The Hitherto Inclusive Cooperations, Which Could Make a Difference in Ethiopia
Posted: 15 Jan 2025, 06:22
The Hitherto Inclusive Cooperations, Which Could Make a Difference in Ethiopia
In liberation struggle against the oppressive Abyssinian empire’s system, we had passed through different phases and we had formed different alliances. The struggle has almost always been done by two ideologically opposite political camps, i.e. by unionists, who want to liberate oppressed nations in the empire and build, where possible, union of free peoples, and by unitarists, who do disregard autonomy of nations, but want to liberate individual citizens from any sort of oppression. In other words, it has been the struggle by those emphasizing group (national) liberty and by those stressing individual (citizens’) freedom. Despite their similarity in socialist ideology, one of the major differences between Ici'at and Me’ison was their tendency towards being unionist and unitarist, respectively. Ici'at, being dominated and led by intellectuals, had been for self-determination of nations in a sense of having their own national autonomy within Oropian (Oromummà led Ethiopian) union, whereas, Meison being dominated and led by intellectuals, had been for self-determination of nations in a sense of exercising their cultures within unitary Ethiopia without national autonomy.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2019 ... -ethiopia/
In liberation struggle against the oppressive Abyssinian empire’s system, we had passed through different phases and we had formed different alliances. The struggle has almost always been done by two ideologically opposite political camps, i.e. by unionists, who want to liberate oppressed nations in the empire and build, where possible, union of free peoples, and by unitarists, who do disregard autonomy of nations, but want to liberate individual citizens from any sort of oppression. In other words, it has been the struggle by those emphasizing group (national) liberty and by those stressing individual (citizens’) freedom. Despite their similarity in socialist ideology, one of the major differences between Ici'at and Me’ison was their tendency towards being unionist and unitarist, respectively. Ici'at, being dominated and led by intellectuals, had been for self-determination of nations in a sense of having their own national autonomy within Oropian (Oromummà led Ethiopian) union, whereas, Meison being dominated and led by intellectuals, had been for self-determination of nations in a sense of exercising their cultures within unitary Ethiopia without national autonomy.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2019 ... -ethiopia/