Page 1 of 1

Uncovering CIA-Funded Experiments On Children In Europe During The Cold War

Posted: 01 Feb 2022, 01:30
by Zmeselo


Uncovering CIA-Funded Experiments On Children In Europe During The Cold War

https://thedissenter.org/uncovering-oth ... -cold-war/

January 31, 2022

Was the CIA involved in sponsoring West German pedophilic foster homes overseen by the Social Democratic Party?


Original CIA headquarters building finished in 1961 (Photo from CIA's government website and in the public domain)

On January 26, The Dissenter covered how the CIA funded unethical experiments on Danish orphans for at least two decades from the early 1960s onwards.

These grim trials https://thedissenter.org/cia-funded-exp ... r-decades/ were conducted as part of the mind control program MKULTRA, which was secretly farmed out overseas as it wound down https://web.archive.org/web/20170123105 ... 0001-1.pdf in the United States due to the threat of exposure.

A 1963 CIA Inspector General report https://ia801205.us.archive.org/1/items ... 017748.pdf shows that the expansion worldwide had unfolded for some time.
It does not follow termination of covert testing of MKULTRA materials on unwitting U.S. citizens will bring the program to a halt. Some testing on foreign nationals has been occurring under the present arrangements,
the document stated.
Various U.S. deep cover agents overseas would appear to be more favorably situated than the U.S. narcotics agents to perform realistic testing.
As such, it’s reasonable—and indeed vital—to ask, where else in the world did the CIA support unethical human experiments on vulnerable and defenseless youths?

West Germany, the country forged in May 1949 from the military occupation zones of the U.S., United Kingdom, and France, could be one place where the mind control program expanded.

Helmut Kentler and the Pedagogical Center

At precisely the same time that CIA-directed psychological torment of Danish orphans was underway, authorities in West Berlin were dabbling with something even more diabolical - state-endorsed pedophilia.

Psychologist Helmut Kentler advocated in the 1960s for placing vulnerable youths in the care of pedophiles—on the ostensible basis https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-authoritie ... a-53814208 that
loving environments
would effectively integrate them into society.

An influential figure, Kentler used his extensive political connections to market his ideas directly to lawmakers and state institutions.

Kentler established the Pedagogical Center in February 1965 to conduct various tests and trials. The results were supposed to help educational authorities develop best practices for nurturing the nation’s youth.

Fully endorsed by the city’s Senate and Social Democratic Party (SPD) and West Berlin Mayor Willy Brandt, the Center was granted a multi-million dollar budget, along with 37 staff. It was overseen by SPD Senator for Schools and Education Carl-Heinz Evers, who knew Kentler personally. (Brandt later served as West German chancellor 1969 - 1974.)

Children in West Berlin were sent https://taz.de/!450552/ to live with pedophilic foster parents at Kentler’s direction in 1969.

Kentler's ideas gained increased currency in the wake of incendiary student protests, https://globalsolidaritylocalaction.sit ... -activism/ which erupted across much of the Western world the previous year. These mass actions revitalized the writings https://www.patreon.com/posts/meet-german-from-60420980 of Austrian psychoanalyst Wilhelm Reich, in particular his early 1930s works The Sexual Struggle of Youth and The Mass Psychology of Fascism.

Reich’s thesis was suppression of sexuality went hand-in-hand with obedience to authoritarianism, as an individual’s perspectives and predispositions were formed during their formative years. The argument went that it was necessary for people of all ages to become sexualized, and embrace their sexuality.

The resurrection of Reich’s ideas was no doubt welcome to West Germany’s occupying powers. The notion Germans were psychologically and genetically disposed towards aggression and dictatorship—and that German society needed to be drastically reordered to blunt these tendencies—was widespread in the aftermath of World War II.

In fact, the U.K. and U.S. had long-pursued wide-ranging social engineering efforts
to that end.

A key architect was Scottish-born psychiatrist Donald Ewen Cameron, http://www.edutarian.com/2011/08/donald ... ctive.html who played a significant role in the Nuremberg trials. His work The Social Reorganization of Germany argued Germans craved strict order and regimentation delivered by strong leaders, and these inclinations were fostered during childhood. He went so far as to advocate restrictions on which Germans could have offspring as a result.

Cameron’s shaping of post-war Germany is largely forgotten. Strikingly, he is more well known for his contributions to the MKULTRA program. He sought to create https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad- ... te.rtf.pdf a real-life
Manchurian Candidate
for the CIA via various macabre means, such as forcing his patients to listen to hours of audio messages while under the influence of a drug cocktail that left their mind a
blank slate,
onto which new behaviors could be programmed.

The monstrous technique was called https://books.google.al/books?id=QEQIEA ... al&f=false
psychic driving.
While it failed to produce remote-controlled humans as hoped, its “primary values” were said to be
penetration of defenses [and] elicitation of hitherto inaccessible material,
which may account for why Cameron’s methods of sensory deprivation https://www.salon.com/2007/06/07/sensory_deprivation/ and psychological torment were widely practiced https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/worl ... o-bay.html on Guantanamo Bay prisoners in the "War on Terrorism."

The Likelihood That The CIA Encouraged The Kentler Experiments

An independent University of Hildesheim investigation https://hildok.bsz-bw.de/files/1109/Opp ... glisch.pdf of the Kentler experiments published in June 2020 concluded that a "network” of actors
tolerated, strengthened, and legitimized [deleted] positions [and] also arranged and justifed pedophilic assaults in foster homes, shared apartments and other care constellations.
These actors systematically covered up
physical, sexual, or emotional mistreatment of children.
The fundamental element of this nexus was the Social Democratic Party (SPD). It dominated West Berlin’s assorted political bodies and local governmental departments at every level, and one of the young boys
https://rtd.rt.com/stories/not-just-ano ... ing/housed with a [deleted] claimed the party’s West Berlin branch
deliberately selected
him for the experiment.

Acccording to CIA whistleblower Philip Agee's 1978 book Dirty Work, Langley played a pivotal role https://www.rt.com/op-ed/536156-spd-suc ... ction-cia/ in managing the SPD and shaping its policies throughout the Cold War. He claimed West Germany was
one of the most important operational areas for far-reaching CIA programs, designed to create an internal structure…which would be pro-American and anti-Communist, and to secure commercial interests.
The CIA supported not only the CDU (Christian Democratic Union), but also the SPD and the trade unions,
Agee wrote.
The CIA wanted the influence of the two major political parties to be strong enough to shut out and hold down any left opposition…[those] movements had to be discredited and destroyed.
CIA units involved were
charged with special responsibilities for making contact with organizations and people within the political establishment,
such as the SPD and its elected representatives.
All information collected
was then used
to infiltrate and manipulate these organizations.
Such penetration surely accounts for the SPD repudiating its radical Marxist roots in 1959 http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/pdf ... 0FINAL.pdf and abandoning all commitments to challenging capitalism.

As Agee described, during this period the CIA worked “systematically” to ensure
socialist parties of the free world [toed] a line compatible with American interests.
Did the Agency moreover sanction if not outright encourage the Kentler experiments? Was Kentler a
U.S. deep cover agent overseas,
in the CIA Inspector General report’s phrase?

Whatever the truth of the matter, that document also called for MKULTRA experiments to be conducted in dedicated operational settings with strengthened
structure and controls.
Foster homes and orphanages may have represented ideal environments from the CIA’s perspective. This certainly seems to have been the case in Denmark, as its central population register meant children experimented on could be tracked over the course of many years.

At the very least, it strains credulity to believe the CIA was not well-aware of what Kentler advocated. In fact, one of the Pedagogical Center’s key founders and planning committee members was James B. Conant, the first U.S. Ambassador to West Germany and adviser on educational issues in West Berlin from 1963-1965.

Conant was invited to join the center by Mayor Brandt, and the CIA-connected https://www.ratical.com/ratville/CAH/FordFandCIA.html Ford Foundation. A 1983 National Academy of Science obituary http://www.nasonline.org/publications/b ... 3-1978.pdf records Conant

played a critical role in rallying support for this project,
eerily adding,
he unquestionably had an influence on adjustments that have been made in German education.
European Countries Should Seek Answers

It was not until several years after Kentler’s death in July 2008 that his work and legacy was critically examined.

Shockingly, multiple contemporary obituaries paid positive tribute to the psychologist. Berlin daily newspaper Tageszeitung, which avowedly provided https://taz.de/!450553/ a figurative soapbox and megaphone to pedophiles and pro-[deleted] organizations, deemed https://taz.de/!836663/ Kentler a
meritorious fighter for a permissive sexual morality.
In fact, the University of Hildesheim’s probe dok.bsz-bw.de/files/1109/Oppermann_Kentler-Englisch.pdf represented the first truly extensive insight into Kentler’s experiments. It exposed how the psychologist’s narrative of events—that he had sought to place at-risk youths in caring environments in the sincere but dangerously misguided hope it would be beneficial for them, and these trials were short-lived and limited in scope—was completely false. Nonetheless, this was for many years accepted and endorsed even by critical media outlets https://www.dw.com/en/berlin-authoritie ... a-53814208 and academics.

Hildesheim's report showed facilitating abuse of foster home residents, vulnerable or not, was always Kentler’s primary objective, and the management of [deleted]-run accommodations of this type continued until at least 2003.

That year, the foster home of Fritz H (a pseudonym) was closed, having opened 30 years ago. In that time, 10 youths passed through its doors, some simultaneously. Fritz was said to have “constantly and proactively” looked for new foster subjects all along, in a manner that was “unusual”.

Two children, who spent time in Fritz’s home, “impressively” reconstructed their experiences to University investigators, reporting
opaque and incomprehensible procedures, massive experiences of violence and abuse in many instances, and [the] strong influence
of Kentler on the residence.

Among documents related to Fritz’s foster home, a
large number of strong signals in the record,
such as a psychologist’s report, proof of completed legal proceedings regarding child abduction and child sexual abuse, a critical assessment by the Health Office, and an autopsy after the unexplained death of a child in Fritz’s custody, were identified, which should have prompted officials to critically reassess his suitability as a foster parent.

Instead, Fritz was regarded as a
robust and immune figure,
and the West Berlin Youth Welfare Office even defended him.

There is no reason to believe he was alone.

West Germany was dotted with shared [deleted]-run accommodations, where
sexual transgressions and assaults took place
for decades throughout the Cold War.

Another victim interviewed by the university was placed in a foster home run by West Berlin’s District Office in the early 1980s as a youth. He testified to his adoptive father’s “sexual transgressions and assaults,” child pornographic material he found in the man’s possessions, and letters he wrote to authorities about the monstrous conditions in which he lived. No authorities took action.

Those tasked with administering these vile experiments were allowed to commit awful crimes against vulnerable children for many decades. They benefited from a strict code of silence on the part of officials. A similar dynamic existed in Denmark, where authorities shredded records related to CIA experiments on orphans after learning the criminal conspiracy was finally being scrutinized by outsiders (decades after the fact).

An urgent need exists for potential CIA connections to the Kentler scandal to be independently investigated. Moreover, all European countries should work to uncover which abusive experiments or programs involving children were supported by the agency during the Cold War.



_________________________





Re: Uncovering CIA-Funded Experiments On Children In Europe During The Cold War

Posted: 01 Feb 2022, 02:50
by Zmeselo


Chinese State Media Slams Soros As "The Most Evil Person In The World" And "The Son Of Satan"

BY TYLER DURDEN

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/chine ... -son-satan

MONDAY, SEP 13, 2021



It didn't take China long to respond to George Soros after he went nuclear on Beijing and US investment titans abandoning their "ESG ideals" to capitalize on China's massive market.

Over the weekend, China’s state-run tabloid Global Times labeled George Soros a
global economic terrorist
in a [deleted] for tat exchange playing out in dueling op-eds that underscore the rising temperature in US-China relations, the Standard https://www.thestandard.com.hk/section- ... na-attacks and Asia Times reported. https://asiatimes.com/2021/09/chinese-s ... exA_U1Iwc4

The article, published on September 4, accused the billionaire hedge fund manager and liberal donor and Democrat supporter of providing finance to Hong Kong’s jailed newspaper owner Jimmy Lai to support the city’s anti-Beijing protests in 2019.

Soon thereafter, Soros penned an op-ed for the Wall Street Journal that https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/soros ... -hypocrisy said New York-based BlackRock’s recent $1 billion mutual fund investment in China was a “tragic mistake” and would lose money for the asset manager’s clients. Soros wrote the BlackRock investment
imperils the national security interests of the US.
That followed an August 30 op-ed Soros published https://www.ft.com/content/ecf7de34-e59 ... 5119187330 in the Financial Times that said Chinese President Xi Jinping’s crackdown on private enterprise has been
a significant drag on the Chinese economy
and
could lead to a crash.
Soros said indices such as MSCI’s ACWI, ESG Leaders Index and BlackRock’s ESG Aware, have
effectively forced hundreds of billions of dollars belonging to US investors into Chinese companies whose corporate governance does not meet the required standard — power and accountability is now exercised by one man (Xi) who is not accountable to any international authority.
The billionaire urged the US Congress to pass legislation limiting asset managers’ investments to
companies where actual governance structures are both transparent and aligned with stakeholders.
Previous reports said that Soros’ hedge fund had disposed all of its exposure to Chinese assets earlier this year.

Having made a name (and $1.1 billion ) for breaking the Bank of England in 1992, during the Asian financial crisis in 1997, Soros also tried to break the Hong Kong dollar’s peg to the US dollar but was ultimately defeated by the Hong Kong government, which intervened heavily in markets to protect the peg. Soros was given the nickname
financial crocodile
by local media at the time.

In September 2001, Soros was invited to visit China and met then Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji in Beijing. But after the 2008 global financial crisis, Soros told media in October 2009 that China should step up to the plate as the leader of a new global economic order.

Then, in January 2016, Soros told a dinner audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos that
a hard landing is practically unavoidable
for the Chinese economy.

A few days later, the People’s Daily, China’s Communist Party mouthpiece, warned that
Soros’s war on the renminbi and the Hong Kong dollar cannot possibly succeed – about this there can be no doubt.
In January 2019, Soros said Chinese President Xi Jinping was
the most dangerous enemy
of free societies for presiding over a high-tech surveillance regime.

He said,
China is not the only authoritarian regime in the world but it is the wealthiest, strongest and technologically most advanced.
He also said China’s ZTE and Huawei telecom giants should not be allowed to dominate the world’s 5G infrastructure rollout.

But the Global Times’ “economic terrorist” label is a new escalation in the feud between the two.

The Global Times’ commentary, titled
This global economic terrorist is staring at China!,
claimed Soros only started to criticize China because he felt regret after disposing all his investments in Tencent Music, Baidu and Vishop earlier this year.

The article added that his Open Society Foundations financed Human Rights Watch, which it claimed spreads “rumors” against China over recent matters in Hong Kong and Xinjiang as well as the origin of the Covid-19 pandemic. The Global Times commentary also claimed Soros had colluded with Apple Daily founder Jimmy Lai to try to start a “color revolution” in Hong Kong in 2019. It also described Soros as
the most evil person in the world
and
the son of Satan.
This is not the first time a sovereign country has slammed Soros as "satan": several years ago his native Hungary said https://forward.com/news/384828/george- ... stian-eur/ George Soros is “Satan" and his agenda is one that
from its heart hates Christian Europe’s traditions and civilization.
In a speech entititled
The Christian duty to fight against the Satan/Soros Plan,
András Aradszki, the government’s secretary of state for energy, framed his ruling party’s long running campaign against Soros for the first time in explicitly theological terms.

Linking Soros to
abortion, euthanasia, same-sex marriage, and the forced politicization of gender theory,
Aradszki declared from the floor of Hungary’s parliament Sunday,
The Soros mercenaries do not cite the Holy Father’s thoughts on this.
He added:
Soros and his comrades want to destroy the independence and values of nation states for the purpose of watering down the Christian spirit of Europe.
Citing an alleged plan by Soros for to forcibly settle
tens of millions of migrants
in Europe, Aradszki declared,
The fight against Satan is a Christian duty. Yes, I speak of an attack by Satan, who is also the angel of denial, because they are denying what they are preparing to do — even when it is completely obvious.
Going back to China, AsiaTimes reports https://asiatimes.com/2021/09/chinese-s ... exA_U1Iwc4 that the Global Times article was widely republished by mainland websites and cited by Hong Kong and Taiwanese media over the past few days.

The Global Times was not finished, and in a separate op-ed, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202109/1233743.shtml the Global Times wrote that:

George Soros, who is despised by many around the world for triggering and profiting from crises, started a fresh campaign against China's economy over the country's recent regulatory actions. But like his repeatedly failures and massive losses in betting against the world's second-largest economy before, Soros' latest attempt is not only doomed to fail but will also erase any credibility he still has when it comes to China.


The Global Times was also concerned by Soros' criticism of BlackRock’s massive new investment in China and Xi’s regulatory clampdown, however it had little to worry about: when it comes to China, Larry Fink's ideals are just as flexible as the Fed's mandate for how many bonds and ETFs the asset management giant should buy on its behalf.

In April 2021, BlackRock Chairman Larry Fink wrote in a letter to shareholders that
the Chinese market represents a significant opportunity to help meet the long-term goals of investors in China and internationally
and provides the company an opportunity to help address the challenge of retirement for millions of people in China.
As China’s capital markets continue to open to foreign firms, BlackRock has taken meaningful actions to expand our onshore presence and respond to the needs of our clients,
Fink said.

Last August, China approved a wealth management joint venture between BlackRock, Singapore state investor Temasek Holdings and China Construction Bank. In May this year, the joint venture, which is 50.1% owned by Blackrock, 40% by CCB and 9.9% by Temasek, was granted a license by Chinese regulators.

So far Soros' attempts to hinder US investments in China by asset management giants have been met with scorn and mockery