Ethiopian News, Current Affairs and Opinion Forum
Horus
Senior Member+
Posts: 42746
Joined: 19 Oct 2013, 19:34

The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Horus » 20 Jul 2021, 03:52


Horus
Senior Member+
Posts: 42746
Joined: 19 Oct 2013, 19:34

Re: The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Horus » 20 Jul 2021, 04:06


Horus
Senior Member+
Posts: 42746
Joined: 19 Oct 2013, 19:34

Re: The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Horus » 20 Jul 2021, 04:18


Zmeselo
Senior Member+
Posts: 37345
Joined: 30 Jul 2010, 20:43

Re: The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Zmeselo » 20 Jul 2021, 05:04

Great videos, H!

This is why, I believe, "Churchill Avenue" should be changed to something else though:

Views of Churchill towards race

Historian John Charmley has written that Churchill viewed British domination around the globe, such as the British Empire, as a natural consequence of social Darwinism. Charmley argued that similar to many of Churchill's contemporaries, he held a hierarchical perspective on race, believing white Protestant Christians to be at the top of this hierarchy, and white Catholics beneath them, while Indians were higher on this hierarchy than Black Africans. Charmley adds the he believes that Churchill saw himself and Britain as being the winners in a social Darwinian hierarchy. However, historian Richard Toye follows on from this by saying that Churchill was not unique in having these views, and that although Churchill may have thought that white people were superior, it did not mean he thought it was therefore correct to treat non-white people in an inhumane way — he did not.

Churchill advocated against black or indigenous self-rule in Africa, Australia, the Caribbean, the Americas and India, believing that the British Empire promoted and maintained the welfare of those who lived in the colonies; he insisted that
our responsibility to the native races remains a real one.
In 1899, a Boer jailer asked Churchill:
…is it right that a dirty Kaffir should walk on the pavement?… That’s what they do in your British Colonies
.

Churchill termed this the root of Boer discontent:

British government is associated in the Boer farmer’s mind with violent social revolution. Black is to be proclaimed the same as white…. nor is a tigress robbed of her cubs more furious than is the Boer at this prospect.

In 1902, Churchill stated that the "great barbaric nations" would "menace civilised nations", and that "The Aryan stock is bound to triumph".

By the 1940s, Churchill still cherished the ideals of imperialism that he had followed since the 1890s, whilst much of British opinion had abandoned them. Colonialism was now seen as a crude device for the oppression of the weak by the strong. After the Second World War, old arguments about white racial superiority were no longer acceptable. The British public rejected the Churchillian notion of an imperial race predestined by moral character to rule and refashion the world in the British image. Among younger Britons, especially in academic circles, criticism grew sharper. Indeed, the empire itself was rapidly disintegrating, starting with India in 1947, and finishing up with all the African colonies in the 1950s.

In 1955, Churchill expressed his support for the slogan "Keep England White" with regards to immigration from the West Indies.

Africa

According to historian Roland Quinault:
His reservations about black majority rule [in Africa after 1950] were based on considerations of class, education and culture, rather than race and colour. In that respect, Churchill's attitude resembled that of the mid-Victorians to the working classes – they should be cautiously and gradually admitted into the body politic.
Though he held particular contempt for Arabs, Churchill was supportive of Ibn Saud, insofar as Ibn Saud would support the policy for a Jewish state in Palestine that Churchill had driven personally in the 1920s. Churchill met Ibn Saud personally in February 1945 to discuss issues surrounding Palestine, though the meeting was reported by Saudis at the time as being widely unproductive, in great contrast to the meeting Ibn Saud had held with American President Franklin D. Roosevelt just days earlier.

After 1945, many and perhaps most black intellectuals and activists in the United States became convinced that Churchill's racism was a major factor in what they saw as his cynical attempt to bùttress an exploitative overseas empire that Britain could no longer afford. They charged him with suppressing the democratic aspirations of people of colour.

South African President Thabo Mbeki claimed his attitude toward Black people was racist and patronising. That complaint was shared by critics such as Clive Ponting. Historian Roland Quinault states that,
Even some historians otherwise sympathetic to Churchill have concluded that he was blind to the problems of black people.

Selam/
Senior Member
Posts: 17842
Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 13:15

Re: The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Selam/ » 20 Jul 2021, 05:29

Sorry to say this but he’s a lousy cameraman & narrator.

Horus wrote:
20 Jul 2021, 04:18

Selam/
Senior Member
Posts: 17842
Joined: 04 Aug 2018, 13:15

Re: The Mighty Ethiopia & The Blameless Ethiopians !!

Post by Selam/ » 20 Jul 2021, 05:55

Well done here! I never forget the fried whole fish I had many years ago in a little shed by Zeway Lake. It’s a beautiful place.
Horus wrote:
20 Jul 2021, 04:06

Post Reply