Mereja.Forum

[Abe Abraham]

• Angry founder: Palace sit-in failed due to miscalculation
  
  
  
  The founder of the Angry People group, Ahmed Bushra, denied that the failure of the palace sit-in yesterday was due to the lack of leadership in the street, but rather because of the repressive machine that continues to suppress the revolutionaries throughout the day, causing their exhaustion.
  
  He stressed that the Forces of Freedom and Change have become rejected as leadership because they are part of the street. Bushra said in a statement to (Al-Jarida) that the palace sit-in failed due to wrong assessments from the leaders of the Resistance Field Committee, and added: People were not originally planned or thought that they would reach the palace and were not planned for a sit-in, On the one hand, the sit-in has different needs and described the decision to sit-in as hasty, and he continued: The field leadership should have taken such a decision after studying the current situation because it was not sufficiently studied, in addition to the lack of many parties that supported the sit-in and did not rule out the possibility of putting forward a political declaration and alliances beyond the stage. drop in the coming period.
  
  He declared that it was not possible for Qaht to return to lead the street, and he stated, “Certainly, Bohut cannot return because the street’s rejection of her is very clear.”
  
  He denied the existence of any contacts between them and them, but added: But recently, calls came to us from Qaht, and we did not respond to those calls. He affirmed the confidence of an angry group in the resistance committees. He continued: We strongly trust the resistance committees and only participate with their processions, pointing out that the group has not run a procession for some time. In its name, he hinted at the possibility of returning to running separate processions if they sensed a slackness in the resistance, and he mentioned in this case we will set paths and processions with different dates.
  
  For his part, the head of the Social Democratic Unionist Party, “Hashd,” Siddiq Abu Fawaz, said in response to a question about the lost street leadership and its impact on the success of the resistance committees in reaching their goals, he said that each bears responsibility for his positions, and the Sudanese revolution is able to produce new leaders, and our country has not yet been imprisoned. He revealed that a dialogue is currently taking place between political forces, resistance committees, professional associations and unions, and a new revolutionary leadership will emerge very soon.