Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Assegid S.
Member
Posts: 950
Joined: 11 Aug 2013, 07:11
Contact:

Re: White House concerned over Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement

Post by Assegid S. » 20 Jan 2024, 13:44

Revelations wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:52
Oy! I didn't know you can twists facts so much! What you summed up here is not even close enough to what I have been presenting in this thread. And you till trying to push EBC to me as if what is presented in global media has missed the mark. Good to know this side of you! Have a good day! :oops: :lol:

Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:04
Hello Revelations; everything is clear 8) I commented on the term from the context of general diplomatic correspondences; and you didn't buy it as the concern from the perspective of security threat (from Al Shaabab) is genuine. I agree on that and it is my concern too.

Not only on that, I share your view that Ethiopia's state controlled media are not trustworthy too. However; it's really good to listen them to know their way of thinking and explanation of political events based on the directives from the top seats. Yet, regarding the issue we were talking, I believed there was no other suitable media to refer than EBC. It is like listening from the horse's mouth. The information that the national security advisor 'admitted' should have been denied. Because; rather than putting point / value on their diplomatic engagement, it taints the state as spineless / slave to move on its own.

Have a great Ethiopian Epiphany 8)
Hello again Revelations 8) I really don't know WHICH facts and HOW I twisted. I just commented based on your posts in this thread:
(CN) — The White House said Tuesday that it opposes an agreement between Ethiopia and a breakaway region of Somalia, raising concerns the deal could lead to instability and hinder international counterterrorism efforts.
I will not use EBC as a source of credible information in this matter. Hence why I didn't watch the videos you provided.
These two are the main concepts that I replied to. Otherwise; I have no intention to distort or twist any fact. That is not me really.

Have a good day too, Brother Revelations 8)

Revelations
Senior Member+
Posts: 34573
Joined: 06 Jan 2007, 15:44

Re: White House concerned over Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement

Post by Revelations » 20 Jan 2024, 14:00

Oy! Oy! When someone thinks they can pull a fast one on you! :lol: So many points with supporting docs presented and you want to only use one that fits your agenda? And yes, this is you, ato Assegid S. :lol:
Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 13:44
Revelations wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:52
Oy! I didn't know you can twists facts so much! What you summed up here is not even close enough to what I have been presenting in this thread. And you till trying to push EBC to me as if what is presented in global media has missed the mark. Good to know this side of you! Have a good day! :oops: :lol:

Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:04
Hello Revelations; everything is clear 8) I commented on the term from the context of general diplomatic correspondences; and you didn't buy it as the concern from the perspective of security threat (from Al Shaabab) is genuine. I agree on that and it is my concern too.

Not only on that, I share your view that Ethiopia's state controlled media are not trustworthy too. However; it's really good to listen them to know their way of thinking and explanation of political events based on the directives from the top seats. Yet, regarding the issue we were talking, I believed there was no other suitable media to refer than EBC. It is like listening from the horse's mouth. The information that the national security advisor 'admitted' should have been denied. Because; rather than putting point / value on their diplomatic engagement, it taints the state as spineless / slave to move on its own.

Have a great Ethiopian Epiphany 8)
Hello again Revelations 8) I really don't know WHICH facts and HOW I twisted. I just commented based on your posts in this thread:
(CN) — The White House said Tuesday that it opposes an agreement between Ethiopia and a breakaway region of Somalia, raising concerns the deal could lead to instability and hinder international counterterrorism efforts.
I will not use EBC as a source of credible information in this matter. Hence why I didn't watch the videos you provided.
These two are the main concepts that I replied to. Otherwise; I have no intention to distort or twist any fact. That is not me really.

Have a good day too, Brother Revelations 8)

Assegid S.
Member
Posts: 950
Joined: 11 Aug 2013, 07:11
Contact:

Re: White House concerned over Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement

Post by Assegid S. » 20 Jan 2024, 14:12

Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 13:44
Revelations wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:52
Oy! I didn't know you can twists facts so much! What you summed up here is not even close enough to what I have been presenting in this thread. And you till trying to push EBC to me as if what is presented in global media has missed the mark. Good to know this side of you! Have a good day! :oops: :lol:

Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:04
Hello Revelations; everything is clear 8) I commented on the term from the context of general diplomatic correspondences; and you didn't buy it as the concern from the perspective of security threat (from Al Shaabab) is genuine. I agree on that and it is my concern too.

Not only on that, I share your view that Ethiopia's state controlled media are not trustworthy too. However; it's really good to listen them to know their way of thinking and explanation of political events based on the directives from the top seats. Yet, regarding the issue we were talking, I believed there was no other suitable media to refer than EBC. It is like listening from the horse's mouth. The information that the national security advisor 'admitted' should have been denied. Because; rather than putting point / value on their diplomatic engagement, it taints the state as spineless / slave to move on its own.

Have a great Ethiopian Epiphany 8)
Hello again Revelations 8) I really don't know WHICH facts and HOW I twisted. I just commented based on your posts in this thread:
(CN) — The White House said Tuesday that it opposes an agreement between Ethiopia and a breakaway region of Somalia, raising concerns the deal could lead to instability and hinder international counterterrorism efforts.
I will not use EBC as a source of credible information in this matter. Hence why I didn't watch the videos you provided.
These two are the main concepts that I replied to. Otherwise; I have no intention to distort or twist any fact. That is not me really.

Have a good day too, Brother Revelations 8)
Hahahaha I go along with the rest of the thoughts in the doc, Brother Revelations. I don't know ... honestly, I'm reading your conversation with Sarcasm and laughing alone 8) May be ... better if I try some other day 8)

Stay safe Brother, Revelations 8)

Revelations
Senior Member+
Posts: 34573
Joined: 06 Jan 2007, 15:44

Re: White House concerned over Ethiopia-Somaliland agreement

Post by Revelations » 20 Jan 2024, 14:15

Oy! Oy! When someone thinks they can pull a fast one on you! :lol: So many points with supporting docs presented and you want to only use one that fits your agenda? And yes, this is you, ato Assegid S. :lol:
Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 13:44
Revelations wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:52
Oy! I didn't know you can twists facts so much! What you summed up here is not even close enough to what I have been presenting in this thread. And you till trying to push EBC to me as if what is presented in global media has missed the mark. Good to know this side of you! Have a good day! :oops: :lol:

Assegid S. wrote:
20 Jan 2024, 12:04
Hello Revelations; everything is clear 8) I commented on the term from the context of general diplomatic correspondences; and you didn't buy it as the concern from the perspective of security threat (from Al Shaabab) is genuine. I agree on that and it is my concern too.

Not only on that, I share your view that Ethiopia's state controlled media are not trustworthy too. However; it's really good to listen them to know their way of thinking and explanation of political events based on the directives from the top seats. Yet, regarding the issue we were talking, I believed there was no other suitable media to refer than EBC. It is like listening from the horse's mouth. The information that the national security advisor 'admitted' should have been denied. Because; rather than putting point / value on their diplomatic engagement, it taints the state as spineless / slave to move on its own.

Have a great Ethiopian Epiphany 8)
Hello again Revelations 8) I really don't know WHICH facts and HOW I twisted. I just commented based on your posts in this thread:
(CN) — The White House said Tuesday that it opposes an agreement between Ethiopia and a breakaway region of Somalia, raising concerns the deal could lead to instability and hinder international counterterrorism efforts.
I will not use EBC as a source of credible information in this matter. Hence why I didn't watch the videos you provided.
These two are the main concepts that I replied to. Otherwise; I have no intention to distort or twist any fact. That is not me really.

Have a good day too, Brother Revelations 8)

Post Reply