Mereja.Forum

Inclusive Revolution of Oromara is the Best Way to Get Rid of Biltsigina, as it Was Against Woyane!

Interestingly, we are back to square one. Ethiopia was under the very brutal rule of the fascist and racist TPLF. Above all, the TPLF regime was targeting Oromo people and our resources as well as Amhara people and their land. In order to subdue (“likki le masgebat”) these two big nations and to continue its ongoing exploitation, the leader of TPLF, Abay Tsehaye, once showed his arrogant bravado. We got rid of EPRDF about 3 years ago through inclusive revolution. Now, Tegaru’s hegemony is done, but unfortunately the same oppression is back. Thanks to Dr. Abiy, the dictators could survive and are now thriving as EPP. They are doing their best to suppress genuine democrats of the Oromo, Amhara, Tegaru, Somali, Sidama…. etc with the pretext of promoting Ethiopiawinet. Especially, they started to instrumentalize the histrical stand off between the two big nations in order to polarize and divide the opposition against EPP. Also EPP is victimizing both Amhara people and the Oromo. In order to get rid of this new oppressor, we need as before an inclusive revolution against the incumbent. Hier again, Oromara (Oromo - Amhara alliance) is very mandatory.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2017 ... d-of-tplf/

Oromo only knows how to drink innocent people blood get lost you evil zeregna you are just as bloodthirsty as Mengistu and his qey shibir for Oromo authoritarianism

OPFist wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2021, 11:12

Inclusive Revolution of Oromara is the Best Way to Get Rid of Biltsigina, as it Was Against Woyane!

Interestingly, we are back to square one. Ethiopia was under the very brutal rule of the fascist and racist TPLF. Above all, the TPLF regime was targeting Oromo people and our resources as well as Amhara people and their land. In order to subdue (“likki le masgebat”) these two big nations and to continue its ongoing exploitation, the leader of TPLF, Abay Tsehaye, once showed his arrogant bravado. We got rid of EPRDF about 3 years ago through inclusive revolution. Now, Tegaru’s hegemony is done, but unfortunately the same oppression is back. Thanks to Dr. Abiy, the dictators could survive and are now thriving as EPP. They are doing their best to suppress genuine democrats of the Oromo, Amhara, Tegaru, Somali, Sidama…. etc with the pretext of promoting Ethiopiawinet. Especially, they started to instrumentalize the histrical stand off between the two big nations in order to polarize and divide the opposition against EPP. Also EPP is victimizing both Amhara people and the Oromo. In order to get rid of this new oppressor, we need as before an inclusive revolution against the incumbent. Hier again, Oromara (Oromo - Amhara alliance) is very mandatory.
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2017 ... d-of-tplf/

What a rotten head is over your neck?

You were scribbling all along, as far as I opened your trash here and over flew them, just about the fight and possible war between Amhara and Oromo.

Now the same head coming back and scribble about Oromo and Amhara cooperation?

This is beyond words for me.

I re-wrote this opinion initially being motivated by one OFC’s statement regarding one of its past election campaigns, where it wrote: “Our plan is to use the opportunity to mobilize millions for next round of the struggle. To this end, we have already ordered three million leaflets among others. We call upon all to join us in the all-round struggle of our peoples for freedom and democracy.” What a well-formulated mission! Then, I modified my idea a bit just to air my opinion also regarding an intimidating message from the leader of TPLF.

እቃ በናጣ ኣብረን በላን ሆኖብን ነው አንጂ ከሰው ኣራጅ ጋላ ጋር አንኩዋን ኣብሮ ለመስራት ዋስትና ይስፈልጋል። አናንተ ኣንድ ቀን ኣረቄ ጠጥታች ሁ ውይም ኣንዱ ከላካች ሁ ልትገድሉን ሰለምትችሉ አዛው በሩቁ ነው ከናንተጋር መጠጋት ኣይመከርም።

It is clear that we had “election” ritual in Ethiopia; no one with sound mind expected fair and free election under the EPRDF rule, but the process can be used for mobilization of oppressed nations and help an inclusive revolution be sparked. Yet, we like it or not, there was a big ‘elephant in the room,’ which we all tend to evade, but the TPLF effectively exploited; i.e. the conflict: ‘pro-integration’ Amhara elites Vs. ‘pro-independence’ Oromo elites. This conflict was the main area of fear hindering cooperation in possible inclusive revolution against the EPRDF regime. The pro-integration elites did dream and wished that the whole Ethiopian peoples share their vision, and pro-independence elites also wanted that pro-integration elites come to their sense and struggle for freedom of their respective people from TPLF colonization, so that such free peoples can live in the future as good neighbors to each other. Both blocs expressed their respective wish, and they did consider as if their point of view is the only truth on ground, but TPLF knew very well that these two camps were not in a position to trust each other; its cadres exploited this situation to hinder the Tsunami of inclusive revolution from erupting against the regime in Cafe Arara palace.

I personally saw that it can be the right and suitable time for an inclusive revolution against the dictators in Ethiopia. Almost all citizens and nations in the country were calling for inclusive revolution as the best instrument to get rid of the oppressive regime. That was why TPLF did everything under the sky to prevent us from revolting in unison. We knew that, as long as EPRDF was in power, we all would suffer, not only as refugees in Diaspora, but also as slaves at home in Ethiopia. It seemed that the face-off between the two opposition camps was a hindrance for an inclusive revolution. The face-off was a very good historical advantage/opportunity, which the EPRDF got to rule over Ethiopia without any serious challenge, and this problem  needed an appropriate solution. The TPLF survived and thrived mainly by dividing and polarizing elites of the two blocs as well as by sowing fear among/between them. We heared that both camps live with a strong mistrust to each other, so that they seem to prefer TPLF’s further rule or prefer not to allow each other the possibility of taking over power.

You are advocating for separate separation and we are for unity. What is the point even if we throw the current pp then we have to fight each other.
You and Shamless Abdisa, OLF,OFECO are groups who believe in violence and already spill to many bold. You do not have any interest in compromising and living to gather. Abyi lets you in with your guns in the country, that was a grave mistake or sabotage.
However, PP is 100% better than the Savage Querro and OLF. We would rather support PP as it is or even TPLF for that matter than OLF, OR savage and delusional, ignorant ORoooooooomuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmaaaaaaaa.

አናንተን አኮ ምን አምደምትባልይ ኣታውቅም አንዴ

ጁንታው ቦቲ ኣድርጎ መጣ ነው አኮ የሚሉዋቹ

Try to some thing else realistic.

how stupid do you think we are? oromo radicals have no political agenda, no aim, no goal, nothing nada. your only political aganeda is being anti amhara and anti amharic that drives from a deep seated inferiority complex.

heal your deep seated inferiority complex first you sick man and come up with a political agenda other than amhara/amharic hate. do you think we are fools? you have been writing about amhara and amharic as enemies 99% of the time and now you calling for cooperation with amhara? to do what? so you can massacre innocent people and destroy properties?

you don't need cooperation, what you really need is healing from your inferiority complex sickness.

OPFist wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2021, 16:23

I personally saw that it can be the right and suitable time for an inclusive revolution against the dictators in Ethiopia. Almost all citizens and nations in the country were calling for inclusive revolution as the best instrument to get rid of the oppressive regime. That was why TPLF did everything under the sky to prevent us from revolting in unison. We knew that, as long as EPRDF was in power, we all would suffer, not only as refugees in Diaspora, but also as slaves at home in Ethiopia. It seemed that the face-off between the two opposition camps was a hindrance for an inclusive revolution. The face-off was a very good historical advantage/opportunity, which the EPRDF got to rule over Ethiopia without any serious challenge, and this problem  needed an appropriate solution. The TPLF survived and thrived mainly by dividing and polarizing elites of the two blocs as well as by sowing fear among/between them. We heared that both camps live with a strong mistrust to each other, so that they seem to prefer TPLF’s further rule or prefer not to allow each other the possibility of taking over power.

What is it that you want to accomplish after getting rid of the current "dictatorial" Oromo government by Oromara collaboration? A few days ago it was Orogaru you were scribbling about, and now it is oromara. What is next? OroRitrea? OroMali?

So it seems your end game is Oromizing Ethiopia if possible or separation from Ethiopia if that fails. What is there for the rest of us on the table to come to defend your position? Ohh how we all missed AbeKebe lol

Despite this self-sabotage of the two camps, I thought a well coordinated nonviolent popular uprising) of the Oromo people in cooperation with that of other nations in that country was the best way of struggle to get rid of TPLF. Actually, Oromo people had nothing to lose, if the expected inclusive revolution started. One thing beside many, in favor of Oromo liberation movement, was the fact that TPLF will leave Finfinne palace, only after securing its goal – an independence of Tigrai. With such a move of TPLF, Oromia’s chance to get its independence was high. Because of this reason, both pro-integration conservatives and the Western protectors of the country did not want to see TPLF being cornered. They surely knew that cornering TPLF was tantamount to disintegrating the existing Ethiopian state. That was why, it was not Oromo people, but firstly, TPLF itself; secondly, the colonial-minded conservative elites; and thirdly, their Western handlers, who feared an emergence of an inclusive revolution in Ethiopia. Thus, the democratic pro-unity forces pushing for revolution were not as such dangerous for Oromo liberation movement. Even if not Oromia’s independence per referendum, we can achieve its autonomy within a multinational Ethiopian (Kushland’s) union as a result of an inclusive revolution. But, I believed Oromo’s best interest can be respected more in an integrated democratic Ethiopia. Future accomodative Ethiopia (not past assimilative Ethiopia) serves an interest of the Oromo more thant that of Abesha.

This was one of the reasons that TPLF cadres were very busy to hinder an inclusive revolution from taking place in the country by using manipulation of the difference between diverse peoples, as their instrument of division and polarization. If the scare tactics, which they try to use, would hinder an inclusive revolution, the only option the oppressed peoples had, was the anti-colonial armed struggle, on which we had to concentrate and invest most, even though it was a very difficult job, given the little support we had from the international community. For an inclusive revolution possibly not to take place, unfortunately, pro-independence freedom fighters (i.e. Oromo, Ogaden, Sidama … liberation forces) and pro-integration freedom fighters (i.e. the Agaw-Amhara, Gurage, Harari … patriotic forces) were mistrusting each other. Both camps wanted to secure direction of the move in their respective way after freedom from TPLF. The first bloc wanted no reversal of the already achieved victory of limited cultural autonomy on the way towards national independence (self-determination), whereas the second bloc wanted to be sure that Ethiopia’s territorial integrity stays intact, and possibly, the process be reversed back to unitary state.

But, why should these people worry too much about the situation after the revolution? Was the caution regarding unity from the pro-integration freedom fighters so different from the scare tactics used by EPRDF cadres? These cadres went to pro-independence forums and told that the “worse will come; pro-integration Amhara elites will take over, and an independent Oromia will never be realized, if you push for the revolution;” and then, they went to pro-integration forums and talked “take care, the worse will come; OLF can take over and it will be end of the united Ethiopia, if you make a revolution.” It was the fact on the ground that both Ethiopia and Oromia were taken hostage by the TPLF. Whenever the pro-independence force was stronger, TPLF threatened with the possibility of dismantling Oromia; and whenever pro-integration force was stronger, they threatened with dismembering Ethiopia.

In short, the scare tactics, which TPLF cadres used were – “if an inclusive revolution erupts:

– pro-integration Amhara elites can take over the movement and dismantle Oromia;
– pro-independence Oromo elites will be in power and dismember Ethiopia;
– the TPLF army will massacre civilians;
– there can be a mayhem against Tigrinya-speakers, like that of Rwanda;
– there will be absolute chaos and civil war among different ethnies; etc”

TPLF used opportunity of such division among the opposition to threaten both camps of freedom fighters. If an inclusive revolution really should have happened, the two blocs needed to be bold enough to take risk of losing their ideals after the revolution and to live with a compromise solution. That means, the pro-independence bloc should have been ready to lose, for instance, the possibility of achieving an independent Oromia, and the pro-integration camp needed to be ready to risk their long-term goal of fostering unitary Ethiopia. Otherwise, in short, TPLF was really lucky; there would never be any inclusive revolution under such condition of division between freedom fighters; and the chance to get rid of TPLF through election was, as we knew, very minimal; then, armed struggle was the only option left. In case both public uprising and armed struggle against EPRDF were not effective, should we not prepare ourselves to be ruled by TPLF for the next one century? Not to allow TPLF to rule us for such a long time, we needed to know and tackled the methods it used, specially its scare tactics. In short, the scare tactics, which TPLF cadres used were – “if an inclusive revolution erupts:

Were freedom fighters from both blocs ready to deal with these scare tactics of TPLF? Could they agree on the middle ground: freedom and referendum (self-determination of citizens and nations)? Those, who just fought for unconditional independence of nations, must have cooled down and accept public verdict, as well as those, who struggled for unconditional integration, should have learned to be moderates and accept public verdicts. Both camps must have agreed on first getting freedom from TPLF, and then democratically decide for either independence or integration per referendum (independence or integration based on public verdicts). We liked it or not, all peoples in that region should be free, regardless of their decisions for political independence or for political integration. The political free will of peoples in the country was what matters most at the end.

Unfortunately, there were some nationals in both pro-integration and pro-independence camps – who could not see the common convergent short-term goal of both sides, i.e. ‘freedom from TPLF.’ They concentrated only on their divergent long-term goals: independent state vs. integrated country. Fortunately, few smart nationalists from both sides were emerging and trying to forge an alliance, by default or by design, in order to achieve their convergent common short-term goal and then to decide on their respective long-term goals through public verdict. The dictators were too far from accepting and respecting the free will of their respective public as a final verdict; they preached democracy, but were not yet ready to practice it. We hoped that these few smart and genuinely democratic nationalists in both camps – who tried to practice what they did preach, would prevail to cooperate and make TPLF’s tyranny history. Those who wanted to achieve either ‘independent state’ or ‘integrated country’ per public referendum were the truely democratic nationals from both sides.

Let’s just try to imagine a very big letter ‘Y’ and distinguish four points on the letter (bottom, middle junction, left top, and right top). Then, let’s see that the bottom is the status quo of Ethiopian politics, where the constituencies of both camps are under tyranny of EPRDF; the middle junction is a point for freedom from tyranny; the left top is point of national independence; and the right top is point for regional integration. Then, let’s look that this letter ‘Y’ is a figure to illustrate the route of our liberation journey for both camps, from their present common situation, towards their short-term and long-term goals. Can we percieve that these two camps do have a possibility to move from the bottom (point of tyranny) to the middle junction (point of freedom) together? It is our common route of journey towards common converging short-term goal. Then will come the two diverging routes towards two different and diverging long-term goals of the two blocs: left top (independence) and right top (integration).

From these three ways of struggles for freedom, we have seen that both armed struggle and electoral struggle were not successful. Armed struggle was too slow because of limited support from the so-called international community; and electoral struggle has failed due to undemocratic nature of the brutal rulers. The option of popular uprising had been tried separately by only Oromo students during the years 2001–2017, and by pro-integration urbanites after “election” 2005.