Whose is the future?
Posted: 27 Sep 2024, 16:11
Those who have vast territories?
No, you are wrong, if you think so! The future is for those who control the world trade, trade is the determinant factor of the future great nations. If they close the artery of your trade, then they can also just keep you under their control. You can exert all efforts that you have but you can never progress much.
Isayas Afeworki also thinks he could easily control the extent to which Ethiopia can grow by just keeping the trade route of the great nation under his influence. He has shown us that much unmistakably when he not only declined the offer Ethiopia made to him in order to use Assab for our trade and grant Eritreans other national treasures in return but also took no longer than started to coordinate all the neighboring countries against Ethiopia. The man is Ethiopia's eternal enemy.
Ethiopia has no other option other than taking the fate of her future trade into her own hand, else she will be doomed.
If you go to US, it is all about how to control the future trade and its routes. If you go to Europe it is all about how to control the future trade and its route. In fact Europe and US are in constant and stiff competition just over controlling the arteries of world trade.
Ever since the so called Road and Belt Initiative of China has been launched its relationship with EU and US started to sour, sometimes even constraining the prospect of world peace.
Once it became the world's major economy India also started to contemplate and chart its own secure and reliable trade routes, which it can safely control, and its relation with China and the rest started to sour similarly like that of China and the rest of other super powers.
For Ethiopia to demand and secure a reliable and secure access to the nearest trade route of the world over the Red-Sea is the minimum it has to demand and secure, if the nation really have an ambition of making itself and sustaining it independent of others. The competition is taff, so taff competition requires taff decisions and also taff determinations.
Ethiopia has just two options: either remove the man at all cost and restore normalcy to the region, where cooperation instead of confrontation should be the norm, or condemn ourselves as Ethiopians to perpetual misery for generations to come.
They took it from us at the gun point and we deserve the right to take it back by the same means.
No, you are wrong, if you think so! The future is for those who control the world trade, trade is the determinant factor of the future great nations. If they close the artery of your trade, then they can also just keep you under their control. You can exert all efforts that you have but you can never progress much.
Isayas Afeworki also thinks he could easily control the extent to which Ethiopia can grow by just keeping the trade route of the great nation under his influence. He has shown us that much unmistakably when he not only declined the offer Ethiopia made to him in order to use Assab for our trade and grant Eritreans other national treasures in return but also took no longer than started to coordinate all the neighboring countries against Ethiopia. The man is Ethiopia's eternal enemy.
Ethiopia has no other option other than taking the fate of her future trade into her own hand, else she will be doomed.
If you go to US, it is all about how to control the future trade and its routes. If you go to Europe it is all about how to control the future trade and its route. In fact Europe and US are in constant and stiff competition just over controlling the arteries of world trade.
Ever since the so called Road and Belt Initiative of China has been launched its relationship with EU and US started to sour, sometimes even constraining the prospect of world peace.
Once it became the world's major economy India also started to contemplate and chart its own secure and reliable trade routes, which it can safely control, and its relation with China and the rest started to sour similarly like that of China and the rest of other super powers.
For Ethiopia to demand and secure a reliable and secure access to the nearest trade route of the world over the Red-Sea is the minimum it has to demand and secure, if the nation really have an ambition of making itself and sustaining it independent of others. The competition is taff, so taff competition requires taff decisions and also taff determinations.
Ethiopia has just two options: either remove the man at all cost and restore normalcy to the region, where cooperation instead of confrontation should be the norm, or condemn ourselves as Ethiopians to perpetual misery for generations to come.
They took it from us at the gun point and we deserve the right to take it back by the same means.