Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.
Re: በላቲን ከፃፍን እንግሊዝኛን በፍጥነት እንማራለን!
My theory is that it is likely that the Chinese language develops better if it continues to use the script that was invented for it.
Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.
Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.
Re: በላቲን ከፃፍን እንግሊዝኛን በፍጥነት እንማራለን!
Read my note. The answer you looking for is there.Naga Tuma wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 22:59My theory is that it is likely that the Chinese language develops better if it continues to use the script that was invented for it.
Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.
Re: በላቲን ከፃፍን እንግሊዝኛን በፍጥነት እንማራለን!
I have read your note.
My theory is outside your note. If you would, please read it closely and carefully one more time.
To give you the benefit of the doubt about your note, it boils down to two things:
1. A premise that “a language can be written in any symbols or scripts or letters.”
2. A premise that “the adoption of an existing script or modifying it or totally rejecting it and adopting another or creating a new one from scratch has always been a choice to further political identity.”
Therefore, on the one hand, you argue that there is practically no problem to use any symbols or scripts or letters to write a language or any language.
On the other hand, you argue that the choice of symbols or scripts or letters has been a choice to further political identity.
Correct?
My theory is outside your note. If you would, please read it closely and carefully one more time.
To give you the benefit of the doubt about your note, it boils down to two things:
1. A premise that “a language can be written in any symbols or scripts or letters.”
2. A premise that “the adoption of an existing script or modifying it or totally rejecting it and adopting another or creating a new one from scratch has always been a choice to further political identity.”
Therefore, on the one hand, you argue that there is practically no problem to use any symbols or scripts or letters to write a language or any language.
On the other hand, you argue that the choice of symbols or scripts or letters has been a choice to further political identity.
Correct?
Dama wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 23:01Read my note. The answer you looking for is there.Naga Tuma wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 22:59My theory is that it is likely that the Chinese language develops better if it continues to use the script that was invented for it.
Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.
-
ethiopianunity
- Senior Member
- Posts: 10684
- Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 17:38
Re: በላቲን ከፃፍን እንግሊዝኛን በፍጥነት እንማራለን!
I used to love watching English News by Lulseged Kumsa. His English reading is impeccable ! He probably was sent to be educated by Ase H Selassie.
Look, English is hard and requires real education. Eprdf 2 aka pp is displaying, it is better to embarrass the country with poor English language than affect their ego speaking broken English when they don't have to until they are comfortable! Apparently it is showing their leadership as a joke, they are experimenting with English in the middle of conducting serious national or international affairs. That is what it looks like. They have more options to address foreign delegates: either read in Amharic as the national language ( l sense Olf may not allow them!) and have it translated like it happens at UN conference or, have others with English expertise to represent them!
Re: በላቲን ከፃፍን እንግሊዝኛን በፍጥነት እንማራለን!
You did not understand it. May be you skipped it.Naga Tuma wrote: ↑31 Dec 2025, 00:00I have read your note.
My theory is outside your note. If you would, please read it closely and carefully one more time.
To give you the benefit of the doubt about your note, it boils down to two things:
1. A premise that “a language can be written in any symbols or scripts or letters.”
2. A premise that “the adoption of an existing script or modifying it or totally rejecting it and adopting another or creating a new one from scratch has always been a choice to further political identity.”
Therefore, on the one hand, you argue that there is practically no problem to use any symbols or scripts or letters to write a language or any language.
On the other hand, you argue that the choice of symbols or scripts or letters has been a choice to further political identity.
Correct?
Dama wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 23:01Read my note. The answer you looking for is there.Naga Tuma wrote: ↑30 Dec 2025, 22:59My theory is that it is likely that the Chinese language develops better if it continues to use the script that was invented for it.
Do you agree or disagree?
A simple agree or disagree answer would be a sufficient answer. If you don’t know, responding that you don’t know would also be a sufficient answer.