Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
TGAA
Member+
Posts: 5747
Joined: 07 Apr 2019, 20:34

The critical mass of Fano

Post by TGAA » 09 Sep 2024, 22:37

When Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed decided to focus on disarming only the Amhara people, he had already formed a set of assumptions about them. These assumptions led to a shift in his perception—from respect to contempt. His latest speech in Wellega a good indicator of that contempt. This contempt, in turn, drew him into the political quagmire he finds himself in today. Unfortunately for him, his political future now hinges on the outcome of the conflict he has initiated with the Amharas willingly .

The first assumption was based on the group of Amhara elites, often referred to as the "BADEN serviles," who seemed to have no clue how to represented the broader Amhara population. Abiy and his close ally, Shimelis, seemed to believe that they could allow the mass slaughter of Amharas in Oromia, and yet, upon their arrival in Bahir Dar, they would be ceremoniously welcomed with honorary gifts such as the traditional "Kaba" garment—not just once, but every time they returned. This delusion of praise ignored the deep grievances of the Amhara people.

The second group that influenced Abiy's miscalculations were the so-called "belly dancers" or "Addis smoothers"—individuals who, despite the mass evictions and destruction of homes affecting hundreds of thousands of Addis Ababa residents by Shimelis and Adanech, continued to heap praise upon Abiy. Their sycophancy blinded him to the real sentiment brewing in Amhara regions.

After the war with the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) subsided, Abiy identified the Amhara people as the next threat that needed to be neutralized. With the support of the BADEN , he pursued a campaign aimed solely at disarming the Amharas. Although the Amhara people are deeply religious and hold authority in high regard, believing that power is divinely granted, they were not naïve enough to sign away their existence to a leader they perceived as a genocidal maniac, one who seemed to take pleasure in the suffering and deaths of their kin.

Now, the Amharas find themselves fighting a war for survival, one that will not end until the existential threat they face is eliminated. A year into this struggle, the question remains: where does the Amhara fight for survival stand today? A Sobering reality born out of wicked assumption Abiy and his stooges have to contend with.

Dama
Member+
Posts: 6455
Joined: 22 Jun 2024, 21:05

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by Dama » 09 Sep 2024, 22:48

TGAA wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 22:37
When Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed decided to focus on disarming only the Amhara people, he had already formed a set of assumptions about them. These assumptions led to a shift in his perception—from respect to contempt. His latest speech in Wellega a good indicator of that contempt. This contempt, in turn, drew him into the political quagmire he finds himself in today. Unfortunately for him, his political future now hinges on the outcome of the conflict he has initiated with the Amharas willingly .

The first assumption was based on the group of Amhara elites, often referred to as the "BADEN serviles," who seemed to have no clue how to represented the broader Amhara population. Abiy and his close ally, Shimelis, seemed to believe that they could allow the mass slaughter of Amharas in Oromia, and yet, upon their arrival in Bahir Dar, they would be ceremoniously welcomed with honorary gifts such as the traditional "Kaba" garment—not just once, but every time they returned. This delusion of praise ignored the deep grievances of the Amhara people.

The second group that influenced Abiy's miscalculations were the so-called "belly dancers" or "Addis smoothers"—individuals who, despite the mass evictions and destruction of homes affecting hundreds of thousands of Addis Ababa residents by Shimelis and Adanech, continued to heap praise upon Abiy. Their sycophancy blinded him to the real sentiment brewing in Amhara regions.

After the war with the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) subsided, Abiy identified the Amhara people as the next threat that needed to be neutralized. With the support of the BADEN , he pursued a campaign aimed solely at disarming the Amharas. Although the Amhara people are deeply religious and hold authority in high regard, believing that power is divinely granted, they were not naïve enough to sign away their existence to a leader they perceived as a genocidal maniac, one who seemed to take pleasure in the suffering and deaths of their kin.

Now, the Amharas find themselves fighting a war for survival, one that will not end until the existential threat they face is eliminated. A year into this struggle, the question remains: where does the Amhara fight for survival stand today? A Sobering reality born out of wicked assumption Abiy and his stooges have to contend with.
I really have trouble getting your thesis. Body of information or evidences to support your assertion.
And then your conclusion.

Please if you can rewrite your post, I would appreciate it.

Misraq
Senior Member
Posts: 16692
Joined: 27 Sep 2009, 19:43
Location: Zemunda

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by Misraq » 09 Sep 2024, 23:09

TGAA, good luck with your unionist ideology. The below response is from a Gurage who was pocked lately to come out of his shell. The amhara people have been bitten by snakes who they don't suspect for decades. It is due to this fact that we push snakes out deliberately. Easier to manage them that way.
Dama wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 22:48
TGAA wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 22:37
When Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed decided to focus on disarming only the Amhara people, he had already formed a set of assumptions about them. These assumptions led to a shift in his perception—from respect to contempt. His latest speech in Wellega a good indicator of that contempt. This contempt, in turn, drew him into the political quagmire he finds himself in today. Unfortunately for him, his political future now hinges on the outcome of the conflict he has initiated with the Amharas willingly .

The first assumption was based on the group of Amhara elites, often referred to as the "BADEN serviles," who seemed to have no clue how to represented the broader Amhara population. Abiy and his close ally, Shimelis, seemed to believe that they could allow the mass slaughter of Amharas in Oromia, and yet, upon their arrival in Bahir Dar, they would be ceremoniously welcomed with honorary gifts such as the traditional "Kaba" garment—not just once, but every time they returned. This delusion of praise ignored the deep grievances of the Amhara people.

The second group that influenced Abiy's miscalculations were the so-called "belly dancers" or "Addis smoothers"—individuals who, despite the mass evictions and destruction of homes affecting hundreds of thousands of Addis Ababa residents by Shimelis and Adanech, continued to heap praise upon Abiy. Their sycophancy blinded him to the real sentiment brewing in Amhara regions.

After the war with the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) subsided, Abiy identified the Amhara people as the next threat that needed to be neutralized. With the support of the BADEN , he pursued a campaign aimed solely at disarming the Amharas. Although the Amhara people are deeply religious and hold authority in high regard, believing that power is divinely granted, they were not naïve enough to sign away their existence to a leader they perceived as a genocidal maniac, one who seemed to take pleasure in the suffering and deaths of their kin.

Now, the Amharas find themselves fighting a war for survival, one that will not end until the existential threat they face is eliminated. A year into this struggle, the question remains: where does the Amhara fight for survival stand today? A Sobering reality born out of wicked assumption Abiy and his stooges have to contend with.
I really have trouble getting your thesis. Body of information or evidences to support your assertion.
And then your conclusion.

Please if you can rewrite your post, I would appreciate it.

Odie
Member+
Posts: 6216
Joined: 24 Jun 2024, 23:07

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by Odie » 10 Sep 2024, 07:42

Misraq,
It looks you were up all-night reciting Gurage....Gurage.... :lol: :lol:
Gurage has done nothing to Amhara or any other ethnic in the country. The Gurage have their own problem to solve. Individual Gurages posting in this form have a right to express their feeling the way they wish based on rules as any other forum member. Some answers are directed against your or your pal's negative response to the posters who post as Gurage. Some posters may pretend as a Gurage. No one knows how many of you guys are even real Ethiopians who divide and ignite fire in the forum. Some have divisive foreign agenda. In any case, I hope you don't expect people to pay you a standing ovation for everything you say, or everything said about Amhara. You are a tribalist advocating for Amhara country in which case I personally don't see you any different from other ethno-fascist preachers. You are telling use your Fano is an ethno-fascist superior to every other ethnic and working to secede... killing everybody on its way. So far, we have not heard this from the horse's mouth, but this is the alternative fact from you and from your pal. In that case, again, no one is going to calp you but condemn you like OLA/TPLF/OLF/PP/EPRDF complex. You won't get a free pass.

Dama
Member+
Posts: 6455
Joined: 22 Jun 2024, 21:05

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by Dama » 10 Sep 2024, 08:02

Misraq wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 23:09
TGAA, good luck with your unionist ideology. The below response is from a Gurage who was pocked lately to come out of his shell. The amhara people have been bitten by snakes who they don't suspect for decades. It is due to this fact that we push snakes out deliberately. Easier to manage them that way.
Dama wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 22:48
TGAA wrote:
09 Sep 2024, 22:37
When Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed decided to focus on disarming only the Amhara people, he had already formed a set of assumptions about them. These assumptions led to a shift in his perception—from respect to contempt. His latest speech in Wellega a good indicator of that contempt. This contempt, in turn, drew him into the political quagmire he finds himself in today. Unfortunately for him, his political future now hinges on the outcome of the conflict he has initiated with the Amharas willingly .

The first assumption was based on the group of Amhara elites, often referred to as the "BADEN serviles," who seemed to have no clue how to represented the broader Amhara population. Abiy and his close ally, Shimelis, seemed to believe that they could allow the mass slaughter of Amharas in Oromia, and yet, upon their arrival in Bahir Dar, they would be ceremoniously welcomed with honorary gifts such as the traditional "Kaba" garment—not just once, but every time they returned. This delusion of praise ignored the deep grievances of the Amhara people.

The second group that influenced Abiy's miscalculations were the so-called "belly dancers" or "Addis smoothers"—individuals who, despite the mass evictions and destruction of homes affecting hundreds of thousands of Addis Ababa residents by Shimelis and Adanech, continued to heap praise upon Abiy. Their sycophancy blinded him to the real sentiment brewing in Amhara regions.

After the war with the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) subsided, Abiy identified the Amhara people as the next threat that needed to be neutralized. With the support of the BADEN , he pursued a campaign aimed solely at disarming the Amharas. Although the Amhara people are deeply religious and hold authority in high regard, believing that power is divinely granted, they were not naïve enough to sign away their existence to a leader they perceived as a genocidal maniac, one who seemed to take pleasure in the suffering and deaths of their kin.

Now, the Amharas find themselves fighting a war for survival, one that will not end until the existential threat they face is eliminated. A year into this struggle, the question remains: where does the Amhara fight for survival stand today? A Sobering reality born out of wicked assumption Abiy and his stooges have to contend with.
I really have trouble getting your thesis. Body of information or evidences to support your assertion.
And then your conclusion.

Please if you can rewrite your post, I would appreciate it.
Mitriaq, intentionally, you make more enemies for the Amara tribe. I don't think I want to be.
You a disgusting tribalist!!

Abere
Senior Member
Posts: 14857
Joined: 18 Jul 2019, 20:52

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by Abere » 10 Sep 2024, 09:04

It is a no brainer, Misraq and her minion aka "union" are NOT Amhara at all. They are the sworn enemies of Amhara, coming by shrouding themselves as if they were Amhara - these are Woyane/Shabia in disguise. They pretend cursing Woyane and Shabia - just to get acceptance by those sheepish flowers, but they love of their Woyanent to death. They love Isaias Afework, the doddering decadent evil, from the bottom of their hearts. Both of whom are anti-Amhara. They are snakes with shimmering scales/skins/ born of snakes egg. Everything the talk or preach about is to tend Amhara into the wrong trail - these two individuals are the evil Satan that deceived Adam and Eve to eat the fruit of death

ethiopianunity
Senior Member
Posts: 10471
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 17:38

Re: The critical mass of Fano

Post by ethiopianunity » 10 Sep 2024, 09:22

Abere, Odie,

Have you noticed since pp take over whst kind of people come out entertaining on you tube as Amara? They dress like Shabo/Tplf and nothing like the Amara traditions l have known for years. These are tge Tplf/Shabo who have been dividing and bleeding Amara within. This describes Misraq very well and possibly, union

Post Reply