eritrea’s “sacred truths” was argued here: sacred truths
Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin” was argued here: eternal sin
Both are based on information in the same source.
Both can’t be true at the same time.
So, who got it wrong?
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
I have yet to find a single Ethiopian or Eritrean literate person who feels responsible to responds to his own terms in light of new realizations.
Many months give you a long enough time to test and validate your own terms and ask yourself how they can possibly resonate with new realizations since then.
This is how a rational and scientific discourse progresses with time.
This kind of discourse might even help you uncover a possibility that Jesus as a Messiah might have been a premature contemplation and meditation.
Staying stagnant means you are not leading the discourse but waiting to react to others trying to make the discourse continue.
Many months give you a long enough time to test and validate your own terms and ask yourself how they can possibly resonate with new realizations since then.
This is how a rational and scientific discourse progresses with time.
This kind of discourse might even help you uncover a possibility that Jesus as a Messiah might have been a premature contemplation and meditation.
Staying stagnant means you are not leading the discourse but waiting to react to others trying to make the discourse continue.
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
The missing in discussion eritrea, while thinking about the Prophets, the earliest monotheist of them all being the ancient Ethiopian Pharaoh Akhenaten, according to at least two authors, I remembered what yourself wrote as what Jesus declared.“eritrea” wrote: As Jesus Himself declared, "Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them"
1. Do you agree or disagree that Pharaoh Akhenaten was also a Prophet?
2. If you agree that he was also a Prophet, have you ever read his name in the Old or New Testament?
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
In a rational discourse, if it is established that Pharaoh Akhenaten was also a Prophet and that Jesus also talked about the laws of the Prophets, Jesus himself implied that he was also another Prophet.
That would line him among them starting with Prophet Akhenaten before The Exodus or Prophet Moses after The Exodus, Prophet Mani, Prophet Mohammed, and Prophet Balam.
In a historical context, uncovering Goddess Athena led to a rebirth of the ancient civilization of her era or the first Renaissance.
Similarly, uncovering Pharaoh Akhenaten as a Prophet before The Exodus would invite for a call for a rebirth of the ancient civilization of his era or the second Renaissance.
That would line him among them starting with Prophet Akhenaten before The Exodus or Prophet Moses after The Exodus, Prophet Mani, Prophet Mohammed, and Prophet Balam.
In a historical context, uncovering Goddess Athena led to a rebirth of the ancient civilization of her era or the first Renaissance.
Similarly, uncovering Pharaoh Akhenaten as a Prophet before The Exodus would invite for a call for a rebirth of the ancient civilization of his era or the second Renaissance.
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
Ancient Ethiopians, specifically ancient Axumites, are the only people I read about who were told that they “ARE CURSED BY THE WILL OF GOD.”
Arguably, ancient Ethiopians had the earliest known monotheist Prophet by the name Pharaoh Akhenaten.
According to two authors, the earliest known Ethiopian Prophet left ancient Ethiopia on Exodus.
The sequence would be becoming a monotheist Prophet, Exodus, and hearing “CURSED BY THE WILL OF GOD.”
Arguably, ancient Ethiopians had the earliest known monotheist Prophet by the name Pharaoh Akhenaten.
According to two authors, the earliest known Ethiopian Prophet left ancient Ethiopia on Exodus.
The sequence would be becoming a monotheist Prophet, Exodus, and hearing “CURSED BY THE WILL OF GOD.”
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
If this long history about faith in our region starting before The Exodus is substantiated, any sane faculty would and should argue that it has been a colossal story.
Any sane faculty would and should argue that it would be colossal not to amend it for eternity.
Any sound faculty would and could bear on ancient times when traveling and communicating was so difficult that another Prophet could be easily mistaken as different from one in order to amend it.
In this Age of Enlightenment among humankind, religion has become very overrated.
Christianity is the only insanity that would have its followers believe that a lady gave birth to a man without a sperm under the seeds breeding sun.
Its amendment would allow incorporating divine revelations of this era on a global scale instead of continuing to bear on ancient revelations among ancient Israelite tribesmen as a focal point.
I started discussing about this topic more than 19 years ago before I joined this forum.
That was when I started to search for literate Ethiopians and Eritreans to responsibly engage in the discussion of a topic of this magnitude.
Instead of doing research about it and engaging in a topic of this magnitude, some chose to continuously furl the pejorative terms Galla and Pagan.
Any sane faculty would and should argue that it would be colossal not to amend it for eternity.
Any sound faculty would and could bear on ancient times when traveling and communicating was so difficult that another Prophet could be easily mistaken as different from one in order to amend it.
In this Age of Enlightenment among humankind, religion has become very overrated.
Christianity is the only insanity that would have its followers believe that a lady gave birth to a man without a sperm under the seeds breeding sun.
Its amendment would allow incorporating divine revelations of this era on a global scale instead of continuing to bear on ancient revelations among ancient Israelite tribesmen as a focal point.
I started discussing about this topic more than 19 years ago before I joined this forum.
That was when I started to search for literate Ethiopians and Eritreans to responsibly engage in the discussion of a topic of this magnitude.
Instead of doing research about it and engaging in a topic of this magnitude, some chose to continuously furl the pejorative terms Galla and Pagan.
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
A divine revelation is a revered matter to express verbally or in writing.
Having said that, I seriously believe that I have deciphered Holy Spirit. I consider it my best observation yet.
I theorize that Holy Spirit is as alive and as present as Gravity and Photosynthesis in plants.
It is very hard for me to know instances of divine revelations in this era on a global scale, which no known science can conclusively explain.
I have recently shared one instance of mine that I don’t think anyone from Washington, D.C., or New York to Being or Tokyo, from Moscow to Cape Town or Buenos Aires can explain based on any known science.
Here is a link to it:
Why I think that humanity should take my brief dream of May 18, 2026, as a bombshell in the history of faith
Having said that, I seriously believe that I have deciphered Holy Spirit. I consider it my best observation yet.
I theorize that Holy Spirit is as alive and as present as Gravity and Photosynthesis in plants.
It is very hard for me to know instances of divine revelations in this era on a global scale, which no known science can conclusively explain.
I have recently shared one instance of mine that I don’t think anyone from Washington, D.C., or New York to Being or Tokyo, from Moscow to Cape Town or Buenos Aires can explain based on any known science.
Here is a link to it:
Why I think that humanity should take my brief dream of May 18, 2026, as a bombshell in the history of faith
Re: Divine matters: eritrea’s “sacred truths” versus Naga Tuma’s “eternal sin.” Who got it wrong?
Conclusively deciphering something exists doesn’t come easily.
Expressing that something doesn’t come easily is now a déjà vu for me.
The global population is large enough to mobilize to study instances of conclusive divine revelations of this era and amend the eternal sin for generations to come instead of running over it by a brittle diabolical order.
A conclusive study would allow every child of the world be introduced to the global scale revelations for generations to come instead of making ancient stories of ancient Israelite tribesmen a focal point for eternity.
I have written a few times on this forum that spiritual leaders of the world have been primed for another council to debate to conclusion the mysterious happenstances of this era.
In a scientific sense, I have come to imagine if Holy Spirit, Photosynthesis in plants, and Gravity are the three pillars of our planet that anchor it in the known universe.
Expressing that something doesn’t come easily is now a déjà vu for me.
The global population is large enough to mobilize to study instances of conclusive divine revelations of this era and amend the eternal sin for generations to come instead of running over it by a brittle diabolical order.
A conclusive study would allow every child of the world be introduced to the global scale revelations for generations to come instead of making ancient stories of ancient Israelite tribesmen a focal point for eternity.
I have written a few times on this forum that spiritual leaders of the world have been primed for another council to debate to conclusion the mysterious happenstances of this era.
In a scientific sense, I have come to imagine if Holy Spirit, Photosynthesis in plants, and Gravity are the three pillars of our planet that anchor it in the known universe.