Idiot AgameW Roman aka EthioRedsea is looking Eritreans Attention.
FYI agamewoch feel worthy when Eritreans talk to them or even slap in their starvin marvins faces. Agamewoch are the weirdest primates on earth. ተንከባላይ እህያ
Re: Ethiopian-Eritrean Federation: Only Isaias Afwereki matters
The filthy Agame! The current challenge of the people of Tigray is not finding a way to get out of the quagmire TPLF has immersed them into. It is the challenge that TPLF is an animal that does not learn from its mistakes. If it were normal leadership, it could have learned from its future mistakes and work hard to correct them. The future of the people of Tigray is with the people of Ethiopia and the dream of greater Tigray or TigrayTigrini needs to be buried once and for all.
Roman wrote: ↑30 May 2021, 14:43It's funny when I see shabians getting mad and especially the disapora ones because none of them actually matter. Don't these morons not realize that Eritrea is controlled by only Isaias Afwereki. - Once Isaias signs the legally binding deal and submits it to the UN then it's over.....
My message to Ethiopians: Don't waste your time with mindless shabians on the internet - The true owner of Eritrea aka the Afwereki family should be consulted. What's even more funnier is when Dina Mufti made the remarks and none of Eritrean representatives actually responded because it has already been agreed to and deal has been made.
Here's the question to shabians on here: What will you do? Are you going to protest? Are you going to cry to the west?
There's $hit you can do about it!
Ethiopia only has to convince Isaias Afwereki that this is what's best for him and his family.
-
Noble Amhara
- Senior Member
- Posts: 13713
- Joined: 02 Feb 2020, 13:00
- Location: Abysinnia
Re: Ethiopian-Eritrean Federation: Only Isaias Afwereki matters
At the heart of the problem is the idea of the nation state.
A nation is generally understood to be a culture or peoples, the main features of which include a shared language, ancestry, and perhaps a shared creed. A state is, more plainly, an administrative organization and a geopolitical realm. For Germany in 1871, the challenge was to inflate shared cultural features while downplaying sectarian differences, lingering loyalties felt in some regions to their neighbours (including France, Austria, and Switzerland), and the fact that some of the German states had been at one another’s throats for centuries. Old histories of difference had to be superseded by histories of sameness and mutual interest. Italy— a linguistic patchwork that at least shared a common Catholic heritage (however vexed relations might have been between Italy and the Papal States) — seized upon Dante as the father of the Italian language and, like Germany, sought to minimize historic rivalries between regions. A new iconography of the Italian state, with General Giuseppe Garibaldi at its spiritual centre and a new king in a shared capital, were key to creating an “Italian” nation state. Increasingly the United States would invoke the language of “nation” as well, most notably in its Pledge of Allegiance in 1892 in which the “nation” and the federal “state” become indistinguishable.
Clearly some nation states in the late 19th century were less unified culturally than others. Canada’s odds in this respect were hardly worse than those of many other newly emergent countries. But it is worth noting that there was, at the time of Confederation, confusion about what constituted a nation state, a sense that expansion and territorial unification was a legitimate part of building a country, and that “nation building” involved more than a railway or two.
Federation
a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs.
Ethiopia is following Eritreas central government policies I believe today we are in a federation with PDFG God Isaias Afwerki and it’s EPRDF student PP
What Ethiopia needs is a new constitution
A nation is generally understood to be a culture or peoples, the main features of which include a shared language, ancestry, and perhaps a shared creed. A state is, more plainly, an administrative organization and a geopolitical realm. For Germany in 1871, the challenge was to inflate shared cultural features while downplaying sectarian differences, lingering loyalties felt in some regions to their neighbours (including France, Austria, and Switzerland), and the fact that some of the German states had been at one another’s throats for centuries. Old histories of difference had to be superseded by histories of sameness and mutual interest. Italy— a linguistic patchwork that at least shared a common Catholic heritage (however vexed relations might have been between Italy and the Papal States) — seized upon Dante as the father of the Italian language and, like Germany, sought to minimize historic rivalries between regions. A new iconography of the Italian state, with General Giuseppe Garibaldi at its spiritual centre and a new king in a shared capital, were key to creating an “Italian” nation state. Increasingly the United States would invoke the language of “nation” as well, most notably in its Pledge of Allegiance in 1892 in which the “nation” and the federal “state” become indistinguishable.
Clearly some nation states in the late 19th century were less unified culturally than others. Canada’s odds in this respect were hardly worse than those of many other newly emergent countries. But it is worth noting that there was, at the time of Confederation, confusion about what constituted a nation state, a sense that expansion and territorial unification was a legitimate part of building a country, and that “nation building” involved more than a railway or two.
Federation
a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs.
Ethiopia is following Eritreas central government policies I believe today we are in a federation with PDFG God Isaias Afwerki and it’s EPRDF student PP
What Ethiopia needs is a new constitution