Spain, Sweden, Netherlands, The United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Portugal, Iceland, Greece, Poland, Estonia, Italy, Belize, Panama, Honduras and Russia. Most fish within Somalia’s 200-nm EEZ waters (Schelbey and Rosenau, 2013).
These vessels have limited interaction with coastal communities, but some acquire counterfeit Somali fishing license. The list of illegal fishing vessel flag states violating Somali waters is almost double those listed by the fishermen interviewed in this study. It is difficult for Somali fishermen to identify the origin as an illegal fishing vessel. These vessels use all means to disguise their identity because they are violating international agreements.
It is difficult to estimate what annual loss these IUU vessels from neighboring and distant nations cause to Somalia. Estimates range from US$ 500 million to over US$900 million, In addition to revenue loss, illegal fishing vessels cause overfishing, reduce fish stocks, affect local catches, harm marine environment and destroy communities as they lose opportunities to catch, process and trade fish. As the market value a particular fish increases, so do the chances of IUU fishing for that fish because profit from selling it increases. Most fish that are IUU fished have diminished stocks.
IUU fishing is associated with large amounts of by catch through the targeting of highly priced species and the flouting of regulations on equipment.
The most tangible economic impact of IUU fishing on Somalia is the direct loss of value of fish catches that could benefit the fishing communities and the nation. In addition to loss of national income, illegal fishing causes losses of employment in fishing and post-harvest fish handling, landing fees, license fees, taxes and other revenues payable by legal fishing companies. Indirect harm of IUU fishing to Somalia also includes loss of income and employment in other sectors and activities in the supply chain upstream (fishing gear, boats and equipment, etc.) and downstream (fish processing and packaging, marketing and transport, etc.) from the fishing operation itself (MRAG, 2005).
As IUU fishing vessels are constantly fearful of being spotted, they exploit resources irresponsibly. They have damaging impacts on target species, marine ecosystem and vulnerable species such as coral reefs, dugongs and turtles, whose catches are mitigated by regulations on legitimate fishing practices. This negatively affects ocean productivity, biodiversity and ecosystem's resilience, leading to a reduction in food security for artisanal fishermen and to future catches.
Lost Value to IUU Fishing
The Marine Resources Assessment Group (MRAG) carried out a study in 2005 for UK’s Department of International Development to estimate the annual value of illegal fishing in Somalia, The MRAG study showed that in one year (2003-2004) Somalia lost close to $ 500 million to IUU fishing (Figure 5).
Sources, oceana.org























