Mereja.Forum

Abiy’s Biltsigna Will be the Last Pro-Amharanet Regime After 750 Years! 

No question that Abiy’s regime is a pro-Amharanet dictatorial one just like the previous others since 1270. All of them were determined to keep the existing domination of Amharigna/Amharanet at the cost of Oromiffaa/Oromummaa. Oromo prosperitans supporting Abiy Ahmed are comfortable with the existing domination and never dare to promote Afaan Oromo to its legitimate leadership position based on demographical advantage of the Oromo. That is why few Amhara elites are riding Abiy Ahmed and his few Oromo prosperitan supporter to maintain their domination of the empire. I hope this will change soon through the bitter struggle of genuine Oromo republicans, who definately shall promote Oromiffa/Oromummaa to its  legitimate primary position, so that all institutions of the country like the palace, parlament, government, courts, militray, security….etc will use Afaan Oromo primarily, by replacing Amharigna. With that accomplishment, Abiy’s Biltsiginna shall be the last of the hitherto pro-Amharanet dictatorial regimes.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2016 ... kelly-inn/

Unfortunately, Abiy’s Biltsiginna is becoming as fascist as Mengistu’s Derg and Meles’s Woyane. The extrajudicial assasination of the young boy in Dembidolo shows explicitely all the fascistic actions this regime took till now in Oromia, Tigrai, Amharia…etc. It is the matter of time that any regime, which kills its people will perish. Both Derg and Woyane lost power despite the strength they had and showed. Biltsiginna can not be otherwise. The Million dollar question to be answered now is: who shall follow? Amhara Repessors, who want to keep the existing domination of Amharanet (camouflaged as Ethiopiawinet) at any cost or Oromo Republicans, who definately will implement the legitimate leadership of Oromummaa in the genuine rainbow Ethiopiawinet of about 80 colours (linguistic identities)?. Now, it is high time for Oromo republicans led by the OLF and OFC to be empowered and lead the Oromo in this final phase of our liberation struggle.

ጦጣ እራስ! ሌላው ኢትዮጵያዊ እጆቹን አጣጥፎ ይቀመጣል. ብዙዎች የሚሉት አብይ አህመድ የኦነግ (ሸኔ) የመጀመሪያው ጠቅላይ ሚንስትር ነው። የመጨረሻው እንደማይሆን ግን እርግጠኛ። ቀጣዩ ጠቅላይ ሚንስተር በችሎታ ከሱማሌ፥ ከአፋር፥ ከጉራጌ፥ ጋምቤላ ወዘተ ይሆናል። 84 ጎሳዎች አሉ ኦሮሞ 1/84ኛ ነው ድርሻው። ሁሉ ለእኔ ለእኔ እያስጠላችሁ - የዝንጀሮ መንጋ ይመስል።

OPFist wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2021, 16:19

Unfortunately, Abiy’s Biltsiginna is becoming as fascist as Mengistu’s Derg and Meles’s Woyane. The extrajudicial assasination of the young boy in Dembidolo shows explicitely all the fascistic actions this regime took till now in Oromia, Tigrai, Amharia…etc. It is the matter of time that any regime, which kills its people will perish. Both Derg and Woyane lost power despite the strength they had and showed. Biltsiginna can not be otherwise. The Million dollar question to be answered now is: who shall follow? Amhara Repessors, who want to keep the existing domination of Amharanet (camouflaged as Ethiopiawinet) at any cost or Oromo Republicans, who definately will implement the legitimate leadership of Oromummaa in the genuine rainbow Ethiopiawinet of about 80 colours (linguistic identities)?. Now, it is high time for Oromo republicans led by the OLF and OFC to be empowered and lead the Oromo in this final phase of our liberation struggle.

Tegaru hegemonists finally lost never to come back again. Thus, there is no more triangular struggle (Amhara-Tegaru-Oromo) for power in Finfinne palace. Now, the conflict is more of a dicotomy: dictatorial Amharanet vs democratic Oromumma. Amharanet is still dominating the palace and all federal institutions. Oromo elites, from Yekuno to Abiy, ruled Ethiopia in order to promote Amharanet at the cost of Oromummaa. Dictatorial Amhara elites are rallying behind the PAE (pro-Amharanet elites) of Oromo nation led by Abiy Ahmed as long as Amharanet/Amharigna is dominating. The Oromo national struggle should focus against such Amhara dictators. Tegaru elites are done; Amhara elites should yet be checked.

Actually, the Oromo already defeated the assimilative Amhara elites during the first phase of our struggle in 1991 and got rid of the hegemonist Tegaru elites through the second phase in 2018. Now, our struggle is in the third and final phase to overcome the obstacle from the Pro-Amharanet elites (PAE) of the Oromo led by Abiy Ahmed.  These elites are satisfied with Afaan Oromo as secondary to Amharigna at federal level. They are dedicated to keep the existing Amharanet dominated dictatorial federation. On the contrary, Pro-Oromummaa elites (POE) in the OLF and OFC are pushing further to realize democratic federation in which Afaan Oromo will have its legitimate and right position of being the primary working language of the whole country. That means, it will be the main language of communication in the parlament, cabinet, palace, justice, military, security and other federal institutions.

Otherwise, how surprising to observe that the pro-Amharanet Oromo elites could control Finfinne palace again. This trend is going on since 1270 and we thought that we changed the trajectory in 2018 as Abiy took the PM position. Unfortunately, Abiy betrayed Oromummaa and opted to keep the dominance of Amharanet being masked with Ethiopiawinet. Oromo struggle for freedom is again at square one. Now, our struggle is not necessarily against the explicit Abyssinian elites, but against the very subtle pro-Amharanet Oromo elites led by Abiy Ahmed. This phase of our struggle will be the most bitter for it divides the Oromo camp clearly in to two: the incumbent pro-Amharanet vs the opposing pro-Oromummaa! How pity that the true Oromo nationalists lost in the last three revolutions because of the self-beating Oromo elites: 1) 1974 the Oromo head of state Col. Mengistu fought against the OLF (the symbolic face of Oromo’s bilisummaa/freedom). 2) 1991 the Oromo presidant Dr Nagasso was against the OLF and 3) since 2018 the Oromo PM Abiy Ahmed is sabotaging the OLF.

No question that Derg style Ethiofascist Abyssinian elites, who try to instrumentalize Ethiopian unity and Woyane type Ethnofascists, who attempt to use Ethnic liberty are dead never to come back again. But the hybrid Biltsiginna (combining both Ethio- and Ethnofascism) is still ruling. Now the two federalist blocs of Oromian elites (Ethiofederalists like ECS & EPP as well as Ethnofederalists like OFC & OLF) are flourishing on the grave of the two fascist camps against the hybrid current regime. The ongoing and future democratic competition in Ethiopia (Great Oromia) can only be between these two federalist blocs. As long as Oromo’s AAA (Aadaa/culture, Afaan/language and Aango/power) are not compromised, the two types of federations (geography based Ethiofederation and language based Ethnofederation) are not disadvantageous for the Oromo. But, it seems the Hybrid-federalist Abiy is pro-Amharanet and against the promotion of AAA at federal level.

To explain this fact, let’s look back at certain event. The burning issue for all Ethiopians in the year 2012 was the Oromo people’s national liberation struggle, which was led by the vanguard front – the OLF. A lot of things related to this century old struggle was controversially discussed. The sparkling event for the debate was the decision taken by certain Oromo nationalists at a meeting convened at Kelly Inn in St. Paul, Minnesota, on January 1, 2012, where the group claimed to have changed the OLF political program. This step was interpreted by most Oromo nationalists as a betrayal of the objective of the Oromo national liberation struggle by the group

Was the step taken by General Kamal a betrayal or was the allegation based only on an interpretation given by other Oromo nationals to the action of the group? If it was a betrayal in reality, then a betrayal of what? Betrayal of the whole Oromo objective or that of only one side of the goal? To answer these two important questions, let me operationally define the term betrayal. Betrayal (or treason) is the breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations. Often betrayal is the act of supporting a rival group, or it is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others. Someone who betrays others is commonly called a traitor or betrayer.

Was Kamal’s group a traitor in this sense? What were the presumptive contract, norm, objective, trust or confidence amongst Oromo nationalists in the OLF? Who was rival group of the OLF supported by the breakaway group? I personally understood that the comprehensive Oromo’s objective is the right to national self-determination, including independence or integration (union), based on the Oromo public verdict per referendum. OLF’s goal is also not far from this, even though the vanguard organization either emphasizes a mandatory national independence or stresses a voluntary regional integration based on objective realities and situations. It was clear that Kamal’s group explicitly abandoned Oromian independence as an objective. I can call it as a betrayal to only one-side of the original aim; it was actually a betrayal to the core of the goal. It seems that the move of the group was designed to limit the right of Oromo nation to only one-side of the objective. This was absolutely wrong; as long as Oromo nation was under subjugation, I think no need of giving up independence as the alternative, unless otherwise, it was a rhetoric made under the gunpoint as, for instance, the OFC at home was doing.

In all my hitherto articles, I advocated an imperative unity of Oromo liberation forces and an important alliance with the other anti-TPLF forces in order to be efficient in our struggle for freedom of Oromo from the past ruling fascist and racist regime. But, I have tried to show also what sort of alliance could be different from the previous ones and make a difference on the ground. For example, I once wrote:
“… I am personally against any sort of dictatorial unity, and I am supporter of a possible union of free peoples in the empire/region based on free will of the respective peoples. Any unity without Oromo’s public verdict will fail, take it only 1 year, about 10 years or as long as 100 years. That is why I do advocate for a lasting solution based on free will of all stakeholders, instead of the temporary wishy-washy solution. Some organizations seem to have chosen unconditional unity as a precondition for the alliance against the EPP, but the unity they do strive for will surely never last long, because it is not based on accepting self-determination of peoples, but based on a predetermination of future fate of peoples by only few elites. The future possible alliance against EPP, which may be forged by the OLF et al. must be based on a solid ground by taking self-determination of nations, rather than unconditional unity of the empire, as precondition for an alliance …”

I was not expecting alliance based on a precondition set by Dr.Berihanu and on a predetermination made by General Kamal, but a stable and strong alliance based on the self-determination of nations as a common ground. Unfortunately, both Berihanu and Kamal seemed not to be ready for such all-inclusive and effective alliance, which could have brought the militarily stronger OLF and ONLF on board. But yet, that was not end of thöäe game, we could have this better option if we all would have come to our sense and be ready to be ruled by public verdict, be it the Oromo people will decide for independence (having ethnofederalism as a prelude) or for integration (with ethiofederalism as prelude). The steps taken by both Berihanu and Kamal have got certain fallacy.

A) That of General Kamal:
– his group of Oromo nationalists should have waited till there will be unity of Oromo nationalists in the liberation camp, so that they can go to the cooperation with the anti-TPLF Abyssinians having a united backing of the strong Oromo constituency, the majority of which the General seemed to lack.

– if the majority of the Oromo constituency was not behind the group, it is both strategically and symbolically a mistake for the move of Kamal can be interpreted as a victory for the anti-Oromo Abyssinians, who were celebrating the step taken by him.

– even if the General had support of the Oromo majority, giving up the core aim of national independence was a great mistake as long as the Oromo nation was under a colonial subjugation.

– as I did hear in the rhetoric of Kamal’s group, it included AG7 into its “we” discourse, and denounced the other Oromo nationalists, who opposed its move, as “they” and the “others,” so that it considered itself as a part of the AG7, but not as part of the other Oromo nationalists.

– General Kamal′s declaration of being Ethiopian citizen, whereas this name, Ethiopia, was already contaminated with the dirt of the oppressive Abyssinianism, so that it can not be palatable for Oromo nationalists, who were struggling for Oromian liberation from Abyssinian domination. The group could have demanded a change of the name of the future new union it envisioned to be Oromia, replacing the designation Ethiopia for the Oromo nation as a majority in the empire is the titular nation, which does have the legitimacy to claim and deserve the name change.

– the readiness of Kamal’s group to speak a broken Amharinya in all forums, be it in real or virtual world, instead of demanding from the AG7 to start using Afaan Oromoo, if the later genuinely wants to be called a multinational movement as it wishes to be seen; the fact on the ground is that AG7′s media outlet (ESAT) is promoting and using only Amharinya by neglecting and oppressing Afaan Oromoo for many years.

– General Kamal should have been cautious enough not to be seen as a horse of AG7; if the group had the Oromo majority behind it, surely it could have played the role of a horseman riding the AG7; good news is that time showed us who was the horse and who the horseman; of course, the optimal solution had to be partners to each other in the possible alliance, not one of them being a pawn for the other.

OPPfist, ኣይተ ዕቁባይ hahahaha
Mr. ዕቁባይ busy [deleted] your assigned none of Oromo business as usual.

OPFist wrote: ↑

25 Dec 2021, 16:45

Tegaru hegemonists finally lost never to come back again. Thus, there is no more triangular struggle (Amhara-Tegaru-Oromo) for power in Finfinne palace. Now, the conflict is more of a dicotomy: dictatorial Amharanet vs democratic Oromumma. Amharanet is still dominating the palace and all federal institutions. Oromo elites, from Yekuno to Abiy, ruled Ethiopia in order to promote Amharanet at the cost of Oromummaa. Dictatorial Amhara elites are rallying behind the PAE (pro-Amharanet elites) of Oromo nation led by Abiy Ahmed as long as Amharanet/Amharigna is dominating. The Oromo national struggle should focus against such Amhara dictators. Tegaru elites are done; Amhara elites should yet be checked.

OPFist,
I think this is plausible assumption. The triangular tension is going to go obsolete. This simplifies our military and diplomatic regain over the traditional enemy of Oromo nation to end the dichotomy nature of just began struggle. I am not sure where TPLF subordinates itself but if wise may ally with Sudan or Eritrea or Oromo or stand alone

አንድ ቂል 11 አህዮች ነበሩት። እንድኛዋ አህያ ላይ ተቀምጦ ሌሊች 10 አህያዎችን ይነዳል። ድንገት ትዝ አለው እና አህዮቹን ቆጥሮ 1 አህያ ጠፋችኝ ብሎ እራሱን ይፎክት ነበር ያባላል። ጅል አፍቃሪ ኦነግ የፓለቲካ ካልኩለስ (ሂሳብ) ይህን ይመስላል። እንድህ እያሉ ያፋሽካሉ << ትግሬ እና አማራ ጥላቶቻችን ናቸው። አሁንትግሬን አሸንፈነዋል -አጥፍተነዋል፤ የቀረን አማራ ብቻ ነው።እነርሱን በቀጣይ ማጥፋት ነው ይሉናል።>> ሌሎች ኢትዮጵያዊ ጭራሽ ከሂሳቡ የሉም። እንዳው ለመሆኑ ትግሬንስ ትንፋሹን አዳምጣችሁ አረጋግጣችኋል ስለመሞቱ - የጅብ ችኩል ቀንድ ይነክሳል። እናንተ ይህን ሁሉ ሂሳብ ስትሰሩ ሌላው እጁን አጣጥፎ ቁጭ ይላል? እውነቱ ይህ ነው የተቀመጥክባት 11ኛዋን አህያ ጠልዞ አንተን 12ኛ አህያ እድርጎ ይነዳሃል። ጠብቅ - ይህን የገልቱ ኬኛ ዛርህን ማስታገስ ካቃተህ።

B) That of Dr.Berihanu’s group:
– its [ deleted ] manipulation to divide the OLF made the group to be seen as enemy of Oromo liberation movement; it could have waited till OLF factions unite, instead of starting to work with one group and criticizing the other as it did through its own other media outlet.

– its attempt to put Ethiopian unity as a precondition for the possible alliance against the ruling regime, instead of accepting and respecting the right of nations to self-determination.

– its rejecting the basic right of the Oromo nation to self-determination, be it in a form of language-based federation or as an independent republic, so that it is trying to get rid of Oromia as a national area of the Oromo people.

– its continuous vilification of the Oromo liberation movement as something ‘ye gosa poletika’ (clan politics) and as zerenyinnet (racism).

– its trying to manipulate Oromo mass by instrumentalizing the Afaan Oromoo speaking Vice Chairman, just as it did try to use Aadde Birtukan Midhagsa to fool the Oromo people during the CUD era.

– its visible paternalistic ‘I know for you’ mentality, by which it tried to prescribe a medication for the Oromo problem, while rejecting the solution presented by the genuine Oromo nationals.

– its nostalgic wish to bring back an Ethiopian state, where we all be Amharinized. Its rejection not to give a single hour of transmission in Afaan Oromoo for about 5 years through its highly-financed ESAT was a classical example; 24-hour Amharinya service, but few hours for Afaan Oromoo, for the country in which the Oromo people are the majority, shows the anti-Oromo position of the Ezema. This simple step was the symbol for the vision of Ezema in the future Ethiopia, which it wants to save. After many years, thanks to #Oromoprotest, it started now to broadcast in Afaan Oromo, eventhough both the quality and quantity are not yet enough.

Disregarding these mistakes committed by both Berihanu and Kamal, it was legitimate when most Oromo nationals did protest against the decision at Kelly Inn for only one simple reason: the move was euphorically celebrated by the Abyssinians’ camp, which is traditionally against the right of the Oromo nation to self-determination. To me, only this euphoria was enough to be skeptical regarding the move of both groups. I heard as a child one wise Oromo elderly saying “whenever someone praises you too much, ask yourself where you have committed a mistake.” He told the reality that people praises us, whenever they are getting advantage out of our action, not because the action is right for ourselves. Accordingly, I just asked myself: what mistake did the General commit so that the AG7 and its Abyssinian camp could euphorically rejoice as such? Of course, the main mistake was the explicit giving up of the fight for an independent Oromia, while we are still under Abyssinian national domination. Nothing can make the colonialists happier than the colonized people abandoning the liberation struggle. If the General might have taken this step only tactically (I liked to give the group the necessary benefit of doubt), time would show us the effect. Lately, the u-turn of the General to persue the vision of independence spoke a million about the alliance.

After putting on paper here my own mini-analysis of this situation, let me now try to look into the future. I am still believer of both the imperative unity in Oromo camp and the important alliance with all the anti-EPP forces, if we really want to keep our freedom from the oppressors. The unity was very mandatory, not an option. I know that some Oromo nationalists were skeptical regarding the unity for they think that certain OLF faction could take advantage of it, but I see, from my relatively neutral point-of-view, that there was no alternative to such unity to achieve freedom. Any sort of genuine alliance against the tormentors was also very important, but the alliance should not have compeled any organization to change its political program (as General Kamal did) in order to be the partaker.

Bravo OPFist!!!