Mereja.Forum

Digital Weyane wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2021, 11:36

ዋይ ዋይ ዋይ ዋይ ዋይ!

Digital; back in 2015 CIA medicare on Eritrea by saying "there is no crack in the country"
That how a country have to guard your nation from this Haynes. They will come to you with AID, religion, human right, press freedom, giving embassies unfettered accesses to your nation. unless Ethiopia is learn from Eritrea, they are dangerous and i fear.

When I came across this report, the first thing that came to my mind was the following simple juxtaposition:

1) "A land of righteousness where no one was wronged" said by Prophet Muhammad Circa 615 A.D. to his early followers who were seeking refuge, and

2) Wanton wronging in the 20th century in faraway countries on different continents as admitted by a former CIA employee, presumably funded by America's taxpayers.

The time span between the two is over 14 centuries. Moreover, the normal trajectory of progress is toward what is right, toward perfection, not toward what is wrong.

Then, I had to ask to whom this taxpayer-funded agency is accountable. In other words, who is its grandmaster that makes judgments about whether some very basic ideas are right or wrong?

Assuming there were American diplomats who were aware of the wanton wronging, how were they facing the countries in which they lived as honorable guests? Those who are still alive, how do they face those countries now? What are the prerogatives of the International Criminal Court in such matters?

Was it the late Reverand Desmond Tutu who asked: "Why do people do the wrong things when there isn't enough time to do the right things?"

Some people can imagine righting the wrong. Some others have the capacity to imagine wronging the right. The struggle for independence from colonization was right. Wanton wronging of that noble struggle is not right. How can one think of noble when one fails to tell apart right from wrong?

In the long history of humankind, from where did the organic sense of sorting out the right from the wrong come? If it has come naturally to any part of humanity, that long history would be very reflective of that organic sense.

According to this report, this American taxpayer-funded former CIA official did not appear to have an organic sense of sorting out the right from the wrong until it occurred to him to abandon the ship he was on. The organic capacity to sort out the right from the wrong takes an evolution. When you borrow it, you lose it unwittingly. There is deep wisdom in የሰዉ ወርቅ ኣያደምቅ።

You can read Socrates. You can read Plato. You can read Aristotle. How can you have their experiences if you haven't belabored like them and evolved out of it?

Thomas Jefferson was a racist. However, he has evidently read them at least in part. Having once come across a short letter authored by him, I don't think even he would approve of this wanton wronging. I imagine that if he were alive and heard it, he would rise to say that the sectarian Republic he had the capacity to imagine has been turned into a criminal enterprise by its own citizens and collaborators with funding by the Republic's taxpayers. If I am not mistaken, this is unprecedented in the history of Republics. So, no wonder if one of its founders was doubtful from the outset that the Republic could be kept.

Hillary Clinton may also have read the works of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Yet, she had an organic sense of writing and publishing this wanton sense of wronging a different country in the 21st century by having its parties in conflict slug it out and watch it indifferently. I came across that unwitting reflection in her book. Evidently, it didn't read as something that is innately wrong to do, let alone write and publish it.

Such an insider story by an American former covert official builds on my suggestion as an outsider that America in 2021 is an evolving state.