Mereja.Forum

Is Oro-garu-mara Triangular Cooperation Possible?

Oromo elites need to learn the world wide known routine of politics: talk international ethos, but walk national interest; for instance talk democratic election, but secure Oromo's AAA (Aadaa/culture, Afaan/language and Aangoo/power) in Ethiopia (Great Oromia) by any means. They don't have to be yewah/naive as Abyssinian elites usually describe the Oromo. The canning Abyssinian elites must be checked persistently and kept at bay from Finfinne palace ( Caffee Araara). Dr, Abiy's attempt of promoting Oro-garu-mara (Oromo, Tegaru and Amhara elites') cooperation should be part of the moral talk, but the good PM need to walk Oromo's national interest.
https://fayyisoromia.wordpress.com/2017 ... he-tplf-2/

OPFis who it is we now know! Tesfaye G/Ebab acting like Oromo. He knows what is coming within Tplf that is why he is seeking union now hahahahah

Now, the triangular Oro-garu-mara cooperation is necessary to transform Ethiopia in particular and Africa in general towards democracy and development. Here, Oromo politicians ought to have a magnanimeous politics of accomodating all nations including the two hitherto dominating Habesha groups. I wish that the Oromo elites forsake the victim mentality and act as victors. I advise Oromo activists change their approach. They better give up their victim struggle against the already defeated Abesha elites and focus on their struggle for noble cause of the victor Oromo nation. They don’t have to waste their resources on fighting against the dead horse, but invest it in promoting their lively and worthy Oromo cause. In this way, the Oromo can lead the very imperative triangular Oro-garu-mara cooperation for common cause of justice to all nations in Ethiopia. Of cource EPP can be used for this purpose. But, is such genuine cooperation possible with the canning Abyssinian elites? I don’t think so. That is why I would like to advise Oromo elites to talk international ethos, but walk national Interest!

Do you write these pieces while hallucinating? How come you argue to convey one point and conclude the exact opposite of what you argued for. I really want what you are having