Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 28 Feb 2020, 20:28

The rule of law shall prevail
Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules

Corporations can be civilly liable for international law breaches; act of state doctrine not a bar

“The Supreme Court showed a willingness to take seriously international human rights law,” says Cory Wanless.

By Elizabeth Raymer. 28 Feb 2020

A Canadian mining company that is a majority owner in a mine in Eritrea may be sued for alleged abuses that occurred in that country, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday.

The Court’s ruling holds that corporations can be held liable in civil law for breaches of international law, and that the act of state doctrine is not a bar to the claim.

The decision stands to have implications for Canadian companies with operations abroad, notably in the resources, technology and armaments sectors.


https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/pract ... les/326872

kebena05
Member
Posts: 3122
Joined: 10 Nov 2019, 14:58

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by kebena05 » 28 Feb 2020, 20:36

:lol: :lol: :lol:
Asswash, you being saying these for 20 plus year and the Camel is still marching despite your Agame dogs worthless barking
Keep barking Uggume

Awash wrote:
28 Feb 2020, 20:28
The rule of law shall prevail
Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules

Corporations can be civilly liable for international law breaches; act of state doctrine not a bar

“The Supreme Court showed a willingness to take seriously international human rights law,” says Cory Wanless.

By Elizabeth Raymer. 28 Feb 2020

A Canadian mining company that is a majority owner in a mine in Eritrea may be sued for alleged abuses that occurred in that country, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday.

The Court’s ruling holds that corporations can be held liable in civil law for breaches of international law, and that the act of state doctrine is not a bar to the claim.

The decision stands to have implications for Canadian companies with operations abroad, notably in the resources, technology and armaments sectors.


https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/pract ... les/326872

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 36874
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Zmeselo » 28 Feb 2020, 20:59

:lol:

The mine is now, in chinese hands (60%). This is b/n NEVSUN and the canadian courts. Nothing to do with Eritrea.

If it goes to court, we'll learn the identity of the accusers. That's the only plus.
(Courtesy of Merhawi G Kidane)

This should be interesting. They’re literally handicapping Canadian companies from competing against others abroad. The Chinese, Russians, Americans, etc now have a slight advantage over them in this regard.

At the end of the day, the new Chinese owner could simply just liquidate Nevsun and call it a day. At that point, don’t expect to get any sort of justice from Zijin in China.

Lastly, if I was the US President, I’d make a play to have Canadian companies domicile in the US because of this ruling.


Awash wrote:
28 Feb 2020, 20:28
The rule of law shall prevail
Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules

Corporations can be civilly liable for international law breaches; act of state doctrine not a bar

“The Supreme Court showed a willingness to take seriously international human rights law,” says Cory Wanless.

By Elizabeth Raymer. 28 Feb 2020

A Canadian mining company that is a majority owner in a mine in Eritrea may be sued for alleged abuses that occurred in that country, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday.

The Court’s ruling holds that corporations can be held liable in civil law for breaches of international law, and that the act of state doctrine is not a bar to the claim.

The decision stands to have implications for Canadian companies with operations abroad, notably in the resources, technology and armaments sectors.


https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/pract ... les/326872
Last edited by Zmeselo on 29 Feb 2020, 00:24, edited 1 time in total.

Digital Weyane
Member+
Posts: 9833
Joined: 19 Jun 2019, 21:45

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Digital Weyane » 28 Feb 2020, 22:22

I agree with my Weyane brother Awash from Adwa that, the lawsuit against Eritrea in a Canadian court means that we Weyane will receive a settlement award payment of billions of dollars for all the mental pain and suffering we had to endure. :evil:

ተሓጎሺ ዓድዋ ዓደይ፣ አሸኒፍክዮም ለዞም ወስፋታማት ሻቦ :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen:

Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 28 Feb 2020, 23:08

UN Human Rights Council Receives Yet another Grim Report on Eritrea

2020-02-27 06:50:57 Written by  EPDP Information Office Published in EPDP News Read 119 times

UN Special Rapporteur for Human Rights on Eritrea, Ms Daniela Kravetz, told the 43rd Session of the UN Human Rights Council on 26 February 2020 that Eritrea is refusing to make any progress whatsoever in basic human rights of its own people.

She said the fact that thousands of Eritreans are fleeing their country is a “telling sign of no progress” in the political and human rights situation in the country.

Since receiving the mandate nearly two years, Ms Kravetz submitted five benchmarks that Eritrea could start making some progress. These include:

Showing progress in rule of lawMaking reform on the national serviceProgress in promoting civil libertiesProgress in women’s rights and gender equality, andImproving operating environment for international agencies in Eritrea.

Ms Kravetz’s oral report underlined that Eritrea failed to make any progress even in these few starting benchmarks. The Asmara authorities also continued to refuse her a single visit to Eritrea as they did for six years to the previous UN Special Rapporteur, Ms Sheila Keetharuth.

She also reported that the Eritrean regime is continuing its persecution of all faiths in Eritrea and confiscating their schools and health facilities. See full report on the interactive dialogue that followed her presentation:http://webtv.un.org/live/watch/id-sr-on ... 001/?term=

Twenty-one delegations of member states and four international NGOs made quick interventions at the interactive dialogue on Eritrea. The European Union and many other speakers saw “no sign of change” in the behavior of the Eritrean regime; Australia regretted that none of the 131 recommendations Eritrea promised to work on have been given a try; Vatican asked for dialogue with Eritrea and hoped the regime would stop the war against charities and Germany saw civil space continually narrowing in Eritrea. A number of speakers expressed their conviction that the renewal of the mandate of the Special Rapporteur for Human Rights for Eritrea is already a given fact.

Eritrea’s envoy, the usual Tesfamichael Gerhatu, presented his usual words of denial and was supported by the delegates of Venezuela, Cuba, Russia and China.

Ms Kravetz will present her full written report at the upcoming 44th Session of the Council in June this year which is expected review her mandate and highly probably extent it for another year.

https://www.harnnet.org/index.php/news- ... XU4hGBlgCY

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 36874
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Zmeselo » 28 Feb 2020, 23:46

Eritrea: Clarification on the Erroneous Assertions Made by Special Rapporteur Daniela Kravetz

27 Jun 2019


Eritrea expresses disappointment in the judgments and conclusions made by Special Rapporteur Daniela Kravetz on alleged “curtailment of Catholic Church activities”, without due regard to the legal basis in the provision of religious institutions in public social services.

BY ERITREA PERMANENT MISSION, GENEVA | PRESS RELEASE

http://www.shabait.com/categoryblog/288 ... ons-geneva

The Permanent Mission of the State of Eritrea to the United Nations and other International Organizations in Geneva wishes to provide clarification on the erroneous assertions made by the “Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Eritrea” in a News Release https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.i ... 914037.pdf issued on 21 June 2019.

The “Special Rapporteur” https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/SP/Co ... itrea.aspx alleges, among other things, the curtailment of Catholic Church activities in Eritrea.

Eritrea is a secular nation within a societal context of Christian, Islamic and other faiths which have co-existed peacefully for centuries. Christianity was introduced in 329 A.D. and Islam in 615 A.D.

The Eritrean people are not only pious practitioners of their respective faiths but all Eritrean cities, towns and village are notable, perhaps uniquely, as places where churches of various denominations (Orthodox, Catholic and Protestant) and mosques are found in proximity or juxtaposed to each other. (Asmara has one Synagogue serving literally a couple of Jewish families).

Based on this centuries old tradition and culture of tolerance, the right to belief has further been enshrined in Eritrea’s modern Civil and Penal Codes.

The country does not have an official religion, as is customary in various countries all over the world as well as our region.

None of the established religions have preferential or primary status within the framework of the secular Eritrean State.

This laudable climate of statutory equality of all religions has further been reinforced in recent years by additional regulations that spell out the distinct powers and functions of the State and the respective faiths.

Regulation 73/1995, enacted in 1995 after proper consultation between the government and the respective faiths, is a case in point. The regulation emphasizes the separation of powers and limits developmental activities of religious institutions to funding and monitoring in specific sectors identified by the Government (Article 6).

Religious institutions are not allowed to actually conduct developmental activities in areas of their choice as this is fraught with discrimination against non-adherents of the specific institution in question.

Religious institutions are not also allowed to solicit funds from external donors for the same considerations of equity and eschewing externally-induced imbalances. In this spirit, the funds that religious institutions allocate to developmental services must be raised from their local constituencies (Article 7).

The recent directive issued by the Ministry of Health to relevant religious institutions (mostly clinics run by Catholic Churches) constitutes implementation of Regulation 73/1995 in the instances where it had not been fully enforced in the past years.

The directive requests relevant religious institutions to transfer operational/administrative authority of clinics under their control to the respective regional branches of the Ministry of Health in full compliance of Regulation 73/1995.

The notion that this will negatively affect “or endanger” delivery of health services is far-fetched and simply not true. In the first place, the issue at hand is the mere transfer of operational modality.

More importantly, the wide network of Referral and Regional hospitals, clinics and health stations throughout the country are run by the Ministry of Health.

Health services in Eritrea – outpatient as well as inpatient – are heavily subsidized in accordance with the policy of social justice and have equitable spatial distribution. The commitment of the Eritrean Government to the provision and expansion of affordable and accessible healthcare to the population can be easily inferred from the substantial investments made in the past two decades to build and operate health facilities, including publicly-funded training of healthcare providers, and provision of medicaments at affordable prices.

This investment has resulted in more than 82% of the Eritrean population having access to medical facilities within 10 kilometers radius.

The stellar achievements of Eritrea in the health MDGs gives a glimpse of the enormous investment and tangible progress in the health security of its citizens. This is also attested by UN agencies (WHO and UNICEF in particular) that have various programs of cooperation with the Government in this sector.

The Permanent Mission of Eritrea expresses disappointment in the judgments and conclusions made in the Special Rapporteur’s Press Statement without due regard to the concrete situation on religion and religious harmony as well as the legal basis in the provision of religious institutions in public social services.

Furthermore, Eritrea finds it unacceptable the common pattern of making such pronouncements by a special rapporteur and other groups in a sensational way for political pressure and by timing it with the HRC Sessions.


Tog Wajale
Member
Posts: 4919
Joined: 23 Dec 2017, 07:23

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Tog Wajale » 29 Feb 2020, 01:34

Salih Gadi Johar ☆ Rapist / Child Molester ☆

Yes I Am Back From Ogaden Somali Bunker Gigiga, Diba Digu & Tog Wajale Villages & Most Of All Visiting The Famous Prison Cell Built Only For The Dedebit Woorgach Agga*me T.P.L.F Woyane Former Criminals Leaders. Especially The Prison Cell Most Decorated One Is ☆ Siye Abraha & Siyoum Mesfin ☆ Shure Enough They Will Be In That Prison Cell Built One By One No Matter Who Wins The Ethiopian Elections. Right After Election The Mighty Shaebia Eritrean Government/ People & Mighty Amara People, Mighty Oromo People Are Well Prepared Organized To Storm The Hiding Mekelle And Adwa Fancy Hotels And Apprehend The Dedebit Erkhusan Former Criminals Leaders One By One & Will Be Sent To Dahlak Island Prison. Rest Assured, Stay Tuned In August 2020 Unexpected Surprises In All Corners Of Tigrai Dry Land.

Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 29 Feb 2020, 03:06

:lol: :lol: :mrgreen: No, the Agame didn't say this
Please wait, video is loading...


Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 29 Feb 2020, 03:16

lol: :lol: :oops: :oops:
Please wait, video is loading...

Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 29 Feb 2020, 04:02

:lol: :lol: :mrgreen:
Wedi komarit medhin berad. Who says Samosonite these days? He must be living in the '70s.
:lol: :lol: :mrgreen:

Awash
Senior Member+
Posts: 30273
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 00:35

Re: Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules[

Post by Awash » 29 Feb 2020, 09:36

Canada mining firm accused of slavery abroad can be sued at home, supreme court rules

Case brought by three Eritreans against Nevsun Resources can continue as companies operating overseas face new legal risk

AFP in Ottawa

Fri 28 Feb 2020 17.14 EST
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... ts-slavery
Zmeselo wrote:
28 Feb 2020, 20:59
:lol:

The mine is now, in chinese hands (60%). This is b/n NEVSUN and the canadian courts. Nothing to do with Eritrea.

If it goes to court, we'll learn the identity of the accusers. That's the only plus.
(Courtesy of Merhawi G Kidane)

This should be interesting. They’re literally handicapping Canadian companies from competing against others abroad. The Chinese, Russians, Americans, etc now have a slight advantage over them in this regard.

At the end of the day, the new Chinese owner could simply just liquidate Nevsun and call it a day. At that point, don’t expect to get any sort of justice from Zijin in China.

Lastly, if I was the US President, I’d make a play to have Canadian companies domicile in the US because of this ruling.


Awash wrote:
28 Feb 2020, 20:28
The rule of law shall prevail
Nevsun can be sued in Canada for alleged human rights abuses, Supreme Court rules

Corporations can be civilly liable for international law breaches; act of state doctrine not a bar

“The Supreme Court showed a willingness to take seriously international human rights law,” says Cory Wanless.

By Elizabeth Raymer. 28 Feb 2020

A Canadian mining company that is a majority owner in a mine in Eritrea may be sued for alleged abuses that occurred in that country, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled on Friday.

The Court’s ruling holds that corporations can be held liable in civil law for breaches of international law, and that the act of state doctrine is not a bar to the claim.

The decision stands to have implications for Canadian companies with operations abroad, notably in the resources, technology and armaments sectors.


https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/pract ... les/326872



Post Reply