Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 37347
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Power moves: Samantha Power’s celebrity draws spotlight to USAID — and questions about her future

Post by Zmeselo » 15 Nov 2021, 16:21



FOREIGN POLICY
Power moves: Samantha Power’s celebrity draws spotlight to USAID — and questions about her future

The longtime human rights crusader is energizing an agency few Americans know about, while fueling speculation about her next step.


Samantha Power and the USAID building | POLITICO illustration/Photos by AP

By NAHAL TOOSI

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/11/1 ... ure-515606

11/14/2021

Afghanistan was falling into chaos, the Taliban blitzing across the country, a darkness closing on generations of women.

But as the crisis unfolded in early August, one of President Joe Biden’s most prominent and outspoken foreign policy aides — a champion and scholar of human rights — said nothing. Samantha Power didn’t even tweet about it.

Her silence, while temporary, was unusual. But it kept her out of the fray at a difficult moment abroad and domestically for the Biden administration. When critics slammed its handling of the Afghan debacle, few, if any, pointed a finger at her.

The Pulitzer Prize-winning former United Nations ambassador has rarely avoided the public spotlight since Biden gave her the reins of the U.S. Agency for International Development. She’d appeared on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," hobnobbed with pop stars, and cranked up USAID’s press release generator. Biden had even given her a guaranteed spot on the National Security Council, assuring her West Wing access, while high-profile trips abroad along with a kinetic Twitter account kept her in the public eye.

Her visibility in Washington has prompted speculation — from within USAID’s nonpartisan career ranks to both current Democratic and past Republican political appointees — that Power has her eyes on a bigger job. A potential secretary of State? National security adviser? World Bank chief?


"The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" and guest Samantha Power during a Dec. 11, 2019 show. | Scott Kowalchyk/CBS via Getty Images

She is outspoken to such a degree that some lawmakers and their aides quietly wonder if it’s counterproductive for U.S. diplomacy. So when the former Obama administration Cabinet member demurred on Afghanistan, some foreign policy hands saw a strategic move to protect her career prospects and reputation.
What a lot of people believe is that she’s just auditioning,
said one former senior USAID official, who, like most other people cited in this article, requested anonymity to candidly discuss a powerful figure.

Given her resume so far,
if she wants to go anywhere after USAID, the most logical place for her to go within the U.S. government would be secretary of State or national security adviser,
added a second former senior USAID official.

Not that those positions are available for the taking.

Despite some calls for his ouster following the Afghan crisis, national security adviser Jake Sullivan appears secure in his job. Asked if Biden retains confidence in Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who likewise faced heavy criticism in the wake of the Afghan debacle, a White House spokesperson replied: “Absolutely.”

A USAID spokesperson flatly responded “no” when asked if Power sought a higher-profile post. Via the spokesperson, Power declined an interview with POLITICO.

Among aides to Biden, Power was something of a celebrity long before joining the administration. Her mere presence at USAID is boosting awareness of an agency responsible for tens of billions of dollars in spending abroad. USAID officials marvel at Power’s media savvy and Rolodex. They note that she’s on a first-name basis with people who in the past would barely give the agency the time of day.
She doesn’t do ambassadors,
one senior USAID official said.
She goes straight to heads of state.
Power player

Power, who was born in Ireland, had an early career as a journalist, making a name for herself as a war correspondent in Bosnia. She went on to gain global fame for writing “A Problem from Hell,” a deep look at America’s often-failed responses to genocide. The book won a 2003 Pulitzer Prize, https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/samantha-power and it put her on a first-name basis with many top world figures.

During Barack Obama’s presidency, Power served on the National Security Council staff as senior director for multilateral affairs and human rights. She later became Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations, where she gained a reputation as a highly driven, and sometimes difficult, manager.

Power often advocated for U.S. military intervention on human rights grounds, such as in Libya in 2011, but she didn’t always win those debates, an experience she describes in her 2019 memoir,
The Education of An Idealist.
She’s also half of a power couple: her husband is renowned legal scholar Cass Sunstein, a former Obama appointee who’s been advising the Biden administration on immigration.

Since taking over USAID in the spring, Power has gone on several major trips, including to countries in Central America https://gt.usembassy.gov/usaid-administ ... guatemala/ and Africa as well as to earthquake-devastated Haiti. https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... s-to-haiti She has met with genre-spanning musical artist The Weeknd, https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... ies-tigray who is of Ethiopian descent, to discuss ways to ease the humanitarian crisis in that part of Africa, as well as everyone from Ukraine’s prime minister to


During her nine-minute segment
on Colbert’s show, she described USAID as America’s “soft power arsenal” and one of its “better-kept secrets.
We do everything from support the education of girls to vaccinating young people and preventing outbreaks of disease,
Power said.

Earlier this month, Power laid out her vision for USAID, https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... -inclusive including promises to recruit a more diverse workforce and direct more development dollars to local organizations in countries where USAID operates.

The number of USAID press releases appears to have skyrocketed under Power, and it’s a rare one that isn’t centered on what Power has lately done in her jam-packed schedule.
Administrator Power Visits Delaware State University, https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... university


one recently noted.

Power also uses social media to an extraordinary degree, commenting on everything from the melons of Uzbekistan to the Cuban government’s repression of artists to the importance of fixing America’s immigration system.

A State Department official complained that Power is so prolific that public relations staffers there at times wonder if their USAID counterparts will release a Power statement before Blinken comments on an issue. Congressional aides said they’d heard similar grumbling from State.
I see a thousand readouts a day from USAID about things that she is doing. The other day there was something with the Irish somebody,
the State Department official said.
There’s just this desire to be part of every conversation.
Sometimes, State Department officials wonder why Power weighs in at all. For instance, earlier this month she slammed Nicaragua’s election, https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... -nicaragua which dictator Daniel Ortegawon” after jailing all the legitimate opposition candidates. The press release could have easily been written for Blinken.

Asked why Power issued the Nicaragua statement, the USAID spokesperson said:
Programming to strengthen democracy and fight corruption has been core to USAID's work for decades and is one of Administrator Power's top priorities for the agency.
Power’s allies say her motives are pure.
Her whole life, she’s internalized a lesson that you can help advance things you care about by bringing attention to them,
said Ben Rhodes, a former senior national security aide in the Obama administration.

And her defenders include both Sullivan and Blinken.
She is a stellar teammate,
Sullivan said of Power in a statement.
And the president relies on her strong counsel and key insights across the full range of foreign policy issues.
In a separate statement, Blinken said the Biden team was lucky to include Power because of her
unique experience, broad expertise and deep passion.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken listens during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Sept. 14, 2021 on Capitol Hill in Washington. Blinken was questioned about the Biden administration's handling of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. | Drew Angerer/Pool via AP

Traditionally, and according to statute, https://www.usglc.org/blog/the-case-for ... -separate/ the USAID administrator has deferred to the secretary of State for policy guidance, though many past agency chiefs have felt quite free to share their policy views in internal discussions.

A senior Biden administration official said that the president decided to make the USAID chief an official member of the National Security Council’s Principals Committee before Power was selected for the job. It was all due to Biden’s desire to better integrate USAID into foreign policy decision-making, the official said.

USAID officials say having Power formally at the table is a step up.
We’re, like, on the map,
the senior USAID official said.
It’s not State telling us what to do. It’s us engaging with, ‘Hold on a sec, let’s look at this from a development angle.’
A tough boss

During much of Donald Trump’s presidency, USAID was overseen by Mark Green, a Republican former congressman and ambassador who commanded bipartisan respect. Green adopted a low profile, keeping the agency off of Trump’s radar and focused on its mission of development, humanitarian work and promoting democracy.

Green’s departure in spring 2020 coincided with a White House effort to jam-pack government bodies with Trump loyalists. USAID soon found itself home to several Trump appointees who had taken actions or made comments troubling https://news.yahoo.com/very-anxious-tim ... 43926.html to many of the agency’s career employees.

Morale sank, and the coronavirus pandemic, which strained the agency across the globe, didn’t help.


United States Agency for International Development (USAID) administrator Mark Green speaks to members of the press during a briefing at the Munich Security conference in Munich, Germany, Friday, Feb. 14, 2020. | Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Pool Photo via AP

When Power’s nomination was first announced, USAID employees were generally happy to learn someone so prominent would soon lead them. But some had reservations, having heard that Power, during her time at the United States Mission to the United Nations, was an unusually demanding boss.

No one doubted that Power genuinely cared about the subjects she and her team tackled. Some former and current aides talk about her in wondrous terms, saying she’s the type of person who truly wants to change the world for the better.

But her dearth of previous management experience didn’t always match well with her intense drive. Multiple people familiar with the issue said Power expected her staff to work unnecessarily long hours and that she would occasionally admonish employees in front of others. It didn’t help that Power seemed to have an endless list of priorities, one former staffer said.
There was a culture of blame fostered,
the former staffer recalled.
There was working people all hours of the night. Making meeting after meeting after meeting. It cuts into your ability to work. There was real burnout.
Even that staffer, however, said that Power became aware that she had to adjust her methods, and current USAID officials say she seems attuned to concerns that her hard-charging style may not always be the best fit.
I think she’s evolved as a manager, and she has a cadre of people around her whom she has confidence in,
one USAID official said.
It’s been working well.

United States Ambassador to the U.N. Samantha Power field questions from reporters during her final press conference, Friday, Jan. 13, 2017 at U.N. headquarters. | Bebeto Matthews/AP Photo

Power has recruited an array of people for various positions, including bringing in some highly loyal aides who worked for her at the United Nations. Perhaps the most high-profile figure nominated to work for Power at USAID is Atul Gawande, the surgeon https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/hsph- ... said-post/ and New Yorker writer. If confirmed, he’ll serve as the assistant administrator of USAID’s global health bureau.
USAID lost a lot of talent in the last administration,
the USAID spokesperson said, referring to the Trump years.
Administrator Power is fully focused on rebuilding and recruiting.
Asked about Power’s management style, the USAID spokesperson said Power has “profound respect” for the people who’ve worked with her before, and that her
entire career has been focused on the need to promote the dignity of individuals.
Administrator Power works hard, and so does her staff,
the spokesperson said.
And that is what the American people expect of those entrusted with the responsibilities and resources for which she is responsible.
'Do no harm'

So far, Power has not broken publicly in any major way with Blinken or others on the Biden team when it comes to policy. But her public comments, combined with her professional and personal star power, have led to some concerns about her role and that of the secretary of State getting blurred.

Take Ethiopia, where a war between federal forces and fighters aligned with the Tigray People’s Liberation Front has led to atrocities and starvation. The senior USAID official said that, in an early brainstorming session with staffers, Power asked about ways to embarrass the Ethiopian government given its role in the unfolding catastrophe in the Tigray region and beyond.

Power visited Ethiopia in August. https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... s-ethiopia While there, she urged government leaders to avoid language that could escalate the conflict, warning that
there are many, many people out there who hear rhetoric, hateful rhetoric or dehumanizing rhetoric and take measures into their own hands or can be incited by that.

Top: Displaced Amharas from different villages now controlled by Tigrayan forces in the North Gondar zone, queue to receive food at a kindergarten school housing the internally-displaced, in Debark, in the Amhara region of northern Ethiopia Wednesday, Aug. 25, 2021. Bottom: An Ethiopian woman argues with others over the allocation of yellow split peas after it was distributed by the Relief Society of Tigray in the town of Agula, in the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia. | AP Photo

Ethiopia’s prime minister, Abiy Ahmed — who has called opponents in the conflict “weeds” — didn’t grant Power a meeting during her trip, which many observers took as a deliberate snub. https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/08/11/et ... an-crisis/

On one hand, many of Power’s supporters — including within USAID — say she’s right to speak out on the deepening crisis. After all, things have gotten so bad in the conflict that some close observers are using words like “genocide” and Blinken is pondering how to label the atrocities there. Besides, her aides say, Power is careful to stick to an administration-approved message.
We’re not out there being rogue on our own. It’s pretty coordinated,
a second senior USAID official said.
There’s some really bad things happening on Tigray. I, for one, want the U.S. government to speak out on that. We can’t turn a blind eye to crimes being committed against human beings.
But Power’s celebrity status, as well as her reputation as a genocide scholar and interventionist, can inflame tensions, others warn. She is not, after all, the typical, often-little-known figure atop America’s main overseas aid agency.

Aid workers on the ground in Ethiopia have expressed worries to U.S. lawmakers’ offices that their work — which often relies on U.S. funding — may be endangered if the Ethiopian government or other authorities get angry enough with Power, people familiar with the matter told POLITICO.


In this Wednesday, June 16, 2021 file photo, Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed speaks at a final campaign rally at a stadium in the town of Jimma in the southwestern Oromia Region of Ethiopia. Ethiopia's Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed has been sworn in Monday, Oct. 4, 2021 for a second five-year term. | Mulugeta Ayene/AP Photo

During a hearing in July, Sen. Jim Risch of Idaho, the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, alluded to his concerns https://www.foreign.senate.gov/press/ra ... et-request about Power and the potential politicization of aid.
USAID leadership should follow the ‘Do No Harm’ principle in delivering assistance, while leaving the politics of U.S.-Ethiopia bilateral relationship to the diplomats,
Risch said.

The USAID spokesperson suggested that Power has other plans.
Administrator Power has been and will remain outspoken about the conflict in Northern Ethiopia because it is one of the worst humanitarian and human rights crises in a generation and USAID is the lead government agency in responding to humanitarian crises overseas,
the spokesperson said.

Quiet on the Afghan front

Because she’s usually so outspoken, Power’s early silence on Afghanistan was hard to miss.

For much of August, she focused on other issues, especially the U.S. response to an earthquake in Haiti, for which Biden gave her a lead role. It wasn’t until Aug. 18, after the Taliban had taken the Afghan capital and prompted a chaotic evacuation of Americans and Afghan allies, that Power issued a short Twitter thread on the situation.
All of @USAID https://twitter.com/USAID is heartbroken by the scenes we’re seeing in Afghanistan and the dangers confronting the Afghan people,
she wrote.
Our top priority right now is doing everything we can for the safety of our Afghan staff and partners.

Haitian Prime Minister Ariel Henry speaks during a joint press conference with USAID and SOUTHCOM at the international airport in Port-au-Prince, Haiti,Thursday, Aug. 26, 2021, weeks after the 7.2 magnitude earthquake. At left are USAID Administrator Samantha Power and SOUTHCOM Commander Admiral Faller. | Joseph Odelyn/AP Photo

Power became much more vocal about Afghanistan in subsequent days; she convened a high-level roundtable https://www.usaid.gov/news-information/ ... fghanistan on the country with senior officials from an array of other nations during the United Nations General Assembly.

But people in the aid and foreign policy establishments noticed her early silence, and some questioned if Power initially didn’t want to touch the debacle for fear of tainting her reputation.
The State Department does not look good on Afghanistan right now, so you do wonder if there’s opportunity for her there,
a senior official at an international non-profit that deals with USAID said.

It’s not clear what position Power took during the administration’s internal debates about Afghanistan; admittedly, much of the discussion about withdrawing U.S. troops from the country was hashed out before she formally joined the team. The USAID spokesperson said Power
strongly supports President Biden’s shift of American foreign policy from ‘relentless war’ to ‘relentless diplomacy,’ including in Afghanistan.

Counter-clockwise from top: In this photo provided by the Spanish Defence Ministry and taken in Kabul, Afghanistan, people board a Spanish airforce A400 plane as part of an evacuation plan at Kabul airport in Afghanistan, Wednesday Aug. 18, 2021. | Spanish Defence Ministry via AP. A Taliban fighter patrols in Wazir Akbar Khan in the city of Kabul, Afghanistan, Wednesday, Aug. 18, 2021. | Rahmat Gul/AP Photo. Taliban fighters patrol in Wazir Akbar Khan neighborhood in the city of Kabul, Afghanistan, Wednesday, Aug. 18, 2021. | Rahmat Gul/AP Photo.

The senior administration official said the White House had not directed Power to avoid talking about Afghanistan.
In no way did anyone discourage her from speaking out,
the senior official said.
Quite the opposite, in fact. It is helpful to all of us when she is out there carrying a message.
The USAID spokesperson said Power’s priority as the Afghan crisis unfolded was helping Americans and Afghans connected to USAID get out of the country. That was confirmed by multiple other USAID officials.
Maybe she didn’t want to [deleted] off the Taliban until our people were out,
the first senior USAID official said.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 37347
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Power moves: Samantha Power’s celebrity draws spotlight to USAID — and questions about her future

Post by Zmeselo » 15 Nov 2021, 16:41






ኣበይ'ድኣ ኣለኽን እተን "ሚሌ ተታሒዛ" ትብላ ዝነበርክን፡ ዓባቓት ካድራት ህውሓት? ሕጂ፡ ከም ኣብ ማይ ዝኣተወት ኣጭዋ'ዶ ኮይንክን? 😂😂😂








Last edited by Zmeselo on 15 Nov 2021, 17:32, edited 2 times in total.

Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 37347
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Power moves: Samantha Power’s celebrity draws spotlight to USAID — and questions about her future

Post by Zmeselo » 15 Nov 2021, 17:01

Nov 4th 2020 - Ethiopia's Internal Modern Day Pearl Harbor




______________



Amazing, really, that a fast-food chain seems to have more awareness and far better sense of accountability regarding funding/aid to TPLF than actual governments!


Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 37347
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: Power moves: Samantha Power’s celebrity draws spotlight to USAID — and questions about her future

Post by Zmeselo » 15 Nov 2021, 17:25



Human Rights Crisis in Ethiopia: A Letter to Gerry Connolly, Congressman of Virginia’s 11th District

https://www.getfactet.org/post/human-ri ... sman-of-va

6 days ago



The history of Ethiopia is rich and complex. Ethiopia has endured countless regimes of oppression. Ethiopia is a country composed of over eighty ethnic groups who have contributed to form a nation that resisted colonialism and remained independent.

The TPLF (Tigray People’s Liberation Front; also, sometimes referred to as the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front [EPRDF]) rose to power in 1991 following the fall of the Communist Derg regime. For nearly three decades, the TPLF maintained a stronghold dictatorship in Ethiopia, dividing the country amongst imaginary ethnic lines – policy best described as ethnic federalism.

In 2018, there was a transition in power and current Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed became the leader of the national government. Following this transition in power, an official election was held in the summer of 2021 with approximately 70-80% voter turnout. A monumental occasion as it marked the country’s first democratic and transparent election with over 100,000 local election monitors and +100 international election observers.

The TPLF refused to acknowledge the democratically elected choice of the Ethiopian people (Abiy Ahmed). Since November 3rd, 2020, beginning with a massacre of the unsuspecting Ethiopian National Defense Force (ENDF), the TPLF has made its aims clear: it will stop at nothing to regain its dictatorship within Ethiopia even if it means killing and permanently destroying the lives of hundreds of thousands to millions of Ethiopians and Eritreans.

Unfortunately, in these current times, Ethiopia is facing both internal and external threats to its sovereignty. The crimes committed by the TPLF coupled with mis-guided foreign policies and rhetoric that does not align with the goals and values of over 100 million Ethiopians are an existential threat to Ethiopia.

Hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians have been displaced as a result of unprovoked TPLF advances into regions outside of Tigray (e.g. Amhara and Afar regions - maps included at the conclusion of the recommendations). Thousands of innocent people have been killed solely on the basis of their ethnic background. This is the genocide of the Ethiopian and Eritrean people living in Ethiopia by the TPLF.

The TPLF is also responsible for diverting humanitarian aid to Tigray to fuel its insurgency. For example, hundreds of aid trucks provided by the UN are still unaccounted for and there have been no investigations regarding this by the UN. Pictures and videos circulating through local Tigrayan media show aid trucks outfitted to transport TPLF fighters and weapons to surrounding regions.

Additionally, the TPLF has the backing of large Western media streams that have been absurdly dishonest in their reporting, with notable sources painting the TPLF as underdog rebels with a just cause. Even in the midst of the TPLF continuing to commit atrocities, the Ethiopian national government entered a unilateral ceasefire (the TPLF rejected the ceasefire) on June 28th, 2021. However, the international community (including the U.S.) continues to criticize the national government for blocking aid, although national forces withdrew from the Tigray region in July 2021.

Most concerning, the TPLF has committed war crimes to the highest degree, including the use of child soldiers both in battle and as human shields (a violation of the 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Rome Statute of International Criminal Court).

Direct accounts from IDPs have shared that child prisoners of other ethnicities (e.g. Amhara, Afar) are forced to march in front of advancing Ethiopian National Defense Forces. Children whose innocence is taken from them, meeting an early grave because the equivalent of an oligarchy, a faction that was once deemed a terrorist organization by the U.S., is determined to slaughter its way back into power. It is vital that the U.S. not repeat the crucial mistakes of permitting genocide due to inaction, similar to Rwanda and Uganda.

Objectives:

The U.S. must take into account the best interests of the Ethiopian people in order to find itself standing on the right side of Ethiopian history. It must engage in dialogue with the democratically elected national government and respect its rights to defend the Ethiopian people from the TPLF while recognizing that the TPLF is not an equal partner to the government.

Options:

Option 1 – The U.S. officially condemn the actions of the TPLF and designate the TPLF as a terrorist organization. The U.S. encourages the rightfully elected Ethiopian government to protect the Ethiopian people, who have made it clear they do not wish to continue under a rule of ethnic federalism by the TPLF.

The U.S. supports the progress of Ethiopia, allowing Ethiopia to serve as a model of democracy in the Horn of Africa, further motivating neighboring countries to adopt democracy within their politics.

The goodwill of U.S. policy cultivates stronger relations with Ethiopia and helps create avenues for a mutually beneficial course which includes economic development/trade, collaboration to fight global terrorism, and stability within the Horn of Africa. Ethiopia continues to be a reliable ally for the U.S. and solidifies itself as a leader both regionally and on a continental scale within Africa.

Option 2 – The U.S. continues to be a partial policy maker and treats the TPLF as an equal to the national government. The planned delisting of Ethiopia from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) throws millions of Ethiopians into further poverty.

The Ethiopian government faces immense undeserved pressure from the U.S. to negotiate with the TPLF, allowing the TPLF to gain strength and lead Ethiopia into further chaos. A prolonged civil war leads to millions of lives lost and tens of millions displaced. Ultimately, a refugee crisis ensues and this will likely eclipse the refugee crisis of northern Africa and the Middle East due to Ethiopia’s sizable population.

The collapse of Ethiopia becomes inevitable as the TPLF divides the country amongst ethnic lines. Countries within the Horn of Africa will view democracy as an unfathomable goal and revert to totalitarian/militaristic regimes, ultimately silencing the will of the people.

Option 3 – The U.S. utilize the United Nations Human Rights Council and raise its concerns of genocide and other war related atrocities committed by the TPLF by way of a public written report or tribunal council. This is a necessary step to investigate crimes being committed in accordance with the Geneva Convention. These actions would provide an independent and external perspective on the scale of the inhumane actions of the TPLF.

Option 4 – The U.S. pursues targeted sanctions against the TPLF and TPLF leadership. These sanctions include: an arms embargo (ban on weapons, military vehicles/aid vehicles transformed into military vehicles, protective attire, radio communication devices, etc), along with asset freezes and seizures of the TPLF leadership.

It is much more feasible to directly affect the financial means of support for the TPLF by targeting the financial transactions of the leadership (e.g. Getachew Reda, Debretsion Gebremichael). Engaging with FinCEN (a bureau of the U.S Department of the Treasury) to implement these actionable items would be effective. As stated by FinCEN, its mission is to safeguard the financial system from
illicit use and combat money laundering and promote national security.
Recommendation: Options 1, 4

Repeatedly, the TPLF has shown its objectives do not include an Ethiopia for all peoples of Ethiopia. The TPLF oscillates between a position of disguising itself as victims and in the same breath terrorizes the Ethiopian people through its killings of innocent civilians.

The U.S. needs to recognize that the TPLF is not an equal participant in the future of Ethiopia. As such, it cannot proceed with its current policy of demanding that the Ethiopian national government negotiate a ceasefire with the TPFL. Too often, accountability for atrocities committed are overlooked in such negotiations. This cannot be the case moving forward. The TPLF leadership needs to be held fully accountable and face justice as outlined by the Ethiopian national law.

A stable Ethiopia is beneficial to the U.S. and to the rest of the Horn of Africa. Favorable relations between the U.S. and Ethiopia will only help further the value of democracy within the region. Noting recent events within Sudan, where a military dictatorship has forcefully taken power from the Sudanese people, the story in Ethiopia cannot afford to have the same conclusion.

Tens of millions of Ethiopians have voted and elected a leader. This should be honored and not punished because it does not fit the interests of Western powers. Support for the TPLF and/or perceiving the TPLF as a vessel of leadership equates to support for the collapse of Ethiopia.

We, Ethiopian and Eritrean Americans, will not stand idle as foreign forces continue to blindly support a regime change that is detrimental for the progress of Ethiopia. It is imperative that the U.S. government recalibrates its approach to the Ethiopian National Government. It cannot expect an honest dialogue with the democratically elected government as long as it continues to recognize the TPLF as anything more than a terrorist group whose sole purpose is to rule over Ethiopia through terror.

Northern Virginia boasts a sizable Ethiopian/Eritrean population, estimated to be upwards of 100,000 people. Ethiopians and Eritreans have been an ally for the Democratic Party for decades, voting for Democratic nominees consistently. We now ask that our concerns regarding the conflict in Ethiopia be seriously considered.



Reference:

https://spp-fi.medium.com/tigray-confli ... 54592c54bf

https://www.gettyimages.ca/search/2/ima ... oducts=all

https://jeffpearce.medium.com/ethiopia- ... b069747fdc

https://theowp.org/the-recruitment-of-c ... -ethiopia/

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ethi ... edirect=uk

https://www.trtworld.com/africa/ethiopi ... -51249/amp

https://www.france24.com/en/africa/2021 ... on-says-un

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/u ... -in-tigray

https://peacediplomacy.org/2021/11/03/f ... -ethiopia/

https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/fil ... o_TPLF.pdf

https://www.ascleiden.nl/content/ascl-b ... -normality

Post Reply