Mereja.Forum

The fidel Serawit (የፊደል ሰራዊት) was not about the fidel itself, rather about the language, said Professor Ephrem Isak, the founder and a respected History Professor.

So, where did the Qubee come from?

Thank you Sisay Agena for producing this historic interview. This is a library and the Professor is a living testimony of history. Woyane might have mislead him at some point in time.

Very impressive wisdom for a person of welega descent.

[/quote]

Noble Amhara wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 07:15

Very impressive wisdom for a person of welega descent.

[/quote]

Noble Asama,

what about if Wollega was to discipline the likes of Prof. Iziekel Gabissa (telling him not in my name) and appreciate the likes of this professor?

How many wollegians have ever promoted the idea of this prof. and denounced that of Iziekel Gabissa?

The difference between the two is that Prof. Ephrem tries to think about what is talking (a sign of scholarly wisdom) while Iziekel is so repulsive and doesn't even care about what he is blabbering (a sign of ignorance).

Wollega has the choice to choose between the two!


BTW., please be honest and answer the following question: I remember someone under a different nick, who once stated in here and openly said something like "people are having fun by driving the ignorant youth of Ambo to their certain death in the name of protest", to which I reacted angrily and the guy didn't use that nick since then in here for long time. I am wondering why you sometimes depict some sort of similar trait with that guy, do you know him or related to him in some way?

DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 06:13

ታሪካዊ ቃለመጠይቅ ነዉ።

ሲሳይ አጌና በህይወቱ የሙያ ጥሪዉ ይህ ነዉ የሚለዉ ምን እንደሆነ ኣላዉቅም።

ኣልፎ ኣልፎ ኣጋጥሞኝ ሳዳምጠዉ ጋዜጠኝነትን በጥልቀቱ የማራመድ ዝንባሌ ያለዉ ይመስለኛል።

አጠያየቁ እንደ ኦፕራህ ዊንፍሪ፣ ላሪ ኪንግ፣ እና ቻርሊ ሮዝ ጠንካራ ጋዜጠኛ ለመሆን አቅሙን ማጎልበት የሚችል ይመስለኛል።

ያዛልቀኛል የሚል ዝንባሌ ካለዉ ግዜ ስያገኝ የእነሱን ቃለመጠይቆች ፈልጎ በጥሞና ብያዳምጣቸዉ የሚጠቅሙት ይመስለኛል።

አድዋን ተከትሎ ኢትዮጵያን የገጠማት ግፍ እና ዉጥንቅጥን ዕዉነታ ብቻ ፈልጎ ኣበጥሮ ማስተማር እና መዘገብ ብቻ ከእነሱ የበለጠ ታሪክን በብብቱ ኣድርጎ ከእነሱ የበለጠ ታሪክን የመዘገብ ዕድል ያለዉ ይመስለኛል።

እኔ የሶሻል ሳይንስ ልሂቅ ባልሆንም ከዚህ ርዕስ ብዙ የዶክተሬት ስራዎች መዉጣት የሚችሉ ይመስለኛል።

ሲሳይም ሙያዉ ላይ ከበረታ የክብር ዶክተሬት ምን ዓይነት እንደሆነ የምያሳይ ሽልማት የምያስገኝለት ይመስለኛል።

መላልሼ ይመስለኛል የምለዉ የሌላ ሰዉ አስተሳሰብ ሳይሆን ልቦናዉ የሚነግረዉን እንድያሰላስል ነዉ። የሌላ ሰዉ አስተሳሰብ ልቦናዉ ለሚነግረዉ ተጨማሪ እንጂ ወሳኝ መሆን የለበትም።

ታዳሚዎቹን ማብዛት የሚችለዉ በጣም ቀላል የሆኑ ስህተቶችን ቀድሞ በማረም ነዉ።

የሰዉ ስም ሆነ የቦታን ስም በትክክል መጥራት ኣዳማጮችን ይጨምራል እንጂ ኣይቀንስም።

ለምሳሌ ፕሮፌሰሩ እና ጋዜጠኛዉ ነጆ ሲሉ የተለያዩ አጠራራቸዉ ለኣደማጮች ግልጽ ነዉ።

ምናልባት እንደ ዋና እና ዋና ሆኖበት ይሆናል። ናን ጠበቅ እና ላላ ኣድርጎ ማንበብ የተለያየ ትርጉም ይሰጣሉ።

ከነጆ የወጡት ፕሮፌሰር ይሁኑ ስለነጆ ታሪክ ቃለመጠይቅ ያቀረበዉ ጋዜጠኛ የትኛዉ ትክክለኛ ስሙን የጠራዉ ለማያዉቁት ጥያቄ ይሆናል።

ስኬታማ ቃለመጠይቅ እንደዚህ ዓይነት ቀላል ስህተትን ካለማድረግ ይጀምራል።

ትክክለኛ አጠራሩ ካልታወቀ ከቃለመጠይቁ በፊት ማረጋገጥ ይቻላል።

የተለያየ አጠራር ያለዉ ከሆነ ስለዛ ኣጭር ዉይይት መጨመር ይቻላል።

ሁለት የሚነጋገሩ ሰዎች የተለያየ አጠራር ሲጠቀሙ የማይነጋገሩ ነዉ ወይ ያስብላል።

እንደዚህ ዐይነት ቀላል ዉዝግብ ነዉ ኣላስፈላጊ ፖለትካ ግብግብን የሚወልደዉ። የወለደዉ።

ሌላ የታሪክ ዕዉነታን ፈልጎ የመዘገብ ሙያ ዉስጥ የግል አስተያየትን ኣለማምጣት ሙያዉን የበለጠ ስኬታማ ያደርገዋል። ዕዉነታዉን ለኣዳማጮች ኣቅርቦ ግምገማዉን ለእነሱ መተዉ ሙያዉን ያዛልቃል።

ፕሮፌሰሩ ብዙ የምያዉቁ እና ብዙ ቦታ የተከሰቱ መሆናቸዉን ታሪካቸዉ ይናገራል።

አያና ብሩ ህይወቱ በአሰቃቂ ሁኔታ ማለፉን ኣላዉቅም ነበር።

እንዴት ነበር የኢትዮጵያ ፖለትካ ከአብዲሳ አጋ ለኢትዮጵያ የመቆም ጀግንነት፣ አያና ብሩ ለሃገር ቅርስ ሰርቶ በአሰቃቂ ሁኔታ ህይወቱ ማለፍ፣ ወደ ተለይቶ መጨቆን ወርዶ፣ ከዛም ወደ ቃልቻ ቃሉን ቅኝ ገዛ ዘቅጦ፣ ኢትዮጵያን በማፍረስ ችግሯ ይፈታል እስከመባል ደርሶ የነበረዉ? በኣጭር የታሪክ ግዜ ዉስጥ?

ማን ነበር ተበደልኩ ባይ ታማኝ ኣገልጋይ ስለሚሆን ተፈልጎ ይቀጠራል ያለዉ? ድሮ ተበደልኩ ባይነቱ ዘንድሮ ኣገልጋይነቱን ስለማይገልጽለት።

ፕሮፌሰሩ ሚኒሶታ የኦሮሞ ጥናት ማህበር የተባለ ስብሰባ ላይ የኢትዮጵያ ኣቀንቃኝ ስለሆኑ እንዴት ይጋበዛሉ የሚል ክርክርን ኣስታዉሳለሁ። ያኔ የእኛ ኣይዴለም ብለዉ የተከራከሩት ኣሁን ኬኘ ብለዉ ብቅ ቢሉ እንዴት ነዉ ኣለመዝለፍ የሚቻለዉ? ትህትና የዳበረ ባህልን ኣይገልጽም ለማላት ሳይሆን የዳበረ ባህልም ቢሆን የምያዘልፍ ነገር ፍጹም የለም ወይ ብሎ ለመጠየቅ ነዉ።

ስለፖለትካ ለየት ያለ አስተሳሰብ ያለኝ ፖለትካ እንደ ጋብቻ ሳይሆን እንደ ቤት እና ቤተሰብ ነዉ።

በተረፈ እናት ምድራችንን እንደሆቴል ማሳየታቸዉ ይደንቃል። አጠገባቸዉ ብሆን ምን ኣለ ብያንስ እንደመናፈሻ ብያየዋት ብዬ እንጫወት ነበር።

DefendTheTruth wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 08:33

Noble Amhara wrote: ↑

16 Jun 2024, 07:15

Very impressive wisdom for a person of welega descent.

Noble Asama,

what about if Wollega was to discipline the likes of Prof. Iziekel Gabissa (telling him not in my name) and appreciate the likes of this professor?

How many wollegians have ever promoted the idea of this prof. and denounced that of Iziekel Gabissa?

The difference between the two is that Prof. Ephrem tries to think about what is talking (a sign of scholarly wisdom) while Iziekel is so repulsive and doesn't even care about what he is blabbering (a sign of ignorance).

Wollega has the choice to choose between the two!


BTW., please be honest and answer the following question: I remember someone under a different nick, who once stated in here and openly said something like "people are having fun by driving the ignorant youth of Ambo to their certain death in the name of protest", to which I reacted angrily and the guy didn't use that nick since then in here for long time. I am wondering why you sometimes depict some sort of similar trait with that guy, do you know him or related to him in some way?

So, you aren’t the source of your buddy who you claim to have read on this forum about some people having “fun” at the “ignorant” protesters and that you aren’t having “fun” about it as we speak?

I ran into your comment here after listening to the interview and something standing out to me as unusual in Ethiopia.

As I listened to the interview, for the first time, it sounded to me that there were places in Ethiopia that did not protest against Italy’s occupation. Did I hear the interview wrong or did the Professor imply that people of Najo lived under Italy’s occupation without protesting against it?

If you have listened to it, can you enlighten me if I missed something in it?

It has led me to ask a bigger question. Didn’t they have Fanos during that time? Who were the Abebe Aregai, Belay Zeleke, and so on of Najo? Pardon my ignorance about them. I wish to learn about their history.

Also pardon my ignorance about protesting when necessary even if some had “fun” about it behind their backs. Jagama Kello was about 15 or so when he protested against Italy’s occupation. Mamo Mezemer protested and paid his life for it. I suspect they weren’t afraid to die when they started protesting. If that is the case, it is called conviction, not ignorance.