TN Commentaries
2h ·
Ethiopia is the only coward African country that voted YES against #Eritrea today. Traitor! Noted!(((War Has Began))):Slave-Ethiopia Voted Against My Eritrea @ Un.!!! WEEY GUUD !!!
TN Commentaries
2h ·
Ethiopia is the only coward African country that voted YES against #Eritrea today. Traitor! Noted!Re: (((War Has Began))):Slave-Ethiopia Voted Against My Eritrea @ Un.!!! WEEY GUUD !!!
Ghideon Musa Aron
3h ·
Statement delivered by Mr. Habtom Zerai, Chargé d’affaires at the Permanent Mission of Eritrea to the United Nations during the Presentation of Resolution A/HRC/59/L.7. Situation of Human Rights in Eritrea
Mr. President,
Eritrea categorically rejects resolution L.7 in its entirety—its fallacious premises, its malicious language, and the blatantly politicized agenda it embodies.
We find ourselves, yet again, confronted with the recycling of a discredited narrative, peddled by the same group that has shamelessly weaponized human rights as tools of coercion and geopolitical manipulation for over a decade. This resolution, thinly veiled in the language of concern, has never been about genuine human rights advancement in Eritrea. It is, unequivocally, a punitive instrument—aimed at undermining a sovereign nation that dares to resist their diktats and refuses to compromise its fundamental principles.
The text is replete with misrepresentations, double standards, and deliberate omissions. The resolution feigns “regret” over Eritrea’s alleged lack of cooperation. Yet, in a stunning display of incompetence, the same penholders systematically obstructed Eritrea’s constructive initiative, which sought cooperation under Item 10 with the Council and the Office of the High Commissioner. This duplicity, driven by a neo-colonial savior complex, sets a dangerous precedence. It is precisely this kind of hypocrisy and sabotage that threatens the credibility and cohesion of this Council.
The continued extension of the Special Rapporteur’s mandate is an affront to reason and justice. This mechanism has long since abandoned any pretense of impartiality or legitimacy. Its entrenched bias, adversarial conduct, and politicized theatrics—from one-sided reports to orchestrated side events that whitewash designated terrorist groups under the guise of combating “transnational repression”—expose it as nothing more than a grotesque instrument of disinformation and propaganda.
These farcical performances, co-orchestrated with a cabal of regime change operatives, amount to a coordinated smear campaign. They seek to manufacture consent for a mandate that is utterly devoid of legitimacy and bereft of the cooperation or consent of the state concerned. Make no mistake: this is about control, demonization, and perpetuating a colonial narrative where sovereign resistance must be crushed and independence punished.
Let us be crystal clear: Eritrea categorically rejects and will never engage with mechanisms that operate outside the framework of impartiality, mutual respect, and sovereign equality. Not in the past thirteen years, not today, and not ever!
Thank you.
3h ·
Statement delivered by Mr. Habtom Zerai, Chargé d’affaires at the Permanent Mission of Eritrea to the United Nations during the Presentation of Resolution A/HRC/59/L.7. Situation of Human Rights in Eritrea
Mr. President,
Eritrea categorically rejects resolution L.7 in its entirety—its fallacious premises, its malicious language, and the blatantly politicized agenda it embodies.
We find ourselves, yet again, confronted with the recycling of a discredited narrative, peddled by the same group that has shamelessly weaponized human rights as tools of coercion and geopolitical manipulation for over a decade. This resolution, thinly veiled in the language of concern, has never been about genuine human rights advancement in Eritrea. It is, unequivocally, a punitive instrument—aimed at undermining a sovereign nation that dares to resist their diktats and refuses to compromise its fundamental principles.
The text is replete with misrepresentations, double standards, and deliberate omissions. The resolution feigns “regret” over Eritrea’s alleged lack of cooperation. Yet, in a stunning display of incompetence, the same penholders systematically obstructed Eritrea’s constructive initiative, which sought cooperation under Item 10 with the Council and the Office of the High Commissioner. This duplicity, driven by a neo-colonial savior complex, sets a dangerous precedence. It is precisely this kind of hypocrisy and sabotage that threatens the credibility and cohesion of this Council.
The continued extension of the Special Rapporteur’s mandate is an affront to reason and justice. This mechanism has long since abandoned any pretense of impartiality or legitimacy. Its entrenched bias, adversarial conduct, and politicized theatrics—from one-sided reports to orchestrated side events that whitewash designated terrorist groups under the guise of combating “transnational repression”—expose it as nothing more than a grotesque instrument of disinformation and propaganda.
These farcical performances, co-orchestrated with a cabal of regime change operatives, amount to a coordinated smear campaign. They seek to manufacture consent for a mandate that is utterly devoid of legitimacy and bereft of the cooperation or consent of the state concerned. Make no mistake: this is about control, demonization, and perpetuating a colonial narrative where sovereign resistance must be crushed and independence punished.
Let us be crystal clear: Eritrea categorically rejects and will never engage with mechanisms that operate outside the framework of impartiality, mutual respect, and sovereign equality. Not in the past thirteen years, not today, and not ever!
Thank you.
Re: (((War Has Began))):Slave-Ethiopia Voted Against My Eritrea @ Un.!!! WEEY GUUD !!!
Ghideon Musa Aron
1h ·
This outcome offers a clear and compelling indication that the resolution lacks a strong, credible, or unified mandate. #Eritrea has once again been vindicated as the voting pattern reveals a politically motivated agenda rather than an objective assessment.
The fact that nearly as many Member States abstained as those who supported the resolution underscores growing discomfort with the politicization of country-specific mandates and the continued targeting of #Eritrea through selective and one-sided narratives. The 13-year-long harassment of Eritrea is a vivid example of how the @UN_HRC is being used to advance ulterior political agendas.
Credible reports reveal behind-the-scenes pressure and coercive diplomacy applied to #Africa|n ahead of the vote by the #Europe|an Union delegation @EU_UNGeneva, and others. Such conduct is deeply troubling, as it undermines the principles of sovereign equality, voluntary decision-making, and genuine multilateralism that should underpin the Council’s work. This continued instrumentalization of human rights to serve narrow political interests must end.
The ongoing existence of the Special Rapporteur’s politically motivated mandate on #Eritrea at the UN Human Rights Council is not driven by objective human rights concerns, but rather reflects the geopolitical power imbalance characterizing the Council’s operations.
A small group of Western states exerts outsized influence over mandate renewals, using human rights mechanisms as instruments of foreign policy rather than tools for genuine dialogue or reform. These states have shielded politically aligned “regime change” activists, dubbed "human rights defenders", cherry-picked narratives produced by echo chambers of funded NGOs and groups, and has ignored systemic improvements and sovereign realities in #Eritrea, all to sustain a crisis narrative that justifies external interference.
This politicized mandate gravely undermines the credibility of the @UN_HRC. It has transformed the Council into a space where sovereign decision-making is penalized, and political conformity with dominant narratives is rewarded. The persistence of this mandate is less about principled human rights concerns and more about advancing the strategic interests of a handful of powerful states, many historically implicated in maintaining global asymmetries.
For over 13 years, #Eritrea has been unfairly targeted for choosing an independent and self-reliant development path, one that deliberately diverges from externally imposed models of governance and development. Rather than respecting Eritrea’s sovereign right to chart its own course, this approach has faced sustained criticism and harassment. Instead of fostering constructive dialogue and cooperation, the mandate has been exploited repeatedly to isolate, stigmatize, and delegitimize a sovereign #African state committed to self-determination and genuine development.
This issue lies at the heart of the growing global call for genuine @UN reform. Today, the Human Rights Council targets #Eritrea with a politicized mandate; tomorrow, it could be another sovereign state choosing an independent path. The question is no longer about #Eritrea alone, it is about the #credibility, #impartiality, and future of the Council itself.
This misuse of human rights mechanisms erodes the Council’s legitimacy. It exposes a double standard: some nations are shielded from scrutiny regardless of their records, while others face politicized mandates shaped by geopolitical calculations. To retain the trust of all Member States, especially those from the Global South, the Council must uphold impartiality, reject selective targeting, and embrace a genuinely cooperative approach to human rights.
There is an urgent need for comprehensive reform of the @UN_HRC, reforms that uphold sovereign equality, reject politicization, and ensure human rights mechanisms serve all Member States fairly and constructively. The way forward requires true solidarity among States, especially those in the Global South, to safeguard the integrity and legitimacy of multilateralism, lest the Council devolve into a tool of selective punishment rather than universal protection.
If multilateral institutions can be weaponized against one nation for asserting its sovereignty, then no nation is truly immune. This selective approach does not strengthen human rights; it weakens the legitimacy of the system and alienates Member States, particularly from the Global South, who increasingly see these mechanisms as tools of control rather than cooperation.
Member States must ask themselves: Do we want a @UN_HRC that serves all nations equitably, or one that punishes political independence and self-determination, rights enshrined in the UN Charter? The answer will define the future of international cooperation.
Today it is #Eritrea; tomorrow, it could be you.
Ambassador Sophia Tesfamariam See less
=================================================================================================================================
Nakfa Press
17m ·
ውዑይ-ዜና
ኦሎምፒካዊ ተቐዳዳማይ ቢንያም ግርማይ ኣብ ቀዳማይ መድረኽ 2ይ ተርታ ሒዙ---ብሉጽ ቮላታ ----ብሉጽ ብቕዓት
ናይ ዓሚ 3 ጊዜ መድረኽ ዙር ፈረንሳን ቀጠልያ ማልያን ዝተዓወተ ኤርትራዊ ተፕሮፈሽናል ተቀዳዳማይ ብሽክለታ ብንያም ግርማይ ኣብ ቀዳማይ መድረኽ ዙር ፈረንሳ 2ይ ብምውጻእ ታሪክ ሰሪሑ።
