It's known that meles, once said that, under every OPDO is an ''OLF.''
In other words, if you are an Oromo with dignity, who stands up for your people, you're an OLF.
But, if you assist in the subjugation of your people, then you're an OPDO, and a good Ethiopian.
There is no middle ground according to those who adhere to this type of thinking.
So now, you have some Amhara, the keyword being: SOME, who accuse Abiy of being an ''OLF Shane,'' because of what exactly? Because of tragedies in Oromia, that they attribute to OLF? Even though, OPDO can easily arrange for such attacks, and then blame ''Shane,'' since ''Shane,'' would win in any free and fair election in Oromia- hence why he had to target OLF's political leadership after luring them there from Asmara- similar to what his former bosses, the TPLF did, with assistance from Shabia mind you/and the EPRDF puppet parties, in the transitional era.
I think most of it, is because, they want Abiy to go all out and destroy Oromia, sanction it, deny it any room to breathe, any semblance of normality, farm, etc, and even block it off, like they did in Tigray. They want to destroy Oromia and level it, as they did Tigray. If abiy doesn't do this, and commit massive rape, genocide, blockade, starvation, etc, in Oromia, like he and his allies did in tigray [from various reports], then... he is automatically 'OLF SHANE,' even though he fears olf more than anyone does, be it amhara nationalists or other than them.
Even though his forces and their allies, are already savage enough when carrying out operations in Oromia, this isn't enough for some.
-
Sadacha Macca
- Senior Member
- Posts: 12808
- Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 16:46
Re: My theory as to why some accuse abiy of being ''undercover shane.''
So now, you have some Amhara, the keyword being: SOME, who accuse Abiy of being an ''OLF Shane,'' because of what exactly?
what makes you think only amharas accuse Abiiy? mr agame man,why do you find it foggy when it comes to telling the facts on the ground?