Oromo Elites in two Competing Blocs of Ethiopian Politics: Pro-Amharanet vs Pro-Oromummaa!
Posted: 10 Oct 2020, 09:17
Oromo Elites in two Competing Blocs of Ethiopian Politics: Pro-Amharanet vs Pro-Oromummaa!
Ethiopian (Great Oromian) politics is characterized by two blocs or two visions: pro-Amharanet with domination of Amharigna as entertained by Ezema and EPP as well as pro-Oromummaa with leadership of Oromiffaa at federal level as envisioned by the OLF and OFC. Again the two blocs have each two lines of politics: Ethiofederalism including and up to integration vs Ethnofederalism including and up to independence. From the pro-Amharanet bloc, Ezema is dictatorial Ethiofederalist and EPP is dictatorial Ethnofederalist. From the pro-Oromummaa bloc, both the OLF and OFC are democratic Ethnofederalists, whereas no genuine pro-Oromummaa organization is Ethiofederalist. Previously, Meison of Dr. Haile Fida is used to be pro-Oromummaa Ethiofederalist. The Ethiofederalist line is highly promoted by Amhara elites and the Ethnofederalist one strongly supported by Tegaru elites. Both do that based on their own respective advantage and interest. Amharas think of assimilating the whole country because of the still dominating Amharanet (Amharinya) and Tegarus need to secure their minority status and prevent this danger of assimilation. Oromo elites seem to entertain both. The more confident they are to own and lead the country, they opt for Ethiofederation and the less confident they are vis a vis Abyssinian elites’ cannng manipulation, they prefer security through the line of Ethnofederation. As an example, Halle Fida was in favour of first line, whereas Baro Tumsa was promoter of the second. Now, it seems the majority are marching in the second line. The few like Dr. Abiy, who seem to be open for the first line are suspected as pro-Amhara (pro-Nafxanya).
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2019 ... onfidence/
Ethiopian (Great Oromian) politics is characterized by two blocs or two visions: pro-Amharanet with domination of Amharigna as entertained by Ezema and EPP as well as pro-Oromummaa with leadership of Oromiffaa at federal level as envisioned by the OLF and OFC. Again the two blocs have each two lines of politics: Ethiofederalism including and up to integration vs Ethnofederalism including and up to independence. From the pro-Amharanet bloc, Ezema is dictatorial Ethiofederalist and EPP is dictatorial Ethnofederalist. From the pro-Oromummaa bloc, both the OLF and OFC are democratic Ethnofederalists, whereas no genuine pro-Oromummaa organization is Ethiofederalist. Previously, Meison of Dr. Haile Fida is used to be pro-Oromummaa Ethiofederalist. The Ethiofederalist line is highly promoted by Amhara elites and the Ethnofederalist one strongly supported by Tegaru elites. Both do that based on their own respective advantage and interest. Amharas think of assimilating the whole country because of the still dominating Amharanet (Amharinya) and Tegarus need to secure their minority status and prevent this danger of assimilation. Oromo elites seem to entertain both. The more confident they are to own and lead the country, they opt for Ethiofederation and the less confident they are vis a vis Abyssinian elites’ cannng manipulation, they prefer security through the line of Ethnofederation. As an example, Halle Fida was in favour of first line, whereas Baro Tumsa was promoter of the second. Now, it seems the majority are marching in the second line. The few like Dr. Abiy, who seem to be open for the first line are suspected as pro-Amhara (pro-Nafxanya).
Read more: https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2019 ... onfidence/