Mereja.Forum

[Revelations]

Please wait, video is loading...

[sun]

The Centeral gov is shaky because its power is divided among Kilillis. The Kilil gov power is hijacked by extremists and power seeking primitives. No one controls over the primitive in each Kilili, so that they can do whatever they want to do. I doubt if either some Primitive TPLF officials or some extreme wing blind Eskinder Nega and ABN/Asaminew Tsige followers have no part in this Barbarism

The assumption is very close to the reality on the ground since the Eskinder and ABN/Asaminew have already promised barbaric attacks and then went on to implement its promises. They are just parochial red neck chauvinist hydra with one body but having many heads for the purpose of fooling the innocents and the hard working democratic population seeking to coexists in peace and through that prosper together. When the time is unstable and shaky it is important that the central government should have more power and more strength for the purpose of promoting security and peace while slowly but surely giving more and more power to the killils according to needs as security and peace comes to be stable and reliable.

To be powerful for the killils is not an end in itself by itself alone but needs to be a thing that leads to some thing with good ends. There is great differences between the democratic and Laissez-faire mode of governance.

Laissez-faire leadership
Laissez-faire leadership allows group members total freedom. Laissez-faire leaders do not participate in the decision-making process, and rarely offer opinions. This style can work well if the group is highly motivated and competent. However, laissez-faire leadership has many drawbacks. Without the leader’s input, the group can sink into conflict as members jockey over roles and responsibilities. In addition, deliberations may continue for far too long. Finally, by not weighing in on the process, the leader forfeits control of the final product. In Lewin’s study, the children under laissez-faire leadership were the least productive and the most argumentative.

Democratic leadership
Democratic leadership balances decision-making responsibility between the group and the leader. Democratic leaders actively participate in discussions, but also make sure to listen to the views of others. This style often leads to positive, inclusive, and collaborative work environments. Furthermore, a good democratic leader can bring out the group’s creativity. Under this style, the leader still retains final responsibility for the group’s decision. In Lewin’s study, the children under democratic leadership made the highest quality contributions.
General Dwight Eisenhower and Nelson Mandela are taken to be examples of successful democratic leaders. During WWII, Ike was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. While that title might seem to imply unlimited authority, he worked extremely hard to hold together a diverse coalition. Powerful Allied politicians often had conflicting goals and strong ideas about military plans. Ike made these men feel heard even when their views were unrealistic. Ike also preferred discussing issues with his staff rather than simply barking orders. Never afraid to take blame, he once said, “leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well.

Mandela displayed a democratic leadership style during his long fight for equality. As a leader of the African National Congress (ANC) he believed that people of all colors and political affiliations could contribute to the movement. After nearly three decades in prison, Mandela was released, and the ANC won South Africa’s first free election. When he became president, Mandela could have sought revenge on his former oppressors. Instead, in an exceptional act of forgiveness and reconciliation, he included them in his government. His decision greatly accelerated the national healing process in South Africa.

[Revelations]

Please wait, video is loading...