TE EXCLUSIVE
Gießen: How Greens want to use violence to ban a festival
Matthew Nikolaidis
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/daili-es- ... stival/amp
(Software translation)
Sat, July 22, 2023
The Giessen Eritrea Festival made headlines nationwide this year. It had previously taken place eleven times peacefully. The reason: a militia with a political agenda is targeting Eritrea festivals in several countries with threats of violence. The Giessen Greens have allied themselves closely with the opponents of the Eritrean leadership.
Screenshot: via twitter
A week ago, riots caused displeasure in Gießen. For one Saturday, the entire city center was a no-go area recommended by the police. Some traffic axes were also blocked. This is neither good for business nor for gastronomy or for a relaxed stroll. This is how a medium-sized German town is put into a state of war. And that was exactly the intention of the “
demonstrators” who had traveled there, disrupters and rioters. In fact, peaceful demonstration was not an option for these fighters or opposition figures, the leaders declared it useless. But who is responsible for the violence in Gießen, the simple threat of which called 1,000 police officers from five federal states and the federal police into action?
It was about an Eritrea festival that had been held in the Gießen Hessenhallen for twelve years, the necessity of which some politicians might dispute in retrospect. But who decides whether a festival can take place or not? In Germany, it is the authorities who are bound by rules, and in the end sometimes the courts, who have to weigh up whether an event disturbs public peace and order or not. In this case, the Giessen Administrative Court overturned a ban issued at the last minute by the Mayor and Head of Public Order
Alexander Wright (Greens).
In the ban, the mayor referred to wild threats of violence against the festival, which is organized by the Central Council of Eritreans. This is a kind of umbrella organization for the Eritrean communities in Germany. Membership certainly requires basic loyalty to Eritrea, which is not unusual, even if there can of course be a conflict with loyalty to Germany. A woman who attended this year's festival says to the camera on the
Hessencam YouTube channel that her family lives in two cultures. She carries a small German flag and defends the festival as her "
home" that cannot be taken from her.
Are organizers responsible for riots by opponents?
According to the administrative court, the Central Council and the Hessenhallen, in which the two-day festival took place, had presented an adequate security concept. This was confirmed to a certain extent by the trouble-free course of the event itself inside the exhibition halls. Although the festival gave the "
cause" for the riots, the organizers had not
caused a disturbance of public safety or order through their own behavior,
according to the court
https://www.giessener-allgemeine.de/gie ... 93914.html.
The Senate does not share the subjective theory put forward, according to which the purposeful causer deliberately brings about the dangerous situation that finally occurred or at least accepts it with approval.
The organizer of the festival is not to be held responsible for the violent excesses of the opposing party.
According to his own statements, Mayor
Frank-Tilo Becher (SPD) wanted to give in to the announced acts of violence even earlier than his head of public order, Wright, did
https://www.giessener-allgemeine.de/hes ... 95700.html. This is remarkable, as it reflects a current discussion in the media and parts of politics, which assumes, in a simplified way, that the organizers of the Eritrea Festival are also responsible for the excesses of their opponents. An assumption that would have to lead, for example, to the fact that many football games with imminent fan excesses could no longer take place. Controversial events of all kinds would also have to be canceled. Any controversy that displeases any small or large violent group could be on the Index.
Violent excesses at the "Eritrea Festival" in Giessen
For the operator of the Hessenhallen,
Roland Zwerenz, a "
simple ban" is not a solution either. As a trade fair operator, he cannot carry out
a moral assessment
and is rather bound by law and order.
And in this case that means that he has to rent without discrimination, also taking into account the obligation to contract, which often applies to a property of this size (as well as to city halls). The
relationships and backgrounds of the drastic events with the violent disruptors who have arrived
must be clarified
in the legal and social context,
said Zwerenz to the
German Press Agency.
In addition, the trade fair operator provides answers in its own press release.
https://www.messe-giessen.de/presse/pre ... -festival/
When Zwerenz said that slogans like "
no sales to..." reminded him of "
dark times", the local press immediately accused him of a "
verbal slip-up". But can one also contradict him on this point
http://uis.maeweb.de/zeitung/view.php?aid=88942?
The highly moral reasons of the Giessen Greens
The balance sheet of July 8, 2023 in Gießen is at least 125 criminal proceedings, mostly for breach of the peace by the “
demonstrators” who arrived and fought street fights with the police officers. The police headquarters in Giessen expects further allegations as soon as video recordings and other evidence have been evaluated. So who are the disruptors that triggered all this? This answer must be surprisingly differentiated.
Over the years, a highly characteristic mixture has developed in Giessen, which first erupted last August at a concert and then on July 8 of this year around the Giessen Eritrea Festival. In the background, the work of the Giessen Greens is of crucial importance. There are ten-year-old videos showing the city councilor of the Greens,
Klaus-Dieter Grothe, holding a rally right in front of the exhibition hall and telling some people of African descent that this festival cannot take place here.
Klaus-Dieter Grothe: Protest against the Eritrea Festival in Giessen
Grothe's reasons are – how different for a Green? – highly moral. The country is a military dictatorship, he says in the video from 2013, and they are not allowed to hold a festival in Germany, which of course costs money and where the participants pay admission. Something must follow immediately from Grothe's “
moral outrage”, even if it more than touches the brink of violence.
The politician should appear again and again in the context of the festival as well as a concert in August 2022, where he obviously had nothing against the new "
path" of his East African protégés, who distinguished themselves with brutal violence for the first time this year. Grothe had also traveled to this "
protest" with the minibus and megaphone. He also appeared in direct, physical solidarity with
Tsehainesh Kiros, a Giessen activist of the anti-Eritrea cause. The Green also associated himself with a double movement, a “
twin path” that he must have seen through if he is as great a local politician as he likes to think of himself.
Incidentally, Grothe is a child and adolescent psychiatrist and chairman of a
Support Association Psychosocial Center for Refugees in Central Hesse eV.
In this capacity, it is rumored that he also issued certificates about psychological trauma for "
refugees". In Gießen there is an initial reception center for asylum seekers from the state of Hesse. Recently, Grothe has been working as a psychiatrist again in the Kara Tepe camp on Lesbos, the replacement building for Moria - mediated by another Green,
Erik Marquardt, MEP and NGO operator on Lesbos and in Islamabad, organizer of the so-called "
Kabul Airlift". .
Legalistic procedure was only "Plan A" of the opposing groups
But first it must be said: Eritrea festivals have existed in many countries for many decades and so far they have not led to similar outbreaks of violence, not even in Giessen, where the festival has been held annually since 2011. The festival was also quiet last year. But a concert planned for August became the occasion for an unprecedented mobilization of opponents of the event.
In the run-up, seven organizations had tried to have the concert, which ran as an "
Eritrean cultural festival", banned. In addition to the "
Eritrean Bright Future" based in Frankfurt, this also included the so-called "
Mothers' Initiative" from Giessen itself, which is led by Tsehainesh Kiros. The application for a ban was rejected by the Giessen administrative court, since the judges ruled out a violation of the applicant's rights.
But the legalistic procedure was apparently only the “
Plan A” of the opponents of the event, who are actually more than that: It has become clear in the meantime that it is a party in an East African civil war or war that is thus taking root in Europe and Germany has. After the failure of "
Plan A" (to have the cultural festival banned through an application), "
Plan B" followed for the first time last August, which, to put it briefly, involves the use of violence.
This “
twin way”, as TE found out thanks to an informant who knows the language, is firmly anchored in the program of the opposition forces – let's call them that provisionally. It is therefore an overall plan in which some groups, in close cooperation with actors from German politics, are making initial attempts at pressure and suppression against legitimate and legal events in Germany. If such actions are unsuccessful, then the above-mentioned “
Plan B” takes effect, in which extreme violence is openly threatened – on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany.
Direct threats against the festival, "indirect" against the police
The city of Gießen was confronted with such a threat shortly before the start of the Eritrea Festival this year. The officials of the public order office had found TikTok videos that contained "
concrete threats" against the event and its visitors, as well as threats against the police, which the Gießen public order office described as "
indirect". The ringleader of the agitating group
Brged Nhamedu, a certain "
John Black", has a high reach of up to 2,000 viewers with his videos. In them, the middle-aged man issues death threats against the participants of the Eritrea festival: some would not survive the festival. On the other hand, this “
John Black” doesn't think much of peaceful demonstrations and doesn't want to take part in them.
DEATH THREATS BEFOREHAND
Gießen: Greens fueled conflict over festival – 26 injured police officers
Other app users even threatened the elderly, women and children. A "
militia", of which no one knows exactly what they are asking, is calling for war against another group of people. And since this war is to take place in a medium-sized German town, the Hessian police also becomes involuntarily combatants. She, too, is being targeted by the "
oppositional forces" who want the Eritrea Festival to be canceled. The brigade's logo is a clenched fist with the signature "
Our Victory with a Fist."
Thanks to our informant, an Eritrean who grew up in Germany, TE learnsthat "
John Black", also known as the four-star general, is
Yohannes Abraha, residing in Utrecht, The Netherlands. He appears as the leader of the militant organization Brged Nhamedu (English "
Brigade of Mother Earth"). The name of the brigade, the Eritrean-born informant tells us, means that the brigade members are willing to give their blood for "
mother earth". This also seems to make sense of the name of another organization, the "
Mothers' Initiative" of Tsehainesh Kiros, that close friend of the Gießen Green Party Klaus Grothe, who last year refused to distance herself from the violence against the concert promoters and organizers exercised by Messe Gießen.
Next "John Black" wants to destroy Sweden...
The organization "
Bright Future", which was founded in Switzerland in 2016 and was one of seven applicants in the Gießen application for a ban, seems to be somewhere between plan A and B in the "
twin path". Their openly stated goal is the overthrow of the Eritrean government. They are unideological and strive for a constitutional reform for Eritrea towards a more democratic organizational form. Their leader can be seen at gatherings along with "
John Black". Together they prevented an Eritrean concert in The Hague through road blockades and disruptions.
Meanwhile,
Facebook entries show the "
General" in a party mood. The dances of joy that he and his followers perform in front of the cell phone camera are explained with the words:
John Black after Gießen Festival
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php? ... 3075112809.
Another post suggests that no Eritrea festival should take place in Sweden either. In another, the “
general” announces that he next wants to “
destroy” Sweden because it is a stronghold of his opponents.
So this is the supposedly light-hearted side of this "
general". His movement has members in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, Norway and elsewhere. Often it is newly arrived asylum seekers who attract the attention of the upper echelons in order to recruit them to their own cause. In many cases, however, the simple origin - often from the Ethiopian Tigray, not from Eritrea - should suggest membership in the combat association.
A
blog associated with the brigade (
https://nhamedu.noblogs.org/post/2022/09/16/about/) calls for a “
free Eritrea” as well as a “
free Tigray”.
Tigray is a border region between Eritrea and the rest of Ethiopia, sharing a language (Tigrinya) with one of Eritrea's main tribes. In Tigray there is the powerful People's Liberation Front (TPLF), which initially supported Eritrean independence but has now turned into a competitor.
Today there are moves in Tigray to unify Eritrea with an independent Tigray which would no doubt cause turmoil and disorder throughout the region. Above all, it will not please the Eritreans, who believe that the possibly authoritarian President
Isaias Afwerki is doing a respectable job by giving the young country support. These are East African issues that would not concern us - if they were not now being dealt with on German soil.
"Brigade General": Our language is announcements and strikes at the same time
That the fight of this militia associated with Tigray called Brged Nhamedu in the middle of Europe is really only violent can easily be verified by the video speeches by Yohannes Abraha alias "
General John Black". In a video made the day before the attack, he says:
A man speaks once and then strikes again. Our language is announcements and strikes at the same time. Tomorrow the world will be witness. We made a clear announcement to the city and police of Gießen and asked them to ban the festival. "One belongs to the "oppressed and peaceful".
Nevertheless, Abraha's words are also, and above all, threats, also against the police, which on July 8 also became quite real opponents of the militia. The Eritrean informant finds it incomprehensible that threats of violence against the police in Germany do not lead to increased vigilance long in advance. In retrospect, he is surprised that state security has not yet intervened.
The opponent could not oppose the brigade, however, he was just "
a piece of cake". Abraha announces that he will simply walk through the entrance to the fair and then destroy everything. He then calls on his followers to travel from all over, which no doubt happened. This is perhaps followed by the key sentence:
If we can do this, there will never be any more events like this anywhere in the world.
You will first try to reach your goal with an "
e-mail" to the authorities:
But if you don't comply with the request, we have to fight for our rights.
Here you can see the abysmal situation in which the German state is - together with other EU countries - after randomly taking in "
refugees" from half the world. Any single interest group, as long as it is violent enough, can play Brged Nhamedu's game. And these groups exist, whether with roots in sub-Saharan Africa, in North Africa, or in the Middle East. The recent mass brawls in the Ruhr area should have taught us that some clans, extended families or downright tribes believe they have their own rights and live by them.
The green OB-to-be also used violence
But it goes even further in the speech of the "
General". According to him, Gießen will be "
brutal" and "
destructive":
The world will talk about it.
This is nothing less than a terrorist announcement for Germany and other countries that should learn that Brged Nhamedu - whoever was behind the militia stands – will not abide by the rule of law in Western Europe.
"
Many disgusts" could come to the fighters in the course of this "
operation". What is meant is the resistance of the police:
Injuries, dog bites and imprisonment.
In this respect, the general's speech resembles the educational camps of the “
climate glue”, which are also made aware of state funds. And the opponents, according to Abraha, would not only appear "
in full gear", but might also have
howitzers, dogs and horses
with them.
Other comrades-in-arms say they will throw stones at festival-goers (says a woman who fears the men will not accept her as a fighter), others speak of broken bones and "
stitched heads" after Brged Nhamedu's victory would lose meaning. A fighter (
Michele "
Warzema"
Weldegabr) who is exemplary from the point of view of the "
Brigade" is currently in custody in Gießen for alleged attempted murder.
And the Giessen Greens are connected to all of these figures quite directly. Of course, the mayor and mayor-to-be, Alexander Wright,
https://www.giessener-allgemeine.de/gie ... 97675.html distanced himself from the acts of violence in good time. But the fact that they take place was also part of the strategy he was pursuing when he wanted to have this year's festival banned shortly before - with the very argument that the "
General" had given him. As recently as July 1, 2023, groups pursuing the “
twin path” of legalism and violence were able to call for a press conference in city-owned premises (at the city convention center), including Tsehainesh Kiros and
Ruth Bahta (United4Eritrea). “
Bright Future” was also involved, and its chairman had traveled all the way from the Netherlands.
The young country of Eritrea is going its own way
It may also be interesting to note that the young state of Eritrea is currently going its own way in East Africa. Although they are open to cooperation, they do not want to be dependent on support from Europe. You want to remain independent and independent of "
aid" from other countries. Does such behavior bother the German Greens, who have to place their “
aid money” everywhere in the name of improving far-flung countries in Africa or Central Asia? Foreign policy has long been pursued here as a higher level of development policy with a German-European guilt complex behind it.
The Islamic scholar and ex-diplomat
Alfred Schlicht, who is also the author of a monograph on “
The Horn of Africa” and a guest author for TE,
https://www.tichyseinblick.de/gastbeitr ... n-auswahl/ said on the Internet radio station
Kontrafunk that Green foreign and human rights politicians initially had hopes in the current Eritrean government, but then they did were disappointed by the authoritarian course of President Isayas Afewerki. From then on, the Greens seem to have defected, indiscriminately supporting opponents of the Eritrean President.
On the other hand, one can criticize the lack of democratization process, which was also interrupted because of the war with Ethiopia. Critical voices within Eritrea are calling for this process to be resumed. But none of this seems to have anything to do with the Gießen scenes, which may be about politics, but in the end the free basic order in Germany was attacked. According to our Eritrean informant, conscientious objectors and deserters can now return to the country without fear of punishment.
A natural fighting community: Greens and “immigrants”
If you look at the work of the Greens in Giessen, you get the impression that they are obsessively destroying those areas of society they are concerned with. Some will now say that is understandable, given their hatred of the status quo. In this case, however, it is particularly puzzling. Because the attack that the Giessen Green City Councilor Grothe has been leading for more than ten years could ultimately be directed against an institution that the Greens hold in high esteem: German asylum law. Greens like Grothe are probably under the illusion that this legal institution cannot fall. They may think that every "
protection" burden on the country should be tried until it reaches the overload, which they might not even think possible.
But why do they also fuel conflicts between different refugee groups that could ultimately break the system? In short: the Gießen case seems to be a case of extreme naivety, as is commonly associated with the Greens. But perhaps there is also something self-destructive here. So why do people do this?
The answer to the question asked is probably: because they cannot do otherwise. The connection between green politicians and a certain type of "
immigrant" has become symbiotic to such an extent that a natural fighting community has long since formed. Any opponent is fought today, the Central Council of Eritreans in Germany and its festival in Gießen in central Hesse. At the same time, however, the legal system in this country is being trampled on, disregarded and ultimately broken. Here not only should all solidarity of green politicians stop with the obvious violence, but above all the solidarity of all citizens with them.