I AM HORUS. I AM HAPPY TO SEE USAID SHUTTING DOWN!
Posted: 03 Feb 2025, 00:53
ልመና የለመዱና በልመና የሚኖሩ በተለይ በአገራችን ሰርቶ የመብላት ሳይሆን በልመና ክላቸር የሰለጠኑ ሕዝቦች ሁሉ አሁን ሰርቶ መብላትን እንዲማሩ ትልቅ የቢሄቬርና የካልቸር ለውጥ እንዲያደርጉ ያደርጋቸዋል ።
The end of USAID is a blessing in disguise!
But it is unlikely that Americans really want to end it because USIAD is a major tool of US global policy and American farmer's subsidy mechanism.
Here is what deepseek says about it.
"USAID (United States Agency for International Development) is indeed a significant instrument of American foreign policy, though its role encompasses both humanitarian objectives and strategic interests. Here's a breakdown of its dual nature:
Foreign Policy Alignment:
USAID operates under the guidance of the U.S. State Department and aligns with broader diplomatic goals. Its assistance programs often reflect the priorities of the current administration, such as promoting democracy, countering authoritarian influence, or stabilizing conflict-affected regions.
Example: During the Cold War, USAID focused on curbing Soviet expansion by supporting development in strategically important countries. Today, initiatives may aim to counter China's global infrastructure investments or address root causes of extremism.
Soft Power and Diplomacy:
By providing aid for health, education, and economic development, USAID fosters goodwill and strengthens partnerships abroad, enhancing U.S. "soft power." This aligns with Joseph Nye’s concept of using attraction and persuasion rather than coercion in foreign policy.
Humanitarian and Developmental Goals:
USAID’s core mission includes apolitical efforts like disaster relief, poverty reduction, and global health (e.g., PEPFAR for HIV/AIDS). These programs save lives and promote stability, which indirectly supports U.S. interests by reducing crises that could demand intervention.
Conditionality and Strategic Allocation:
Aid distribution often reflects geopolitical considerations. Allies or nations critical to U.S. interests may receive prioritized support, sometimes tied to governance reforms or policy changes (e.g., anti-corruption measures).
Institutional Independence:
While USAID coordinates with the State Department, it maintains operational independence, working with NGOs and multilateral organizations to implement projects. This allows it to address needs effectively while advancing U.S. values like human rights and rule of law.
Conclusion: USAID is a multifaceted tool that blends altruism with strategy. It advances U.S. foreign policy by fostering development and stability, but its work also delivers tangible humanitarian benefits, creating a synergy between American interests and global welfare."
The end of USAID is a blessing in disguise!
But it is unlikely that Americans really want to end it because USIAD is a major tool of US global policy and American farmer's subsidy mechanism.
Here is what deepseek says about it.
"USAID (United States Agency for International Development) is indeed a significant instrument of American foreign policy, though its role encompasses both humanitarian objectives and strategic interests. Here's a breakdown of its dual nature:
Foreign Policy Alignment:
USAID operates under the guidance of the U.S. State Department and aligns with broader diplomatic goals. Its assistance programs often reflect the priorities of the current administration, such as promoting democracy, countering authoritarian influence, or stabilizing conflict-affected regions.
Example: During the Cold War, USAID focused on curbing Soviet expansion by supporting development in strategically important countries. Today, initiatives may aim to counter China's global infrastructure investments or address root causes of extremism.
Soft Power and Diplomacy:
By providing aid for health, education, and economic development, USAID fosters goodwill and strengthens partnerships abroad, enhancing U.S. "soft power." This aligns with Joseph Nye’s concept of using attraction and persuasion rather than coercion in foreign policy.
Humanitarian and Developmental Goals:
USAID’s core mission includes apolitical efforts like disaster relief, poverty reduction, and global health (e.g., PEPFAR for HIV/AIDS). These programs save lives and promote stability, which indirectly supports U.S. interests by reducing crises that could demand intervention.
Conditionality and Strategic Allocation:
Aid distribution often reflects geopolitical considerations. Allies or nations critical to U.S. interests may receive prioritized support, sometimes tied to governance reforms or policy changes (e.g., anti-corruption measures).
Institutional Independence:
While USAID coordinates with the State Department, it maintains operational independence, working with NGOs and multilateral organizations to implement projects. This allows it to address needs effectively while advancing U.S. values like human rights and rule of law.
Conclusion: USAID is a multifaceted tool that blends altruism with strategy. It advances U.S. foreign policy by fostering development and stability, but its work also delivers tangible humanitarian benefits, creating a synergy between American interests and global welfare."