They all want is everyone to clap for them so that they could do the deception they carried out on Agee dynasty!
Even if these extremists gain some momentum, per their history they are deceptive and negation would likely fail. The only hope for the region is working with the moderates in the region!
==================
It is highly unlikely that Fano could restore the old Amhara hegemony. Ethiopia’s other major ethnic groups—such as the Oromo and Tigrayans—view such dominance as a past system of oppression. Attempting to reverse ethnic federalism to restore central Amhara control would face fierce, existential resistance nationwide.
While Fano operates as a loosely unified Amhara nationalist force fighting against the federal government, their core domestic support is deeply localized to the Amhara region. Their reception across Ethiopia remains highly polarized due to competing political visions.
1. The Amhara Perspective: Fano as Protectors
* Widespread Popular Support: Within the Amhara region, Fano is largely viewed as a necessary defense force. They are seen as protectors against perceived existential threats, land encroachments (such as disputes over Western Tigray), and targeted violence against Amhara communities in other regions.
* Ideology: Fano's official political wings, like the Amhara Fano National Movement (AFNM), frame their struggle as a fight to end ethnic federalism and secure democratic rights for all Ethiopians, rather than seeking a return to historical ethnic dominance. NO BODY TRUSTS THAT FROM THEHISTORY OF ONE ETHNIC DOMINATEDRULES IN THE PAST!!
You can’t trust “ethnic pure blood” force to free you. Like expecting KKK to free blacks
2. The Rest of Ethiopia: Fano as a Threat
* Rejection of Hegemony: To the majority of non-Amhara Ethiopians, including the ruling Prosperity Party led by Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, Fano's objectives are viewed with deep suspicion. Many groups view Amhara nationalism as an attempt to return to a centralized, imperial-style state that erases the cultural and political autonomy they gained after 1991.
* Political Deadlock: Groups like the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) or Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) are deeply opposed to Fano's territorial claims and unitary aspirations. Any attempt by Fano to march on Addis Ababa to seize national power would likely trigger a prolonged, multi-front civil war.
3. Fano's Current Reality
Fano controls large swaths of the rural Amhara countryside, but has been unable to defeat the Ethiopian National Defense Force (ENDF) to capture major cities. Recognizing the devastating human and economic toll of the ongoing insurgency, some Fano factions (such as the Amhara Fano Popular Organization - AFPO) have pursued breakthrough peace and reintegration agreements with the regional government.
Ultimately, rather than restoring old hegemony, Fano's long-term political role will likely involve negotiating for regional autonomy, constitutional reform, and security guarantees for the Amhara people within a decentralized Ethiopia.