Post
by Zack » 15 Mar 2025, 21:50
Dark Energy dear lad , you short legged Shabians” seem to have a recurring tendency to complicate matters for yourselves. why dear lad One must wonder why did you not dissolve Ethiopia entirely in 1991 when you had the chance golden opportunity ? And yet, nearly three decades later, you found yourselves engaged in conflict with Tigray in 2020 and in 1998. What was the ultimate objective? Was it to facilitate the consolidation of power by the so called Galla monster? Do you not see the fundamental reality? The Agame, the Galla, and the Amhara are not your allies, nor do they harbour any genuine goodwill towards you.
You may place your faith in international law and the supposed protection of the international community. From a legal standpoint and perspective , such mechanisms offer a theoretical shield only, but in practical terms, they are only as effective as the military forces capable of upholding them boots on the groun dear lad . International law, in the absence of power to enforce it, is as worthless as toilet paper . These legal frameworks were constructed in the aftermath of the Second World War, ostensibly to prevent further territorial aggression. Yet, history has demonstrated time and again that nations continue to wage war over land and resources, irrespective of international conventions and laws .
Consider the case of Paul Kagame the rwandan dictator and his incursions into the Democratic Republic of the Congo. His forces have penetrated deep into what is internationally recognised as Congolese territory, with the apparent ambition of annexing entire regions and steal their resources . Rwanda’s involvement in the DRC has been framed as a security necessity, a response to alleged threats emanating from Congolese territory, yet in reality, it is a strategic conquest aimed at economic and geopolitical gain. The international community, bound by its own inertia and vested interests, largely turns a blind eye to such transgressions, demonstrating the limits of international law when confronted with realpolitik indeed.
furthermore , one need only look at the Saudi and Emirati intervention in Yemen a catastrophe . Under the pretext of defending the internationally recognised Yemeni government sure , they have subjected the country to relentless bombardment they bombed it back to the stone age people are starving to death , reducing vast swathes of it to rubble and plunging its people into one of the worst humanitarian crises of modern times. The consent of the Yemeni people was neither sought nor required; strategic interests dictated the course of action, and military might ensured its execution international law who cares the strong dictate to give a few example .
The lesson to be learned from all of this is clear rhetoric and legal pronouncements hold no real weight unless they are backed by the power to enforce them. The security of a nation is not safeguarded by treaties or resolutions but by the men who stand ready to defend it. In the end, it is the boots on the ground your army, however it may be disparaged that will determine the fate of your land. Keep both feet firmly planted in reality on the ground , for history has shown that survival belongs to those who are willing and able to defend what is theirs the best defense is to attack your enemies . so dear lad protect your land with your short legged shabian army indeed.
Dr Zackovich