Arguably, humanity’s struggle about faith may have been its longest and most challenging of all of its struggles.
Even though faith institutions provide social services, their dogmatic shortcomings have been prevalent throughout history.
Written history suggests that the struggle for monotheism preceded The Exodus.
While the scriptures authored after The Exodus preach about monotheism, they were authored to condemn the earliest known monotheist African Pharaoh instead of praising him for pioneering it. Whether his vision was divine or not is another question.
The question cannot negate the writing that the pioneer of monotheism was a sinner was sinful.
Paradoxically, an arguably exhaustive history that the father of the Torah was an African Pharaoh was published in Germany in 1939, which was during the holocaust in Europe.
Prudence would suggest that the exhaustive history would immediately be proven wrong or the sin of misrepresentation in the scriptures for so many centuries would be repented and corrected.
The books of faith in which a sin of misrepresentation of such a magnitude have been carried and received as holy even after the publication of that reveling history book.
Enlightenment movements that uncovered pre-Christian Gods and Goddesses of ancient Greece and later on the Pharaohs of ancient Egypt and Ethiopia have faced challenges from non other than the proponents of the scriptures that have the sin of misrepresentation buried inside them.
Renaissance men of both eras have endured challenges against them. The sin of misrepresentation was hindrance against them.
Evidently, the students of the first Renaissance that authored a constitution consciously highlighted promoting the progress of science and distanced themselves from promoting or abrogating the free exercise of faith.
In ancient times, including during the Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D., humanity was far less connected than it is today.
We are now in an era when humanity is globally connected at the geostationary orbit. Yet, a book of ancient scriptures in which the sin of misrepresentation remains uncorrected is carried and received as holy.
Eternal shame henceforth on those who pass or receive the sin of misrepresentation in the scriptures as holy.
Re: The eternal sin
I have shared part of the following opinion several times on this forum.
Granted that the exhaustive history that Prophet Moses was Pharaoh Akhenaten who pioneered monotheism before The Exodus is substantive, ancient Ethiopia and ancient Israel had a mutual prophet.
In figurative terms, the mysterious happenstances of this era that I gather indicate that the ancient Prophets of Ethiopia and Persia are risen.
The Council of Nicaea of 325 A.D. has been judged in two different eras that it consists of sins. Renaissance men of both eras didn’t have to endure so much in order to point out the sins in the old Book dubbed holy.
All these and more point to the calls I have made multiple times on this forum that spiritual leaders of the world of this era have been primed for another council to debate to conclusion the mysterious happenstances of this era.
Granted that the exhaustive history that Prophet Moses was Pharaoh Akhenaten who pioneered monotheism before The Exodus is substantive, ancient Ethiopia and ancient Israel had a mutual prophet.
In figurative terms, the mysterious happenstances of this era that I gather indicate that the ancient Prophets of Ethiopia and Persia are risen.
The Council of Nicaea of 325 A.D. has been judged in two different eras that it consists of sins. Renaissance men of both eras didn’t have to endure so much in order to point out the sins in the old Book dubbed holy.
All these and more point to the calls I have made multiple times on this forum that spiritual leaders of the world of this era have been primed for another council to debate to conclusion the mysterious happenstances of this era.