Post
by Naga Tuma » 15 Feb 2023, 20:59
I am back to this topic as I wrote I would be a few days ago. In specific, I am back to Horus' simple assertion that I quoted above. It is totally opposite to the late Ethiopian Laureate Tsegaye Ghebremedhin's observation in 1964 in Borana where he wrote ለካ ኣንተ ነህ።
I have read Horus write on this forum that he grew up learning from the works of the late Ethiopian Laureate. So, either the late Ethiopian Laureate as his teacher must be wrong or that Horus as his student must have been wrong that he grew up learning from his works.
I am not a student of history. The only thing I remember from my required Ethiopian history course in college is the day when I said እዉነታቸዉን ነዉ የሚታገሉት in front of my dorm mates and friends after a particular lecture. We had attended a lecture about the battle of Adwa. It was during that particular lecture that I learned for the first time that it didn't go all the way. I still remember the stunned look one of my dorm mates and friend from Gondar gave me after hearing what I had to say. It came across that it was not a politically correct thing to say. I knew it was a conceptually correct thing to say, which mattered to me as a college student. As a young student of applied science, history was not of much interest to me.
I was in Addis Ababa when the TPLF arrived in Wallaga. Somebody was listening to its rowdy radio broadcast that could easily take an ordinary listener for a ride. I heard it incidentally while somebody else was listening to it. I clearly remember hearing in that rowdy broadcast ብሔር ኦሮምያ! The messenger being the TPLF was offensive and insulting. I have never looked back ever since about the message and the messenger combination. Later happenstances only reinforced it.
I was in college here in the U.S. when I incidentally saw the word Tiye in a National Geography documentary, which aired on PBS. The documentary relates to some history in ancient Egypt.
It got me interested in further readings. I am fortunate to have come across the works of Sigmund Freud in Moses and Monotheism and Ahmed Osman in Moses and Akhenaten.
It is on this forum that I started to read Horus as one of the participants. I do not know him personally. However, my first impression of him hasn't changed to this day. He comes across as a thinker who has risen above that threshold of being beholden to one's own knowledge. There have been times when I wished for real that he would be the one to fill the gap left behind by Sigmund Freud and Ahmed Osman when it comes to Ethiopia's ancient history in a solid manner.
He still leaves me with the desire that he rises above the litmus test of letting the facts of Ethiopia's ancient history trump his ego. I have yet to find a single instance where he would say that he erred. Has anyone else noticed it? If this observation is correct, that would be failing the litmus test of facts trumping egos. Individuals with egos are not good for an elevated healthy debate.
I am positive that he is familiar with something called brutal peer review. It is brutal based on facts. It is not personal. It humbles you and makes you a better scientist. The same thing goes for becoming a better thinker.
No, I am not asserting that I know better about ancient history because history is not my expertise. However, I ask questions about it as they arise and try to engage or debate in order to learn more. I think I know how to engage on the facts and I have come across intellectuals on this forum who let facts trump their egos at a moment's notice. ህማንቴስ ኣይዴለህም፣ እሺ?
If we have elevated our debates to the level where facts trump egos, we would have left behind something helpful in meaningful ways to the future generations of Ethiopians. This is the main reason for me to get back to this topic, which evidently does not appear to have risen to that level. That is what Horus' simple assertion without an explanation suggests.
This is even more important in light of the still fresh memory of the Ethiopian Student Movement in Ethiopia that is party to the 1974 revolution in Ethiopia. Yes, the Feudal System in Ethiopia before then was oppressive as it was elsewhere as a system of government. Was that revolution the best way to solve the problem?
It was a few years ago that I came across a political paper authored by the late Dr. Senay Likke. Reading it came across that there was a generation of Ethiopian students who were ገና እንደተመረቁ ሁሉን ኣወቅን ባዮች።
I am sure there were many bright minds among them. Then again, bright mind doesn't mean bright experience. The expression that when the rubber meets the road makes that distinction clear. If universities are rubber factories, real world experience is the test for when the rubber meets the road.
By being party to the revolution, the bright minds helped bring down the Ethiopian leader that brought them up. The aftermath of the revolution sacrificed largely his investment in education in Ethiopia. Even though I was a child then, I am positive that it is a combination of various things that led to a national tragedy.
I am also positive that Lencho Leta, who I have heard speak publicly on various occasions, is a survivor of both urban and guerrilla movements in the aftermath of that revolution. Then again, the following simple statements he expressed publicly or wrote in his book underscore the importance of elevating the contemporary debate in Ethiopia.
ማንነቴ ቦረና ነዉ።
አኙዋክም ነዉ።
ስለኦሮሞ ማንነት ስታገል ኖሬኣለሁ።
ኢትዮጵያዊ ለመሆን እደራደራለሁ።
Yes, history now notes that identity politics was one of the factors in the revolution. A struggle for a stable country that is righteous for all of its citizens could have been an alternative to the revolution.
In my parents' generation, I do not remember Afan Oromo speakers as ኦሮሞ ጎሳ። They knew ቦረነ፣ ገበሮ፣ ሲዳመ። They referred to Amharic speakers as ሲዳመ። In my generation, people who identified themselves as Muslims in Hararghe were taught to identify themselves as Oromo. Today, there are many who fail to distinguish ጎሳ from ዘር። How many of them can clearly define these simple terms that they use routinely? It should be important to raise the debate to a level where the ability to define a term needs precedence over the ability to use it.
I do not think that it is farfetched to say that one of the historical countries in Africa was on the verge of destabilization not so long ago.
The activism of some of us against destabilization of the country and righteousness for all of its citizens is based on this background in recent history of Ethiopia. As some expressed their views in this regard, there were some that had the nerves to accuse them of treason. Those who wrote for a British protectorate in Africa had the nerves to accuse those who stood against it.
Yes, unity of purpose was the call of activists to stand against the TPLF when it was dominant or perceived to be dominant in Ethiopia. Yes, there was also a call to elevate the activism to Ethiopia's ህዳሴ and later ግስጋሴ። Horus, do you or your ባሻ know one of the primary sources of this call? No, I am sure you don't. You are welcome to clap for it.
What is more, we still have the unanswered question about why Afan Oromo stands out in at least one simple metric and about ኼረ፣ ኼር፣ ኬር፣ ብኼር፣ እግዝኣብኼር። The latter should be in Horus' expertise to explain based on something that he said he knows about well enough: ኬር። Add to that the question that I asked a while back on this forum, which is whether the Cushitic and Semitic division is an artifact that you learned in school and repeat ad infinitum or if it is real.
In summary, when this debate can be elevated, should it be lowered?