Mereja.Forum

Corridors Do Not Build Economies
Zelalem Tamir

February 27, 2026

Urban corridors have already cost billions, and it is time to stop.

At dusk, Addis Ababa’s new corridors glow. Fresh asphalt reflects streetlights; landscaped riverbanks shimmer; cranes silhouette the skyline. It is the kind of imagery that signals motion, ambition, modernity. But development is not a photograph. It is a balance sheet – one that records not only what is built, but what is forgone.

Ethiopia today confronts a classic problem of political economy: how to allocate scarce capital in a country facing fiscal constraints, climate vulnerability, youth unemployment, and persistent poverty. Billions of birr has been directed toward urban corridor projects and resort developments. These investments promise tourism revenues, land-lease income, and visible transformation. They are, undeniably, politically powerful.

But economic policy must be judged not by visibility, but by productivity.


In a predominantly agrarian country, where agriculture still accounts for roughly one-third of GDP and employs the majority of citizens, irrigation remains one of the most feasible and economically rational investment options. Irrigated land yields more than double the output of rain-fed agriculture. It stabilizes production in the face of erratic rainfall. It reduces dependence on food imports, strengthens foreign-exchange reserves, and mitigates the need for emergency relief when drought strikes.

The returns are not merely agricultural. Higher rural incomes stimulate demand for manufactured goods, encourage agro-processing, and reduce distress migration to cities. Growth originating in agriculture has historically reduced poverty more effectively than growth in other sectors. In development economics, raising productivity at the base of the income distribution generates multiplier effects that urban consumption-driven projects rarely match.

Yet irrigation is only one pillar of a more coherent alternative strategy.

Ethiopia’s renewable energy potential – solar, wind, and geothermal – remains underexploited. Diversifying beyond hydropower would reduce vulnerability to drought while supporting industrial expansion. Rural electrification through decentralized mini-grids could transform education, healthcare, and small enterprise. Energy investment is not simply about megawatts; it is about enabling productivity across sectors.


Continue reading https://birrmetrics.com/corridors-do-no ... economies/

This Zelalem Tamir must be a certain Shaandoo or Faandoo, desperate for attention!

Just before a week or so the PM and his top government officials toured the 4 regions of the troubled Wollega and the Pumpkin Jaanjoo was quick to seek attention claiming the PM was in Wollega to fabricate a semblance non-existent public support, the guy has become a laughing stock of the world.

The PM and his team were there to inaugurate multiple projects, among which there were also a completed irrigation project and another one near completion, when completed with a potential of cultivating over 100K hectares of land.

Can you imagine what that means?

And this inept attention seeker is trying to lecture the government about the value of irrigation, a certain dumb creature!

Tell the inept Addis Corridor is already generating Billions of Dollars annually from only the tourism sector alone! This will be reinvested into further projects geared towards economic development, leading to "multiplier effects", in the true sense of the term.
You have lost on the propaganda front too!

sarcasm wrote: ↑

28 Feb 2026, 13:03

Corridors Do Not Build Economies
Zelalem Tamir

February 27, 2026

Urban corridors have already cost billions, and it is time to stop.

At dusk, Addis Ababa’s new corridors glow. Fresh asphalt reflects streetlights; landscaped riverbanks shimmer; cranes silhouette the skyline. It is the kind of imagery that signals motion, ambition, modernity. But development is not a photograph. It is a balance sheet – one that records not only what is built, but what is forgone.

Ethiopia today confronts a classic problem of political economy: how to allocate scarce capital in a country facing fiscal constraints, climate vulnerability, youth unemployment, and persistent poverty. Billions of birr has been directed toward urban corridor projects and resort developments. These investments promise tourism revenues, land-lease income, and visible transformation. They are, undeniably, politically powerful.

But economic policy must be judged not by visibility, but by productivity.


In a predominantly agrarian country, where agriculture still accounts for roughly one-third of GDP and employs the majority of citizens, irrigation remains one of the most feasible and economically rational investment options. Irrigated land yields more than double the output of rain-fed agriculture. It stabilizes production in the face of erratic rainfall. It reduces dependence on food imports, strengthens foreign-exchange reserves, and mitigates the need for emergency relief when drought strikes.

The returns are not merely agricultural. Higher rural incomes stimulate demand for manufactured goods, encourage agro-processing, and reduce distress migration to cities. Growth originating in agriculture has historically reduced poverty more effectively than growth in other sectors. In development economics, raising productivity at the base of the income distribution generates multiplier effects that urban consumption-driven projects rarely match.

Yet irrigation is only one pillar of a more coherent alternative strategy.

Ethiopia’s renewable energy potential – solar, wind, and geothermal – remains underexploited. Diversifying beyond hydropower would reduce vulnerability to drought while supporting industrial expansion. Rural electrification through decentralized mini-grids could transform education, healthcare, and small enterprise. Energy investment is not simply about megawatts; it is about enabling productivity across sectors.


Continue reading https://birrmetrics.com/corridors-do-no ... economies/