opmerc wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 16:29
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
Let's say it happened; does that justify what occurred in Amara state recently?
I didn't say it did. I pointed to your silence of previous attacks so you can see you are also guilty of the same selective outrage.
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
daniel kibret, the anti Muslim ''preacher'' or advisor, heard his speech complaining about ''muslim restaurants'' and etc, growing in number in gojjam and elsewhere, as a call for ''christians to defend their faith'' [an euphemism for: attack, attack
Adjectives aside, you are the one making those logical leaps without any evidence of a call to violence. If he made such calls that we don't know about, produce them and I will gladly ask that he be arrested and kept in a cell right next to Jawar.
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
I condemn any attacks on any innocents, regardless of their ethnicity, regardless of the ideology they adhere to, and I also condemn attacks on ANY religious institutions. I also believe most Oromos would too, seeing as how we're Muslims, Christians, etc, and have adherents of these religions in our families!
Sure except when it's perpertrated by your own kind then you conveniently decide it didn't happen. And if it did happen, it's somehow justified so there is no reason to condemn it. How convenient.
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
had you been on social media, you would've inevitably seen the pics
I have seen them. There was no evidence of their credibility and there were reports those were fabricated from another event. But nevermind guns, if those churches were found with tanks and massive explosives, any citizens job is to report that to the police and have them handle it, not to go burn a church. With how tribalist the Oromo police are, you would find no better allies in dealing with such things. The fact that you think such pictures justifies gangs burning a church with people inside of it speaks to how far you've departed from humanity.
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
that would destroy their own ethiopia they claim to love, so to do so, means somalia 1991 times 100
every oromo would stand with arms to defend oromia. somalis would do the same. afars. sidamas. welayta.
the odds would be stacked against the amara extremists for sure!!
Sure. And you would be victorious and your republic of Oromia would be born and it will live happily ever after.. Go stand in line next to Halafi with that nonsense.
Sadacha Macca wrote: ↑21 Dec 2019, 15:47
Now... will we see eskinder nega, berhanu nega, and co, condemn these attacks? Or will they remain silent, which implies approval of what occurred?
I am not their spokesperson, but they are allowed to evaluate the story in their own time with their own sources and respond to it. There is no timetable or rule that says just not responding means approval.
1] Why is that your first response, as opposed to condemning what occurred, and then making your point of ''selective outrage''?
Why is deflecting and changing the subject ENTIRELY your first response? It reeks of ulterior motives, if you ask me!
Your priorities show, by the way/the order in which you respond to such issues.
Your first thing to do, was to mention another atrocity, as opposed to first condemning what occurred, and then saying the rest.
2] I posted the video of daniel kibret, just look up on this very post. His complaining about ''muslim restaurants,'' and so on in gojjam, and etc, can be seen as and interpreted as being provocative, especially those already blinded by anti muslim sentiment, or by those harboring such mistrust and potential hatred]; it's like adding oil to a fire.
3] Is there any proof that oromos did those crimes that occurred recently, then? I have no problem condemning ANYONE for doing such things, whether they be oromo or not, but in a country where rumors spread like wild fires and impartial [or at least, those who try to be impartial] news/media outlets do not exist; I refuse to just take the amara elitists and their cadres, ''words for it!''
You seem to be convinced that oromos were perpetrators, and the sole perpetrators of the violence, [as opposed to it being a [deleted] for tat violent attack, i.e. ezema goons attacking oromos, then oromos responding in-kind, basically it's not the same situation-this situation is clearly one sided, muslims having their mosques, businesses and etc, burnt, and you saying ''oh it's just buildings, no worries!'' as opposed to being concerned by what these acts imply, and the possible reverberations, etc]
4] Never said burning churches was acceptable, but if a church is being used to stage military operations against otherwise UNARMED OROMOS, then yes, those churches should be closed/handed to authorities.
tribal police exist all over the country, to point out oromia only, while ignoring let's say those of the amaras who were massacring qemants/agews, and then oromo students more recently; shows you too, are very biased, kind sir.
5. Yes, those opposed to a resurgence of the same elitist mentalities/ideologies, that made ethiopia the poorest country on earth, and other things, would win, but it'd be destructive and no one would benefit from such a thing.
and i will agree with that last point, but the silence is deafening and non-conducive, so we'll give them what, a year or so, to see their response then, eshi? tole?