On the one hand the statement reiterates TPLF's support for the peace agreement and its full commitment for the implementation. On the other hand it says that those negotiators in South Africa are not representatives of the TPLF. Further, it says that TPLF (as per constitution) is a political party and has no combatants and fighters and as such the wording in the peace agreement should be corrected.
After listening to the Amharic version repeatedly, my understanding is that TPLF CC is distancing itself from the Tigray regional government that was led by Dr. Debretsion and that sent representatives to South Africa. Negotiators such as general Tsadkan are in fact not members of TPLF but as general Tsadkan himself said part of the Tigray regional government.
TPLF CC is now distancing itself from the regional government that is declared illegal by the federal government and is agreed to be dissolved and replaced by an interim government according to the South Africa agreement. TPLF CC is saying that the agreement was the work of the regional Tigray government and not TPLF and if you blame anything about the contents of it then blame the Tigray government led by Debretsion (which soon be nonexistent).
Furthermore, TPLF CC distances itself from TDF too. It says TDF is not the army of the TPLF as TPLF is a legal party and under the constitution is not allowed to have an army. TPLF abides by the constitution and do not have an army. In this regard what TPLF CC is asking is only for the wording to be corrected and not rejecting the disarmament of TDF. So it is just distancing itself from everything what TDF is and did. It is not rejecting the disarmament of TDF.
It is important to note that TPLF CC did not reject any of the main points of the peace agreement. It did not reject the fact that the regional Tigray government will be dissolved and replaced by an interim government led by the federal government. TPLF CC just made them responsible for the South Africa agreement. It also did not reject the disarmament of TDF. It only is asking the wording to be corrected.
It looks like TPLF CC is throwing both the regional tigray government and TDF under the bus by distancing itself from both and not rejecting their dissolvement/disarmament. Even when asking for the correction of the wording, TPLF insists that it only struggles peacefully.
It seems for me TPLF as a party is preparing itself for post Tigray regional government and post TDF in hopes of continuing to play a main role as a legal political party in Ethiopia under the constitution. For that purpose, it is distancing itself from the two entities that are explicitly called illegally and are agreed to be dissolved according to the peace agreement.
By distancing itself from these two illegal entities and by showing its commitment for the implementation of the agreement, TPLF CC is hoping to play a political role in Tigray as a peaceful and recognized legal political party in the coming years.
Can the TPLF convince Tigreans that it was not the TPLF but the regional government representatives who negotiated the SA peace agreement? This is a hard sell. And also can the TPLF now say, I don't own TDF so if the federal government disarms it then don't blame me? Can it also successfully escape responsibility for the atrocities and human rights violations committed by TDF in Amhara and Afar regions?
This is of course a dubious strategy but it seems this is the strategy TPLF is now looking for the coming years in hopes of escaping accountability while still continuing to play a major role in Tigray politics.