Mereja.Forum

One is based on the same old and used to thrive of having more, in other words "greed" (B3W), while the other is based on the principle of give and take, live and let live, (BRI).

Finally, the B3W presents terms and conditions for joining the initiative, including human rights preservation, the rule of law, and corruption prevention. In reality, however, the Middle Eastern countries are plagued by problems.[20] Given their predicaments and priorities, it seems unlikely that regional governments would subject themselves to the conditions required under the B3W when they could more easily continue to seek benefits without such terms and coonditions under the BRI framework.

https://www.mei.edu/publications/build- ... iddle-east

We know only very good what has happened to our own land in the last couple of years through the so called AGOA in the name of the same "terms and conditions", which is imposed by the same entity which is a plaintiff and judge in one.

Compare that with the saying

"There's enough on this planet for everyone's needs but not for everyone's greed"

, attributed to Mahatma Gandhi.

Our Eritrean brothers and sisters should make their minds in due time and opt to either the path of greed or live and let live.